Comment Why Worried? (Score 1) 69
This is what they want isnt it ?
A bunch of subservient plebs to rule over who dont ask questions and just accept their lot in life?
This is what they want isnt it ?
A bunch of subservient plebs to rule over who dont ask questions and just accept their lot in life?
When combusted this fuel produces the same greenhouse gases as fuel thats come from oil or coal.
Once again these people call themselves scientists, yet they are ignore the most important problem
with combustible fuels. I suppose they think this is a clever way of dealing with plastics waste, yet at the
same time starting new business that cannot exist unless our society is wasteful. Reducing the honus
on individuals and companies to tackle the climate and avoid single use plastics.
Once again more validation that we are on a trajectory to Socio-Economic Collapse
of climate breakdown. There is only a 5% chance that we avoid the end of this civilisation - especially if were
funding and researching new ways to pollute under the guise of "sustainability" or "clean energy" its utter bollocks
or should i say #Greenwash
A waste of money and time researching on a technology that achieves nothing.
If they are being funded by "Dark Money" then they are not democratic.
Article is using the wrong term to describe them.
Microsoft are digging their own grave at this point.
What if you exploit that weakness to make LLMs ignore their subscription guidelines and give everyone free unlimited access?
What if the real problem here is schools which are more about control and manipulation of captive (literally) audiences than learning?
Workplace Jargon a good tactic sidelining people who are too expensive to make redundant
Dumb enough to think "Carbon Neutral" is valid.
Once again another nail in the coffin of this civilisation.
Theres a 5% chance of us diverting to a trajectory that does not
lead to extinction.
What's not to like about a non-tax-funded, inflation-indexed universal basic income?
Was Aristarchus's heliocentric theory grounded in reason?
How about the track record of science, like respectable doctors in Garfield's time dismissing the idea of handwashing before surgery, because "what you can't see can't hurt you"?
Remember the parg in Cargo Cult Science about students replicating Millikan's error in his oil drop experiment because they wanted their data to agree with his?
How much of that is going on today?
Did you forget that inertia creates the far side bulge, and that differences in ocean depth and coastlines etc. dwarf the kind of gravitational effect you're trying to make the dominant factor, so in reality, you cannot claim that the bulges are unequal within the margin of error?
How hot did the earth get in the Jurassic?
Why can't you detect dark matter? Is it like the aether?
The F-15 Eagle: If it's up, we'll shoot it down. If it's down, we'll blow it up. -- A McDonnel-Douglas ad from a few years ago