Comment Re:Oh, recursive problems? (Score 1) 102
Comment Sure, but... (Score 1) 102
Comment Re:I would be peeing all day ! (Score 1) 169
Comment Re:the sweet sweet middle man (Score 1) 24
Comment Re:the sweet sweet middle man (Score 2) 24
Comment Re:Sure, I could see that (Score 1) 169
Comment Re:Add a little exercise (Score 1) 169
Comment Re:I would be peeing all day ! (Score 1) 169
Comment 500mg or more is bad (Score 1) 169
Comment Re:Computational Demand (Score 1) 62
The demand is real... whether they can scale the workload down to actually make money remains to be seen.
Realistically, they simply need to increase the price which solves the over-subscription problem and expense problem.
Long term there are major benefits to society if they can drive down the cost of energy, cooling, and computational infrastructure to support democratized access to LLMs and diffusion models without bankrupting providers.
At best, that is wishful thinking.
I would just settle for a decent search engine that didn't require me to go to page 3 of search results (and forcing me to verify that I'm a human for daring to click to page 2 of the search)
Welcome to the shiternet. Fuck you because they have you by the balls.
Comment Re:Bullshit. (Score 1) 116
plastic bottle has a raised or imprinted RIC, so they would need to run a separate manufacturing line just for bottles being sold in California.
Where did you get that idea? The issue isn't stuff at the bottom of a bottle, it's what's on the label.
Doesn't that sound at least a little bit silly?
Your argument is what is silly because nobody has complained about the plastic identifier under the bottle. This is all about what's printed on the labels.
Comment Re:Bullshit. (Score 1) 116
So, every plastics maker has to run separate machinery just to provide California something special?
Nope, just the packaging. Seriously, you need to the read the article because you are being a total fool.
Comment Wasted opportunity! (Score 1, Funny) 51
If they were smart then they would have simply sold land to people on a legit looking website and changed the ownership database. If you are morally bankrupt then you should at least avoid being intellectually bankrupt.
Comment Re:Bullshit. (Score 1) 116
California doesn't get to change that for the rest of the nation.
Correct, they are only trying to change it for California. You should read the article closer.