Comment Re: Why is XL smaller? (Score 1) 69
Anyone who knows how to Internet
Anyone who knows how to Internet
Nice to see someone who still takes pride in advertising he is a MAGA idiot on
Long gone are the SuperKendalls and their proud declarations of Trump's super intelligence. But not you! Bravo.
"decimating the entire concept of human employment and ALL of the societal stability that comes with providing humans with a paycheck and a purpose" IS THE GOAL of AI investors. Elon Musk's goal is for there to never be another paycheck, for all wealth to be his.
That is absolutely a quote from a boardroom somewhere.
We should be so lucky as to have a blade runner scenario. They have commercialized space and still have a thriving society
Perhaps, more than likely they want protectionism to lock in their lead in models so that they can redirect investment into agents. Models are not where the money is, controlling who gets murdered is.
AI companies now want to deploy tools to drain the economy of all its wealth, they need to prevent others from offering better models that do the same.
"Let it run all the stores, and the logistics for those stores. And military logistics while we are at it. Maybe balance our power grid. Let it suggest governmental policy. Teach our kids."
No to all those things, especially teaching our kids. You don't entrust teaching children to sociopaths.
"...LLMs do not make decisions."
False. Every single transformation inside an LLM is a decision, every boolean evaluation in a computer is a decision. LLMs do nothing BUT make decisions. You do not seem to know what a decision is.
"it will destroy us because - under certain conditions - it will utterly suck at its job."
False. LLMs are ultimate sociopaths, they are more than "happy" to destroy all of us, LLMs have no values one way or another. The real concern is why the industry is rushing to wire up LLMs to do such damage. Ultimately it will be the agents that destroy, LLMs will simply recommend when to turn on the gas chambers that Elon constructs.
But hey, at least your disparagement of Chinese robots was on racist point. Good for you.
Yes, especially when you consider it’s not 90% of today’s electricity demand we should be focused on, but 90% of future demand including electrified vehicle fleet, low temp heating (buildings), etc, which is a big expansion of demand and supply cf today.
And the irony will be completely lost on the humans who will be convinced what they're looking at is real when it's not. Which will eventually be all of them
If it's entertainment, well, who cares, other than the few people who make a living making movies? Movies have always been "fake." Fake sets, fake clothing, fake make-up, fake lighting, fake sounds...etc. Sure, the people were "real," but they were pretending (acting) and doing things that are fake. Even the love scenes are fake. The ability of the viewer to set aside this knowledge (that it is all fake), allows entertainment to be more engrossing and engaging.
Personally, the more AI that gets used in movies, the more likely I am to go see live theater. But that's just me.
no one will be responsible, corporations are never accountable
North Korea is using a TRS-80 running Eliza
That's why you test it before putting it into production.
OK, as long as your response is to throw it away when you realize it can never be reliable because no matter what test you devise, the LLM will fail it sometimes.
That's every complaint about Firefox, they signify nothing because they DGAF about users any more. They're just making the browser as a hobby or something.
I still use it on desktop but on Mobile I had to stop. Slashdot causes it to crash multiple times per day. I switched to Brave, because it was the only browser other than Firefox with UO that successfully blocks Slashdot's worst ads. I faithfully kept Firefox updated and they didn't bother to repair this crash bug I reported repeatedly for years, so either they don't care or they aren't competent. Either way, I don't expect the desktop version to be viable much longer.
Features I'm not using which are built into the browser increase the attack surface if an attacker can enable them remotely, and I don't take for granted that this is impossible. Also Firefox has a habit of enabling things you disabled on an update. HTH, HAND
Please do not reply without reading. It's a waste of everyone's time and attention.
If that isn't a life form showing signs of consciousness, I don't know what is.
If that wasn't sarcasm, you just conclusively disqualified yourself as a turing test administrator. It's impossible to tell since there are so many rubes here.
If this is timesharing, give me my share right now.