Count the number of emails between a company founder and Epstein before you install their code in your Browser or put your data on their platform.
I mean, spies were spying on you?
Not to mock the victims, but c'mon, Nancy, don't be naÃve.
they are testing them so that we don't have to.
Unfortunately, we do have to. I have to this morning.
I am curious what replaces top notch journalism these days.
This is a story about AP. They haven't been top notch in years, if ever. Their stories are purely surface-level. They're an important part of the picture, but certainly not top notch.
Why glass? Plastic would work just as well.
No, it wouldn't, and that's why. We started using glass on phones for a reason, and that reason is that it works better.
Surely she's overjoyed by a line of nonfunctional pixels and your objection is logical.
No, wait, scratch that. That's all 100% wrong, and you're going nutso.
Send in the Marines or shut the fuck up.
Are you sure that's what you want? It's become clear that they will in fact send the Marines.
In other words, we are toast. Sad because AP was once one of the original newspapers/sites with journalists rather than editorialists but that ship has sailed for most if not all of those outfits. It's hard keeping up with the Kardashians/Jones, whatever.
You're missing the point of the AP, and it's actual composition. I worked at a daily newspaper most of my way through undergrad and knew the ins and outs of the AP better than most.
The main use of the AP was to get international news to outlets who couldn't afford to place staff in places further away from their own location. A great example is any international war, though even big national events (9/11 being a great example) are also places where AP stories are valuable.
The AP carries very little editorial content. Yes there are a few editorial writers who publish there but the volume from them is minimal compared to the objective news reporting. Some people like to claim otherwise but that is from those who aren't actually looking at the body of work on ap.org.
Unfortunately the newspaper model is indeed dying. Many of us are lamenting it and we're not sure what solution could bring it back. Printed news was supported by advertising, both display ads and classified ads. In the 90s your local daily paper likely had 4-8 pages of classified ads, every day. Now the majority of that is on craigslist or facebook. On Sundays your paper had full color printed advertising inserts from over a dozen retailers; many of those retails have since gone out of business and many of the ones who remain don't advertise that way anymore. Online subscriptions can offset a small part of this, but only a small part. Online advertisements are blocked by most readers' browsers, so that isn't productive for newspapers in many cases either.
The tabloid and editorial "journalism" you refer to is successful because it does a better job of selling crap to its audience. Don't confuse it with the professionals at the AP.
Still, Slashdot doesn't have to play along with their weasel wording. For example, "ergonomic collars that deliver an electric pulse" - just say "shock collar". Don't help them whitewash what they're talking about.
The 80186 existed, but the problem was the 80186 integrated various components such as the clock generator and interrupt controller directly into the CPU, but did so in a way that was incompatible with how IBM built the IBM PC. So the 80186 found its way into some not-quite-IBM-compatible computers like some Tandy models and a few other oddballs including some early PDAs. Otherwise, it it was used mostly for embedded applications.
You're a little out of date. Java hasn't really been part of the web for... well, I believe the Java plugin was effectively removed from most browsers a decade ago, and wasn't used much after the early 2000s despite the initial hype.
The web is bloated these days, but Java has nothing to do with it.
It runs MacOS and it's pretty fast, unlike any netbook ever.
Yeah it's got gimped specs but they will be fine for most users, unlike netbooks.
[learn to internet]
Everyone who cares about this already knows this
You don't actually care
So fuck off
Right, that's why my karma is maxed and you have to post anonymously because it actually makes your posts more visible.
Bison don't produce as much methane as cows
general inequality because it factors in all the levels, not just specific boundaries.
In any problem, if you find yourself doing an infinite amount of work, the answer may be obtained by inspection.
