Comment Re:It's Easy (Score 1) 60
i guess you missed the point and i'm not really surprised.
i guess you missed the point and i'm not really surprised.
The only things that are likely going to end it is an invasion by the US, the arming of the 70% who don't like the Iranian government
oh, about that, i just saw a clip from iranian tv 2 days ago: an irgc official in uniform was teaching the general public how to load and fire an ak47
or a capitulation by either Iran or the US.
neither. trump will either declare a win and walk away or get into even deeper shit and then declare a win and walk away. the world already changed on march 2026, is moving on and there's no going back.
What kind of "fuck your lungs" crap is this?
so
the study itself is paywalled, the sources aren't particularly reputable and the amount of information given is quite sparse. from the study's own abstract we know:
RESULTS - Our evidence indicates a link between wood burning emissions with increased concentrations in particle-bound lead that is associated with wood combustion. Linear regression models in Keene, NH (R2=0.438) and Rutland, VT (R2=0.341) indicate moderate agreement between tracers of wood smoke and lead suggesting a common source. On average, lead concentrations ranged from 0.86ng/m in the Rocky Mountains Region to 1.70ng/m in the Southeast Region. We observed varying correlations between lead and potassium across the US, with slight-to-modest agreement (R2=0.09–0.47) at most sites; the strongest associations were on the Pacific Coast (R2>0.40). This suggests that a strong relationship between potassium and lead is observed at many nationwide locations.
linear regressions yielding coefficients of 0.34 and 0.43 are presented as "moderate", while in a science/physics context that would be rather "low-to-moderate". this would be the association of lead present in particulate with it coming from wood burning: low-to-moderate. further, "slight-to-modest" coeffcients (0.09–0.47) of lead-potassium at most sites + the fact that strongest associations were on the pacific coast (0.40, still low-to-moderate)
without more data this study and the concluding word salad should be taken with a lot of sodium.
but let's just assume there actually is a strong correlation. where would that lead have come from? obviously from decades of using it in fuel and industrial and domestic applications (even toys for kids), as you well know "lead doesn't grow on trees". so the problem is having used lead irresponsibly for years. now traces of it still remain in trees and used wood (and probably all around the place) and will be making it into the environment (waterways or air) and our bodies no matter what for a long time, whether it's by burning, by wood simply decaying or by being chopped into furniture, and i would further suspect residual lead to be not only in wood. the main problem here isn't burning wood at all, it's decades of reckless use of lead, a practice surely defended for many years as "slight-to-low hazard" by dubious "scientific" claims just like these.
now back to your lungs:
We have a similar problem with people doing it to be trendy in the UK, and it needs to stop.
indeed, in an ideal world we shouldn't be using lead nor burning stuff. the world isn't ideal, and this isn't remotely comparable to existing hazards to your lungs and health in general caused by industrial pollution and transit, so let's not blow it out of proportion. if you want to scoff at a few uk trendies just because, fine, but you go tell that to people that have little other means and you may ask yourself why in the present world people still need to do that, with all we know and the resources we have?
China is aggressive.
that's rich.
is china blowing up civilian boats in the caribbean?
is china intercepting tankers and confiscating ship and cargo in international waters all around the world, which is the definition of piracy?
is china threatening to make other countries their fifty-x state?
is china imposing tariffs and (illegal) sanctions around the world willy nilly?
has china been fostering color-revolutions all around europe and asia?
has china educated, funded and armed takfiri fundamentalist groups (alqaeda, boko haram, isis) and then unleashed them on other countries?
is china carrying out a genocide in western asia?
has china attacked iran without provocation, twice (and failed), and plunged the world economy into chaos in the process?
please tell (with a straight face) how is china "aggressive"?
That said, China has zero ability to project its military any appreciable distance. The US in not threatened by China
this is partly true. china has no intent whatsoever of projecting military power. the us is indeed safe, not just because it is surrounded by oceans, but because china doesn't give a shit. however, china is also more than safe. fuck around and find out. besides, iran just showed the world what us military power is capable of: being the world's laughing stock.
now, in this context and after decades of western exceptionalist propaganda i understand your primitive instinct to indulge in trashtalking any other country except yours, but you really should be worrying about how to salvage at least something of your decaying colonial empire. that means: mind your own business and fucking reign in your degenerate elite. oh and try to rbe nice to your neighbors. good luck.
There's no way to evaluate whether that much code is well-written or secure
sorry? then you're not doing your job.
pre llm developers didn't remember to do e.g. asm system calls either, and that's not brain rot but abstraction. llms introduce a whole new level of abstraction but it's non-deterministic, so you can use as much llm as you like but you still have to do your job. if you don't do your job then you simply aren't a software developer, you're a vibe coder.
and vibe coders are fine, they can do damn cool stuff, but they aren't software developers and shouldn't be discussing about software development. vibe coding is building software without any engineering rigor, the result should be regarded as a mere curiosity, poc or prototype until it has been validated by an engineer.
long story short: if you produce a ton more lines of codes then good for you, but you'll have to hire a lot more software developers. cry me a river.
Support Mental Health. Or I'll kill you.