Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?
Get HideMyAss! VPN, PC Mag's Top 10 VPNs of 2016 for 55% off for a Limited Time ×

Comment Re:What a mess (Score 1) 416

Hillary has praised many dictators, including Putin, and supports Iran.

Reagan supported Iran with cold hard cash and he's seen as the equivalent of a Saint.
Going back even more there's "good old Uncle Joe Stalin".
People in politics just keep on saying this stuff. Look at how there is hardly a bad word for China for example.

I suggest you look at what very much appears to be blatant bribes from Pfizer associated with dropping the penalty against them or a pile of other things instead of such distractions which apply almost totally across the board.
Who seriously was proposing getting involved in the Ukraine? Anyone?

Comment Re:This confirms my previous speculation (Score 1) 416

yeah, but these days the plurality of people are independents and not actually democrats or republicans. A fact that both parties like to ignore.

The 2 party system is a joke

So much so that a speech by Obama's wife only needs the word "dignity" to be removed to work perfectly when used by Trump's wife :)

Comment Re:Doing Trump's work for him (Score 1) 416

How the fuck do you mange to keep twisting things like this?

The twist is red tape in the bedrooms from the "freedom" and "small government" party. For added hilarity there's the strange fear of the impossible with worries about Sharia law by the people who are actually trying to enforce something similar with pointless red tape in the bedrooms.
The Republican party was not always like this. People keep on using "1950s values" as an insult but they've actually gone backwards in some ways since then due to a fringe taking things over.

Comment Re:Rethink (Score 1) 181

Of course Putin is doing his best to revive those old days.

You are thinking far too short term. He mostly wants to revive the days of Tsars that dramatically increased the size of the Russian Empire, but he also has Stalin's library in his office.

A Trump v Putin game of chicken does not sound like a wonderful thing, I must admit...

They are both authoritarians but Trump is very much Putin-lite. Trump is like a spoiled trust fund child of Putin that would like to be thought of as being as great as his dad but has nothing to use other than half of his dad's book of speeches. A better analogy would be comparing Henry Ford to Edsel Ford (with apologies to both - similar politics but Putin is a murderous thug). A Trump versus Putin game of chicken would result in a Putin win every time. Trump may talk like a gangster but Putin has dealt with gangsters and had them killed (as well as effectively being a gangster himself at one point).

The change of management at Fox could drastically change the way Trump is seen by the world. Trump is a lame puppy in business compared with Rupert Murdoch and Rupert likes to be a kingmaker just as Hearst was. Rupert's contempt for Trump (as seen on his other outlets) could end up coming through on Fox in a major way if Rupert can get some advantage from Hillary and decides to bring his media empire down on her side.

Comment If VW's claims are really true, (Score 1) 57

then the bastards must be kicking themselves in the ass. It hasn't taken them very long to come up with a fix; if they'd spent the time to do that back in the development cycle, they could have saved themselves a shitload of money - not to mention all the damage to their reputation since they got caught trying to pull a fast one.

As the old engineering saying goes, 'never time to do it right, but always time to do it over'.

Comment I sometimes post anonymously, (Score 1) 299

because I've already moderated before discovering that there's a post I want to reply to. I think it works out well; it still allows me to say what I want to say, but it doesn't boost my karma, and what I post starts out at 0 so it has to have some merit to be seen by the majority.

I always read at a -1 threshold, and it's surprising the number of AC comments I find down there that I mod up. And from 0 on up, I find a LOT of worthwhile comments that might not have seen the light of day if AC's weren't allowed. So yes, I think allowing anonymous comments should continue.

Slashdot Top Deals

"A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked." -- John Gall, _Systemantics_