Comment Re:A lot of problems here (Score 1) 49
Who do you think is deciding roads don't need to be maintained?
So to be clear, you're functionally illiterate?
Who do you think is deciding roads don't need to be maintained?
So to be clear, you're functionally illiterate?
And this is someone who had the patience to run Slackware 3.9 as a primary desktop
Yeah, but those two things are diametrically opposed. Slackware 2 was my first Linux. It didn't do anything stupid.
MacOS was made for him. The classic kind, with one button.
I used to use flatpak, but then it just spontaneously stopped allowing updates one day so I removed it rather than fight with it trying to fix it...
One of the things I like about Linux is that it's common to follow a philosophy of "start with nothing then add what you need" rather than "throw in everything and good luck trying to remove anything problematic".
So that's why you refused to use Ubuntu already, because of Unity and Snap, right?
What relevance does that have to the experience of running Debian, which is what we're actually talking about?
Lightweight solar panels are flexible ones, and they are trash. No solar panels are especially heavy, though, on the scale of heavy trucks.
In my town there are two trucking companies with 10 to 15 trucks that seemingly are advertising for drivers all the time
Yes, they all treat drivers like garbage, and pay them like trash.
I generally buy myself 1 or 2 nice toys a year and well, this took up one slot.
A few rich assholes leaving the roads won't mean they aren't maintained.
The rich assholes who make the decisions deciding the roads don't need to be maintained is a problem. It's tempting to believe that they will want to maintain the system over which they have privilege, but they have shown time and again they have no interest in doing that.
No, your buses are shit. That's your fault, not the fault of buses.
Buses perturb traffic, they can't bypass without their own special lanes which are wasteful and expensive, they do massive amounts of pavement damage compared to enough vans to transport the same number of passengers, they can't fit into many neighborhoods and if they could the streets wouldn't be rated to carry their weight. They are used despite these massive drawbacks only for the exact reason which I described previously.
Then the taxpayer should fund it. (corrected that for you...)
Yeah, no shit. That's where we should be spending our money, making a better future, not on genocides and quests for oil.
Try building a highway in California today.
Buses are shit. We use them literally only because they allow one expensive driver to convey many people by road. Everything else about them is terrible.
Now price in the cost of highway and freeway expansion to cover the additional traffic, the cost of ecological remediation, etc etc
How long does it take a DEC field service engineer to change a lightbulb? It depends on how many bad ones he brought with him.