They're just sending out the bills a year early, due to an AI-based timing mistake.

Permanent standard time and flexible hours.

It is like no one researches these things.

Iâ(TM)d prefer you and everyone else just get darker drapes.

I wish I had some mod points for you. You speak truth.

It was repealed. People hated the sun coming up so late in the winter. Standard time, all year round please.

As long as it includes macros to trigger logic bombs in the AI agents they control to destroy them utterly, it will have value.

Of course they're going to be obsessed with AI. Look at how much money they've dumped into it. They have to make it work, no matter how few of the individual users of their products use or want it. If it all turns out to have flushed billions of dollars down the toilet, that flushing is going to take managers' careers with it, so they're desperate to find a way, any way, to point to some AI-integrated 'feature' they've added and say "Here. This is where AI makes a difference."

It just moves the source of the sales -- if the datacenter (AI or not) bubble pops, then all the chip-fab companies that are doubling down on RAM production for these datacenters will have production capacity they no longer have a market for at inflated prices, so rather than have to take a complete writeoff on their expanded production lines, they'll likely start pushing RAM at fire-sale prices in order to recover at least some of the money they'd poured into new production lines in the "line goes up" belief that datacenter RAM demand would be forever.

RFS is dead. Like his wife.

What could possibly go wrong?

Apple is becoming more MS every day.

"Now that's a name I've not heard in a long time"

Its called fingerprinting, and it has been going on a very long time, using techniques that go back decades. This just makes it more persistent and spans attempts to obfuscate fingerprinting in easier ways.

If you want to avoid this, work from a non-persistent VM that is created and destroyed every online session, using no identifiable information (no-logins ever).

Security isn't convenient.

More importantly, we keep seeing stories touting X number of megawatts of generating capacity for a new wind or solar farm -- but never a word about how much power that installation is expected to generate averaged across a year; the "installed capacity" tells you how much power it will generate under ideal conditions, but you could have a solar farm with a generating capacity of 1GW, and it's going to produce nothing at night. Similarly, a wind farm will produce no power when the wind speed is below the minimum for turning the turbines, or when the wind speed is high enough that the turbines have to be feathered to protect the generators from overspeed. Wind and solar installations typically have an average production close to a third of their installed capacity, so that 160k MW of solar and wind capacity would be each producing less than 55k MW in practice over time -- and require a considerable GWh storage capacity to supply demand when the wind and solar installations are not producing. If you have a solar farm that produces power at a rate of 100MW over the course of a day, half of that power would need to be diverted to charging battery storage to produce power at night when the solar farm isn't producing power, so the deliverable power of an intermittent source like wind or solar will be even less than it's actual production, because it needs to divert energy to the storage system that will back it up.

Now if only the AFP story would kill the seemingly-endless "Climate change is making [insert location here] warm up twice as fast as everywhere else" stories that, if you put them all together, would imply that the entire world is warming twice as fast as the entire world... demonstrating how idiotic these stories are.