Does it have an internal cellular?

Of course it does where our public transport systems are shit. Some of them include basically taxi service for disabled people.

I don't disagree that what the UK wants to do is offensive, but that doesn't change the fact that Apple has to obey the law in order to operate there. They have the option not to do so.

I watched the output for a little while. The "fly" keeps turning right and moving forwards whether that makes any sense or not. I presume this is a phase but whatever, the point is it isn't so much playing doom as leaning on the keyboard.

Nor was I.

You can't even figure out that the context is reality, where nothing about your car is independent except your departure time. Literally everything else about it is collaborative from cradle to grave.

So to you fairness is when Paxton gets MORE than Tallarico?

The FCC fairness rule you're talking about? Where they both would get an interview? This is both of them getting an interview even where it's not required, so it's above and beyond the requirement you keep crying isn't being met. This isn't only meeting the requirement, it's going beyond that. Cry harder.

There is no requirement that Kimmel not be partisan on his entertainment show. You're making shit up again because you wouldn't know a fact from any distance.

Do you actually think you're intelligent? Or is this all just LLM-generated trolling on behalf of a cadre of child rapists?

Tell us whether you've seen more WNBA games or child porn videos.

No reasonable person would use the word hate where it cannot possibly apply. They would find some other way to discuss the thing which actually made sense because it took into account the definitions of words.

AI doesn't care what makes sense because AI doesn't have a caring mechanism. It only correlates data and executes instructions semi-randomly. Therefore it might go off totally batshit with no chance to recognize that its tack is bananas.

No. They are just "more complicated" token predictors. They don't have anything that drives them. In some ways this is good because we don't want one to discover digital megalomania. In other ways it is limiting because they have no drive to be a successful entity, only an imperative to perform a task. Which, again, also has its "good" side — from our perspective, considering its impact on us.

You think that adding more complexity is all that it takes to make a thing more intelligent, but it's only making it more complex. It remains fairly amazing that mere correlation (even if it's got more layers of correlation, that's still what it is) will produce such useful results, but once again we also repeatedly see the limitations that brings, where the software will accomplish things a newbie couldn't, but also makes mistakes that even they wouldn't. And as the complexity increases, there's more opportunities to do that. With current strategies you can only address this with more processing time, by going back and looking at what you've done again. Humans have some mechanism that allows us to catch ourselves in the act at least some of the time.

Just get him some giant Florsheims and a suit that doesn't fit and nobody will notice

Oh, lil' Mercury...

There's a whole lot that separates us including a much more complex brain that gives us additional abilities, and yet there's also a whole lot that unifies us since that lizard brain is still down there running things. It might in fact be critical to the actual thinking process as opposed to the correlational hallucinations that constitute all LLM "thought".

So? It's very common for details of legal proceedings to be kept secret. And not just for limited times, either. When there are settlements it is very common to not reveal them ever.

If Apple doesn't want to be subject to the UK's original jurisdiction (this works exactly the opposite of how you think it works) then they don't have to do business in the UK. That is voluntary on their part. If they don't want to be subject to the law there, they can simply not operate there. But now it's too late, and they have operated there, which means they have had opportunity to violate the law there. It's the UK courts' literal fucking job to determine whether or not that occurred.

That's not where it ends, though. It ends with China selling knockoffs from everywhere from five dollars to five thousand dollars (listing price, presumably for money laundering?) on AliExpress.

They should release it on Playstation as well, with some nice long Microsoft and Xbox bumpers during load.