Comment Re:Proprietary software needs to be abandoned. (Score 1) 29
I still have really angry memories of having to change every single function that called a regular expression because all php did was reverse the parameter order and rename the function.
Wait until you learn about Python 3.
Comment Re:Believe it if you will (Score 2) 8
there's a reason for the Hayflick limit
Is there? What is the reason? Let me know, maybe we can win a Nobel together.
Comment Re: Not gonna happen (Score 1) 40
No, AI ist not at all like a spellchecker or a calculator. It takes away the ability to think for yourself and act for yourself. Which in the rund takes away the ability to make decisions in your own. You replace the 'wwjd' armbands with 'wwaid' mental cuffs.
Then so does ever human editor out there. If someone has written the words, has gone over them a few times to rework them, then goes to an LLM and says, "Look this over and suggest corrections", that is no different than going to a human editor. A human editor will go over your work and make suggestions. They will tell you, "This doesn't work" or "Remove this part".
That is taking away your ability to think for yourself in the same way an LLM does. In both cases they are looking at your completed work and correcting it.
Comment Re:Copilot can you respond for me? (Score 1) 86
The thing that smells off to me is that Slashdot itself mangles Unicode every time I paste it into a comment box. So I'm reluctant to accept the implicit premise that software written entirely by humans has already conquered all the easy problems and that AI-generated code must therefore clear some uniquely high bar before we acknowledge it may be useful.
If Slashdot code ever gets open-sourced, I'll fix the Unicode.
Comment Re:They can do a better jon than most people (Score 1) 86
Comment Re:Yes. (Score 1) 86
Comment Re:No (Score 1) 86
Comment Re:It's complexity related (Score 2) 86
Most of them will smugly tell you everyone knows e.g. std::unordered_map is slow (and you're implicitly a moron for using it), change everything to their own implementation on a Friday night then bugger off.
It's amazing how few programmers are willing to use a profiler, even if you show them how and why. I don't know what braindead rock our profession collectively crawled out from under, but it's the rock that is allergic to simple tools to solve the problem.
Comment Re: They write themselves, folks (Score 1) 16
Comment Proprietary software needs to be abandoned. (Score 1, Informative) 29
FOSS software of course also has an upgrade cycle however there are really major differences
- * you can almost completely keep the upgrade cycle within your operating system by only using add no packages for specific specialist software you directly work with
- * you'll normally be able to completely control rollback yourself and be able to see the reason for any upgrade, deciding if it's needed for you
- * provided you use a "free as in beer" system, you won't have software costs for the upgrade
- * you can find many people who can understand and verify what's changing during an upgrade
Comment It won't be "my code" (Score 1) 86
They can certainly write code, but the code they write will be "their code", and I will at best be reviewing it for them. It won't be "my code" because I didn't write it.
Comment Re:They can do a better jon than most people (Score 1) 86
They can do a better jon than most people
Never been to Kabukicho, Japan?
Comment Re:Nothing major. (Score 1) 40
Came here to say this.
"Strike them down, and God will know His own"