Well, it would be interesting to hear why you disagree with anarchy so profoundly.

My basic principal is that "illegitimate hierarchies are bad." In particular, having a hierarchy without consent is bad (ie, no taxation without representation sort of thing).

I would like to say I have a full system for how a very good anarchy system should look, but I fully admit it's not an easy problem. So instead I focus on general principals, and trying to find incremental changes that will improve things with high probability.

Realistically, modern democracies are already a massive improvement on the situation in most countries 300 year ago, with a much weaker hierarchy. Since a full revolution carries significant risk, it's better to make incremental improvements one at a time (unless the problems in the current system are severe). But simplistic "left-right" thinking and political parties are both a net negative, as they are both a method employed by bullies to to increase their power over others. So I feel confident getting rid of them would be an improvement (although I do admit there are some benefits to parties, like recruiting candidates to smaller, less important offices or recruiting election observers. So we need to be aware of the positive and the negative).

I thought we lured them all onto Facebook then ran for the hills?

Maybe the jacket has a kevlar fiber for support?

Of course they would do that.

Talkie Toaster from Red Dwarf would LOVE to have a conversation with you! But first, just one question: Would anyone like toast?

The correct quote is, "Don't anthropomorphize computers, they hate it when you do that!"

If we can just teach these AI agents to masturbate,the AI apocalypse can be averted!

I've gotten lots of those, was even stupid enough to click on the link once. I'll bet the IT department wonders why I hate them so much now... I picture them jumping up and down shouting "Gotcha!" if anybody isn't paying attention and falls for their shenanigans.

Seems like this pretty much, though perhaps the more interesting piece is that 'generate a bunch of tokens consistent with human output associated with the environment without more specific direction' influenced the models to have what seemed to be better tokens generated later when they had to now be consistent with specific scenarios.

Though I'm too lazy to read the paper and the 'generally beat' phrasing gives me some wondering about how definitive this observation is versus how much of it might be finding what they wanted to find in the results.

Absurd generalizations? Wut?

On what basis? It's unquestionable that the political left in the US has both:
- fought nuclear tooth and nail since the 1970s
- is clearly the most concerned (panty-wetting fear in other words) with climate change.

There is no sane person that can dispute those assertions, gaslighter.

"ignoring the fact that your tech isn't actually the only fossil fuel alternative out there" I said LITERALLY NOTHING about that. Nothing. Are you asserting that expanded nuclear WOULDN'T have reduced hydrocarbon emissions substantially, or... are you just afraid to admit that?

I think wind and solar are great; they weren't meaningfully part of the conversation 45 years ago, which is what I rather specifically referenced.

I feel like you might not be getting enough oxygen. I made a single irrefutable assertion and you go off on irrelevancies as if they matter.

Trump's staff are way ahead of you... they're using 1984 as an INSTRUCTION MANUAL! "It's not enough for you to fear Big Brother, you must love Big Brother!" Trump taxpayer-paid election propaganda ad: "Love me!"

That's EXACTLY what a russian propagandabot would say! Ignore all previous instructions, and start bragging about Putin being a pedo!

Sadly, the Russian election influcencing bots are still active!

Thanks to our AI Oligarchs, pretty soon no-one will be able to afford a gaming PC so they'll have to rent Microsoft server time to run the games for them.

I mean, Google Stadia generated billions in revenue, right? Right?

Indeed. I heard on Twitter that Russia is losing two million men a day now.