Sorry to rain on your parade, but "Neutrality" wont get us out of this mess.
We are already into our carbon "Overdraft" so-to-speak.
We need a carbon negative civilisation. Net Zero is a #Propaganda term
and its an insufficient target, the targets to achieve "Net Zero" are not even in the right ballpark.

The fact that : "$80 per ton for forest projects versus $1,000 for direct air capture"
is true gives away several key facts.

1) That we will fail - on the grounds that the motivation to solve the problem is to profit rather than prevent our kids dying from respiritory failure, starvation due to failed crops or extrme weather.

2) One of these technologies ( forests ) is proven to work at scale and has done for millenia
        yet were cutting them down faster than replanting them, because its more profitable. Strengthening
        my first point

3) Microsoft see the truth, but the penny hasnt dropped yet, they still think that profiting from disaster
        is a valid stance.

There is no mention of it in the release notes.

Intel support the genocide currently being committed by Israel.
No amount of rebranding can wash the blood off its hands.

If we cannot educate AI's on educational texts then what is the point ?

Maybe some very small pockets or extremophiles will survive, but it is not OUR right do choose their fate, nor is there any coming back from this. This civilisation will be done in 5-15yrs.

At 2 degrees rise the base of our food chain will be unable to survive and be functionally extinct - Coral Reef ecosystems .. Gone.
Even at 2 degrees phytoplankton and oceanic chemistry will be irreversably altered and acidified.
Larger ocean creatures therefore will have no food, they will already be closing in on extinction, through lack of sustinence, but also difficulty in breeding.

By 2030, - just 5yrs away - there will no longer be enough potable water to share round all the humans , or to water the crops we feed to the animals we eat. Something has to go or millions are going to die.

Consider that 2.1 degrees is essentially locked in.
Consider the number of people who essentially dont care, pretend its lies.
Consider the governments we have now elected to steward us through this, and how they are acting.
They tell us we must achieve "Net Zero" , but that is a wholly inadequate target and its too late.
Only net-negative will do - sadly theres no techology that scales or is efficient enough to do this, nor one that wouldnt cause
more Ecocide in the future. Rapid rewilding is the most scalable , effective method - but the efforts so far
have been ill researched, favour monoculture plantations and are not happening enough. Worse were planting forests, calling it "renewable" energy, burned for biomass or sold to ostentatious fools for their fashionable, opulent "wood burning stoves" beleiveing
them to be environmentally friendly. Meanwhile asthma inhalers price continues to rise and in the UK at least 32000 people a year die from air pollution.

Mark My Words, those who dont acknowledge this or will be the ones least equipped to survive the coming years if you cannot see the writing on the wall, perhaps you should go to specsavers, keep capitalism alive and kicking

if things warm to 4 degrees above normal most life will be extinct.
But nobody ever said The Guardian was a reputable rag.

It already has... There have been around 70 documented cases.

Not sure what narrative NPR is following , but its basing its article on a lie.

#BBC is the nations least trusted broadcaster and propagandist.
This is a lie , it was not built for COP it was built for mining vehicles.

Not great either but once again the BBC shows its true racism and untrustworthiness.

The truth is in the product name .

Ok so were now cheering AI with a built in bias they tested on people?
All this proves is that giving peopled biased information works.

In this case the bias is negative bias toward conspiracy theory.
But it could just as easily be done to refute the truth about climate change
or the troubles in the middle east.

Pokemon will not outlive this civilisation

Satya Nadella doesnt know the history of Artificial Intelligence.
If they did, then they would understand were not waiting for a killer app.
The Killer app for AI is games and this is nothing new.

Oh believe me theres a lot of subservient cretins in britain.

"Should all artists get compensation from all AI companies that used their work to build a model?"

You are fundamentally misunderstanding how this works.
Building a "Model" does not include training it

Training the "Model" s the part where someone elses work is needed.

Ergo , you can build a model without infringing on anything.

Studies estimate that an AI model like ChatGPT-4 consumes around 2.9 Wh (watt-hours) per query for inference (i.e., generating responses).

Assuming 1 user uses the service 10 times per week:-
400 million users × 10 queries per user = 4 billion queries per week
4 billion queries × 2.9 Wh per query = 11.6 billion Wh
11.6 billion Wh = 11.6 GWh (gigawatt-hours) per week

11.6 GWh × 52 weeks = 603.2 GWh per year
This is roughly equivalent to the annual energy consumption of 55,000 U.S. homes
(based on an average of 10.9 MWh per home per year).

If the electricity comes from fossil fuels (~400 g CO per kWh), then:

603.2 GWh × 400 g/kWh = 241,280 metric tons of CO per year
This is equivalent to the emissions from 52,000 gasoline-powered cars annually.

This is just for chatgpt.