Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment The Rollercoaster is getting Wild (Score 1, Insightful) 44

Logically a companies stock price might reflect the amount of money a stock holder would expect to get back from owning the stock. If Microsoft were to return every last penny of profit to its stock holders today, and it returns less than a third of its profits now so that will have to change, and somehow continued to earn $35 billion a quarter, and people wanted to earn their money back while holding the stock in 20 years, Microsoft would be worth $2.8 trillion.

That gives you the timeline for doubling your money, assuming the stock is worth the same amount of $ you put in as at the start. If you put the same money into a high yield savings account you'd more than double your money in the same amount of time. Based purely on this people with math skills would put money in the savings account even if Microsoft suddenly gave away all its profits to stockholders, as they'd still earn more money from the savings account.

But Microsoft is worth 11% more than putting your money into a highly safe investment like a high yield savings account, if Microsoft were literally to give all of its money away every quarter for the next 20 years, which they will not. At least it's worth more according to "the market". Why? Well Microsoft's quarterly earning line went up steeper than "the market" expected it to. Which means people now hope that this line will go up steeper again next time over the last time it went higher steeper than people expected it to. And... that's it. Literally that's what "the market" is reacting to, the attention span and math skills of an upper middling third grader with attention span problems. Nevermind that, based on current dividends, Microsoft would need revenues the size of Switzerland to match a high yield savings account in return on investment. The line went steeper, that's what matters!

Comment Re:Isolated testing environment ? (Score 4, Interesting) 80

Either the company is lying about the testing environment being "isolated" to cover up their tracks and liability, or lying about the "rogue" AI altogether as an advertisement, or is incompetent enough to have it's employees believe open internet access is an "isolated environment". Whatever the case OpenAI should look bad for it.

Comment It's just software for sale (Score 1) 68

That the AI calls itself Claude is hilarious, showing how much was stolen by both the source code leak and distillation. That it's so trivial to steal an AI model should "rattle" the financials of the industry no matter what country it's from, but let's face it it's all based off hype anyway. Active maintenance on software has been the only way to sell software for decades now, and to earn any decent profits that just means going back to a world of vendor lock in and other dirty tricks played upon dimwitted suckers.

The AI model you spent half a trillion dollars developing is no more valuable than Microsoft Office is over LibreOffice, good fucking luck suckers.

Comment I'm certain everyone will apologize (Score 1) 59

All the people and social media posts and reporters that loudly shouted about how we shouldn't ban kids from social media because there's no scientific evidence of harm will now immediately turn around saying we should ban children from social media as solid scientific evidence points directly towards causing ADHD like symptoms. This will be inevitable as all arguments made by humans beings are based on sound logic they believe in strongly rather than something silly like believing in something based entirely on "vibes" and then finding justifications for their opinion after someone challenges it.

Incidentally has anyone seen my flying pig anywhere, his name's Wilbur and I'm afraid he's escaped and is trying to steal ice cream from hell again.

Comment Someone sell the Whitehouse- (Score 4, Informative) 215

Doesn't matter that you don't "own" the Whitehouse, a con artist once sold the Eiffel Tower, and almost got away with selling it twice. Just say you're authorized to sell the Whitehouse because Trump doesn't like it anymore and the ballroom costs too much, and someone will believe you and buy it because at this point why wouldn't they.

Comment OpenAI is run by Morons (Score 4, Interesting) 50

Morons with a capital M. As I've heard it direct from big tech company employees there are perfectly established ways to skirt trade secret laws, you sit there and ask the employees in question "how we might go about accomplishing" X thing that their previous employer did, and in a roundabout way they tell you what direction to take, and pretty soon your to the same place and that's it, you're free and clear. On the other hand directly asking "share secret project", "bring prototypes", and such directly seems to contradict all established trade secret law I know about.

Which is to say: Apple seems to have a fantastically clear and straightforward case and are 100% going to win an enormous settlement. OpenAI has to be the company with highest liabilities, maybe in all of history. Like holy fuck are they in the deepest hole I've seen since The South Seas Trading Company, the world first stock scam that was so big it almost bankrupted England. I can't wait for the podcasts and books and movie(s?, probably) all about the collapse. It'll be so much fun.

Slashdot Top Deals

Avoid strange women and temporary variables.

Working...