Upcoming? The iPhone 16e was released last year. These are schematics for a phone that has been out for a year.
The problem with this document's release is that it's technical information that was supposed to be kept confidential forever.
I'm assuming this is just an error on the FCC's part, and that they automatically released it after a year. Though with the current administration, Hanlon's razor is getting harder and harder to apply.
This page claims over 400,000 recordings but links to a listing of only 187,034 audio files. I'm guessing the discrepancy is the girth of the suit: IA agreed to take down the files that the plaintiffs could prove were theirs and no money changed hands.
Not too long. It's defense in depth; it's not meant to be outright impenetrable, just very (very) hard to get through.
Someone with enough drive, enough time, and enough resources will eventually put together an exploit chain that doesn't require an invalid tagged memory access. But if that raises the manpower requirement by 10-fold (to pull a number out of my ass), then it makes it that much more expensive to attack a phone. At some point, the Apple juice won't be worth the squeeze.
Given these changes, how does developer identification work? Is there even dev identification at this point?
My understanding is that Microsoft followed Apple for the same reason: a financial trail allows the stores to better authenticate that a developer is who they say they are, and conversely, it makes it harder for bad actors to get into the store. If Microsoft is no longer charging, do they still have an effective means to ID devs and to screen out fakes?
Let's compare, shall we?
This:
Personally, I'm on Team Tables here. Maybe in a decade or three this will be practical.
I heard FAT12 had it beat for raw performance.
"Hello, Ecuadorian embassy? Yes, I heard about the weird shit with the cat, but listen..."
Also possible. OpenAI's models do love their bullet points, and especially having exactly three examples in a list. The catchphrase "math magic" at the end also reeks of GPT-4's didactic blandishment.
Yeah, there aren't a lot of popular map projections that fail that test, unless you perhaps count the polar projection used for the UN logo. I'm guessing that sentence is there as a result of editing; perhaps it originally said equally-spaced parallels (which is true of the Robinson projection) but someone math-savvy was consulted to correct the claim to its current form (without seeing the context) and the maintainer of the page wasn't knowledgeable enough to realise it should just be removed.
The thing is... there have been plenty of outspoken and highly visible survivors of school shootings for decades. How the hell do we exorcise this gray paste of untruth?
In English, "IA" is usually understood to mean "Internet Archive." Only "AI" means "Artificial Intelligence."
Well, if each book has its own docker container...
Hmm. Yeah. You're right. Editorializing by Slashdot commenter fuzzyfuzzyfungus, then!
You're not wrong, but first we must all take two minutes out of our days to laugh at the misfortune of political canvassers, whose methods should be illegal.
System going down at 1:45 this afternoon for disk crashing.
