u b from Gen-LB: Lawn Booters

and like instant gra

...if there are only toothless penalties on the plutocrats who lie and cheat, the data will useless. They like to hide the reasons they cut staff to keep investors from knowing what's really going on.

Another way to say this: any bill that actually punishes slimy plutocrats will likely never pass.

Our generation might not like it, but if our kids get used to it, insects are a great food source. Same phylum as crabs.

95% of countries have agreed to not swipe land. It's the 5% that cause all the headaches.

All Elon's solutions somehow involve space:

Back itches? His satellite emits a laser beam on the itchy part via an app.

Federal budget deficit? Fund Elon's asteroid mining bots to bring precious metals back to pay down the debt.

Lonely? His .20c "WarpShip" will take you to those green Orion babes. Double-Dee's are a 30% markup. 3-breasts are +60%.

> Yes, by all means, let's take our biggest mistake and make it a global problem.

Warming is already a global problem. When enough side-effects kick enough nations, they'll start to care and cooperate.

> Well, since this is going to cost money, it wont happen. Period.

Putting ocean sprayers on say 1 in 10 container ships is relatively cheap.

You know it would be dirt simple for Musk to lubricate them to have his rockets selected for contracts.

"What's all this extra stuff?"

Vendor: "Nah, nothing."

...if it were, MS would surely tell us. Hackers would never append malware to an install packet.

And yes, you can call me Shirley, I live in a blue state and like it!

https://www.politico.com/magaz...

...has risk. An international election system should be set up whereby each nation gets votes proportional to their population, perhaps with a slight bonus to help smallbie's, similar to US's Electoral College.

And if its impact leans regional, then countries close to the region also get a vote bonus.

I have a feeling we're going to need this system; prevention and restraint ain't goin' so well.

So my verbal description confused readers, I get that. I'll try again using examples.

This site hosts an Image-to-Triangle-Converter.

I invite you to play with it. You can see it's possible to convert any 2D image to bunches of triangles. The more triangles one uses, the better the resolution. The defaults on this site are not high-resolution, but high-res can be achieved by using much smaller triangles. (The optimum number of vertices per polygon and polygon sizes is an R&D project.)

So you agree any 2D image is "polygonizable"? Good.

Now extrapolate this idea to a movie. Rather than each frame be an independent triangle (polygon) set, an extrapolation algorithm connects similar "adjacent" polygons in each frame. Think of the frames as stacked on top of each other like a card deck.

In most cases, Frame n + 1 will be very similar to Frame n, giving us gradually-changing candidate connection lines. The extrapolation algorithm will give us a best fit, or best "economical" fit in terms of vertex conservation (depending on chosen resolution settings). The end result would be 3D polygons that together make up a giant cube: the Polycube. Our proverbial card deck is kind of melted together into one big "card cube".

(The boundary between "cut scenes" won't end up sharing very many polygons, but this is not a problem.)

If one digitally takes a "slice" of this cube, they get a frame of the movie. Note there are infinite slice points such that the frames don't have to be displayed in fixed intervals. The slice spacing would be determined by a particular display device, as each is capable of different display rates.

Make sense? If not, which phrase isn't clear?

Just because the writing was not clear doesn't mean it's schizo. It's just very hard to describe the concept using only words.

I invite help. Thank You.