What's needed is a web of trust moderation system which can be used to filter email, Usenet, and social media sites. Go forth and write!

They don't want any competition for their own malevolent disinformation, which is redundant.

And she's right, she has herself as an example.

Unfortunately she's incapable of understanding this means that she is a terrible parent.

This place is run by crypto thugs who are also invested in AI. It's not a surprise when they mod down posts which threaten their portfolios.

"The "people" presumably the public have zero clue what work you directly produced. They see a road was built. They elected an official who ran on a policy of building roads. No one cares if "Arrogant-Bastard" (LOL, thanks, I don't often get a chuckle when looking up who I'm talking to, though you don't come across as one :-) ), did the soil load calculation of the road."

This is not only false in that there are people who care, but it's also false in that they have a right to know and they can get that information via FOIA request in the US.

The Internet is by definition a network of networks. Therefore how you define it will be defined by how you define networks. However, since a reasonable definition of a network includes all of the devices on that network, it is also reasonable to include the functions provided by those devices.

The internet IS bloodsucking corporations, that's the rub. In early days it was a bunch of schools. Under their benevolent stewardship, the Internet flourished. When its mission was research, it was healthy. As corporations took over providing the backbone, it became ever more malignant. This should lead to obvious conclusions about the influence of the profit motive on all things, but too many people have been brainwashed by prosperity theologists to get it.

No need to use tokens for that, just detect keywords and link them to ads. Which makes it even weirder that they are failing

But then they own a bunch of unprofitable companies, and what's the end game? Even not charging themselves markup for hardware won't make the industry profitable.

"Google's problem is that it doesn't have a platform to embed ads in."

Wat

Does Google still omit the AI results if you include a few swear words in the query?

$99 billion in cash reserves will probably insulated them from most of the AI bubble pop.

Ignorance, really. The ads for Muse do stuff like asking it to help you shop for gifts and other things, as well as deal with customer service agents if you get wrongly billed.

So it's kind of obvious they gave up the password so the agent could peruse the account charges and then do stuff like challenge them on your behalf.

The way the ad makes it seem is that it happens automatically and takes a few minutes, instead of spending hours on the phone trying to deal with the charges.

So people are being pulled into it simply for the convenience factor.

Tell us you didn't understand the statement without telling us.

Double down on telling us you understand nothing about this conversation. You actually manage people? Here's how it works: Until AI can pay for itself, it's a net negative. You're chained to a rock sitting on a melting ice floe.

Yes, they are, and nuclear has shitty lifetime emissions if you count the mining and processing and transportation and decommissioning activities.