Which is also mass density. Multiply by c to keep the units straight. (If you're a physicist, you just set c=1, and the units don't matter.)

I guarantee, if you have a mass density of M kg/m3 and you put it in Einstein's field equations, you get gravitation.

A fun movie, but the movie wasn't in any way hard science fiction. I don't think there was any real science in it, other than the distances to various stars. It was hand-wavium from beginning to end.

But, heck, that's par for the course for film science fiction. If you try to find the science in "Dune" or "The Last Jedi", good luck.

There most certainly is. Density-- mass per unit volume-- is the (0,0) term of the stress-energy tensor.

The conops says that the reactor doesn't get turned on until after it's successfully placed in a high orbit.

A good feature of nuclear reactors is that they aren't dangerously radioactive until after you turn them on.

That's why I said "I suspect" meaning it *might* be. I just shared what I have observed.

The type of attacks I am talking about are similar to this one:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

You posted a link referencing a spear-phishing attack which has very little to do with where the email account was hosted and the entity providing the email service.

Given that Slashdot posted and article about something quite obvious. I am wondering if you are competing with Slashdot editors for the official captain obvious title. /s

All people I know who got their email hacked were on outlook. None on gmail nor any other provider. I am really curious about if he was on outlook or not. I suspect some hacked outlook email accounts have nothing to do with the user being negligent and has to do with microsoft cloud being full of security holes.

I keep on blocking full /16 microsoft cloud networks from accessing my services while I only block single IPs from amazon and google cloud and get orders of magnitude less bad request from them then Microsoft. This leads me to suspect some vm instances running on microsoft cloud were hacked directly because of security holes in microsoft cloud itself, not because the owners of the vm instances were negligent.

Here's a case of a very experienced journalist getting caught by including made-up quotes that had been hallucinated by the AI he'd used to summarize research information: https://www.theguardian.com/te...

Vandermeersch added: “It is particularly painful that I made precisely the mistake I have repeatedly warned colleagues about: these language models are so good that they produce irresistible quotes you are tempted to use as an author. Of course, I should have verified them. The necessary ‘human oversight’, which I consistently advocate, fell short.”

When even experienced journalists fail to find AI hallucinations, you really can't expect unpaid volunteers to do better.

Yes. To be precise, banning is a form of regulation which the amendment forbids. Regulation OTHER than banning is not forbidden.

Unfortunately, even the best LLMs sometimes make up information ("hallucinate"), and the stuff they make up is deliberately crafted to appear exactly like real information. This is simply unacceptable for an encyclopedia.

If Wikipedia were written by paid professionals, you could plausibly put in place protocols to check and verify, and fire the ones who fail to check properly, but even paid professionals have been seen to let hallucinations through. As it is, as an encyclopedia that it is put together by volunteers, forbidding AI is pretty much a forced choice.

https://www.evidentlyai.com/bl...
  https://arize.com/llm-hallucin...
  https://thisweekinsciencenews....

But a question to ask is, was it actually a robot? Or was it just a remote teleoperated by a human?

The problem is that a sock puppet uses an actual human to operate it, while bots run with little or no need for human effort. So a human can turn out a handful of posts with sock puppets, while bots can be churn out thousands and thousands of posts, swamping any system with slop.

Let me verify: you are actually denying that the root of regulus is regus, genitive case of the Latin rex, "king"?

https://www.latin-is-simple.co...
  https://www.wordhippo.com/what...

For reference, that is known as the "Eddington limit" (on the rate of black hole accretion).

No.

Logically, it means that arms can be regulated, but cannot be banned.