Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Why? Please, why? There are so many excellent . (Score 1) 136

What "excellent film adaptation" are you talking about? There's one old animated adaptation, and that's is. There's also a movie that bears the same title, but it's apparently a coincidence: nothing except the title and names of some of main characters matches, thus I don't see how it could be relevant to Tolkien's books.

The first thing about adapting a book is reading it at least once, and Peter Jackson skipped that step.

Comment Re:could someone do that to trap an car on railroa (Score 3, Interesting) 136

That's a blockade done against human drivers, who (usually) know how to drive off the railway track, and the blockaders are only protesting rather than actively trying to murder. They stop cars from passing but don't trap them on the tracks.

What GP suggests is that by people simply standing there, the self-driving car's software will stop on the track without aggressively trying to escape.

Here in Poland we have campaign teaching people how to get out of a railway crossing if you get stuck. A bunch of differently-smart humans didn't even contemplate driving through the bar gate, and in some cases didn't even evacuate the car either. The bars are designated to break easily when forced by a car, but somehow in a stressful situation drivers regard them as sacrosanct. As Waymo cars behave that way in about every potentially dangerous situation, I'm afraid they'll do the same when on a railroad crossing as well.

Comment Re:Yeah, sure... (Score 1) 166

They don't need to stall forever -- there are only two important dates: 2026 midterms and 2028. Afterwards, even if Reps win your election, it won't be Trump's administration, and he doesn't care who ends up paying as long as it doesn't interfere with his opportunities for graft. If he can continue his gravy train till 2028 and his and his friends' ill gotten gains don't get taken back immediately after, all is good.

Comment Re:Assuming we are still a democracy in 2029 (Score -1, Troll) 166

Well, it's Dems who have been the more racist party, both historically (1860 1910 1960) and today. But then, both of your parties are very very similar. They do have some disagreements on social issues, and they fight violently _which_ of their donors deserves more of public money, but their core platforms are pretty much the same: insane corporatism.

It's kind of like claiming that brown socialism and red socialism are opposites when they're factions of the same side.

Compare with eg. the country that I just received another lecture to not call them "Russia" -- which went from communism to fascism without any change to internal policies.

Slashdot Top Deals

The finest eloquence is that which gets things done.

Working...