Almost every time there is an X causes cancer, do Y for a longer life or cut out Z for better health paper published and you look at it, yes, they are technically correct within certain confidence limits. But the amount of that effect is almost more important: if you can live another week out of your allotted 3,000 to 4,000+ by cutting out something you enjoy and look forward to, why would you bother? The last week is not much fun anyway, from what I have seen.
Doing what researchers think this month is best for longevity will not make you immortal but it might make you unhappy. Much of what is promoted as positive and healthy is actually statistically risky in terms of accidental demise, such as running, cycling, etc. but we accept that in the belief that it makes us fitter, which if you are a survivor, they do...