Comment Re:It continues (Score 1) 41
Comment Re:Surely Starship can launch something better ? (Score 1) 24
Reagan and Stockman made much of the 'multiplier effect' to justify their bloated military spending, but actually NASA has the highest multiplier effect of anything the US gov't does, something like 7 to 1. This would indicate NASA's R&D generates enough in taxes that they actually **MAKE MONEY** off the organization. Gerard O'Neil's university class did a study in the late '70s and found, to everyone's astonishment, that just the taxes of the advances in telecommunications generated by the space program would have paid for the entire Apollo program by the mid-'80s.
Comment Re:Surely Starship can launch something better ? (Score 1) 24
By all the gods, conservatives are the biggest frelling cowards on the planet. We spend more than the next ten countries COMBINED, eight of which are our frelling ALLIES, and it's still not enough to calm their fears of the boogieman under the bed.
The US military has two uses currently, as a protection racket for multinational corporations and dictatorships which reward our high officials sufficiently and as mercenaries against the powerless who attempt to resist them.
Comment Re:My intuition (Score 1) 178
My ballot this year was full of bullshit designed to trick me into voting for bad things that would hurt me or bad people that would hurt me and it was a good 40 or 50 minutes spent sorting that out.
Ah, live in Colorado too? Seriously there were something like 14 props/amendments on the ballot this year, most of which were insane right wing copypasta that some megadonor group apparently pushes every year in every state with direct ballot initiatives. The couple that were specific to our state were switching from flat tax to income tax (and a tax cut for everyone making less than $250000) as well as another right wing one to trick people into undoing the income tax change.
Comment Re:If you want to go down a rabbit hole here... (Score 4, Insightful) 32
Don't get mad at Meta, look into how the Supreme Court starting with Sullivan vs New York Times has created a legal environment where public figures like Haidt effectively have almost no recourse to defamation protection unless it is in a very narrow window of extremely blunt bad behavior.
It's the cost of a viable and vigorous free press. If it is easier to sue an win a defamation suit, it becomes a powerful tool to stifle reporting. It's also important to people who post on public forums because lowered protection cultured result in expensive court cases for them as well.
In Meta's case, if they actually did it then that may reach the actual malice level, depending on what was said, but IANAL so who knows?
Comment Re:Newspeak (Score 2) 32
everyone is basically using 1984 like an instruction manual to suppress dissenting ideas and opinions?
Because 1984 was just copying what people were already doing.
Comment Cool strategy (Score 4, Interesting) 32
Comment Re:or maybe not (Score 1) 112
but do you actually have an argument about my take on it?
Before I make an argument, I want to know if you have the intellect to understand it. That's why I asked if you'd read the paper or not.
you keep moving the goalposts. i thought the plan is cost to orbit would eventually make this financially viable and this is just early testing?
You're talking about someone else's goalposts, not mine. I can't think of a real scenario where space data centers are cheaper than land data centers.
the connection with golden dome is interesting. my (uneducated) impression though is that that's just another pipe-dream,
Maybe or maybe not, but it's actively under construction.
Comment Going to school in the dark? (Score 3, Insightful) 125
That's a problem? As someone from a northern climate, it baffles me that the fear of the dark is this powerful. I doubt predators lurking in the shadows are put out by a difference of 60 minutes. "Oh drat! My abduction is foiled by a clock adjustment. Curses!"
Comment Re:maybe (Score 1) 112
Comment Re:maybe (Score 1) 112
so you can't build those datacenters on earth for some reason, and you're going to build them in space?
Datacenters in space are to support Golden Dome. Google is working for the US military. It's not about price.
Comment Re:Surely Starship can launch something better ? (Score 2, Insightful) 24
NASA isn't allowed to "launch something better, cobbled together with modern tech", they can only do what the herd of technophobic lawyers in Congress allow them to do. Unfortunately they put a far, far higher priority on killing people around the world than advancing our species into the future.
2025 Pentagram budget - $750 billion
All NASA budgets since creation combined, including Apollo - $650 billion
2025 Space Farce budget - $32 billion
2025 NASA budget - $25 billion
This is why we can't have nice things.
Comment End Google. (Score 2) 49
I am not an alarmist, and I don't reach for the regulatory hammer on a whim - or, actually ever - but I can't think of more objectionable, destructive behaviour. Build an empire on the backs of the output of the masses, then systematically destroy the value of that world for everybody but themselves. How is this not hijacking click through en masse?
I think Google needs to be stopped. And since the moat is so vast, I think it should be done by government intervention.
Good luck with that, though, on the American front.
Comment Re: Yeah, right... (Score 1) 34
Illegal doesnâ(TM)t mean I donâ(TM)t have the right to record, tho. Government doesnâ(TM)t give rights.