Compared to what was available before, it is quite impressive.

The negative feedback is prompted by the fact that AI is constantly being shoved into every one of our orifices 24/7 by every vaguely tech-related company as if it was the second coming of Jesus. To justify that amount of social pressure, it would indeed have to be quite a bit better than it actually is, and that's why people aren't impressed.

You mean, why does Linus keep agreeing to be interviewed, and then reply to straightforward questions with the obvious answers?

What would you rather he do? Refuse to be interviewed, or maybe make up unexpected answers just to be edgy?

Her wife was giving him the cold shoulder.

A "Disable all AI crap and stop pushing this shit already" switch would be more desirable.

Higher quality slop and approaching pink slip.

... which, to be clear, is a good thing. Working around the compiler is dangerous and a code smell, so it shouldn't be something that is easy to do. It usually indicates that either the compiler's capabilities aren't sufficient to meet your needs (in which case, a better solution would be either a better compiler, or to re-evaluate the wisdom of your approach), or that you are doing something the wrong way and should find a way to do it that works with the compiler, rather than around it, so that you get the benefits of the compiler's co-operation.

of a slightly shittier country.

I have never heard of Vine, but it sounds like Tiktok in much much worse. And since it comes from Dorsey, it's safe to assume it's gonna be shit.

If education was an easy fix, we'd have an educated populace and ClickFix wouldn't be a problem.

The fact is, we live in eternal September. No matter how many people we educate, there's a unending firehose of exploitable n00bs arriving to replace them.

The second link is more interesting (and shows how can users be manipulated in doing that):

In an exemplar campaign from June 2025, when the victim searches for a macOS-related issue — for example, “macos flush resolver cache” — they receive a promoted malvertising website in their search results (Figure 1). Users located in multiple countries — including the U.S., UK, Japan, China, Colombia, Canada, Mexico, Italy, and others — received these advertisements; no victims were located in Russia.
...
The fake help pages provide victims with false instructions for how to fix their problem (Figure 3).

Here it seems that the main problem is that sponsored links from scam actors can appear as first results in a Google search. From then unfortunately... people have already been trained to copy/paste arcane commands in terminal windows to solve problems. This one even encrypts the curl command in a base64 string to look more innocuous.

Well, the thing also masquerades itself as a tutorial to solve problems that people may have, as a sponsored Google result. And solving IT problems often involves typing arcade commands in a terminal window.

If you're going to attempt something outrageous that is almost certain to fail, why not a Space Elevator? On the off-chance you do succeed, that would be a hell of a lot more valuable.

A baby in a cradle is the wrong analogy -- a better analogy is an internal organ inside a body. Yes, you can (with advanced technology and at great expense) remove the internal organ from the body and keep it alive externally for some time, but it's going to be unpleasant for everyone involved, and sooner or later the disembodied organ will wither and die, unless it is returned to the environment it was specifically evolved to live within.

People want helpful AI that doesn't hallucinate, code crap code, tell you to eat glue or commit suicide.

What is this obsession with pedophilia? I'm really getting rather suspicious of MAGA. I suspect your average Catholic priest or Southern Baptist youth pastor thinks about nude children less than most MAGA individuals.