I would think that China has that access. I know of several large corporations and one smaller state that have this access.

What a dumb statement. If you are trying to defend the indefensible (Microsoft), try at least to sound a bit plausible.

So? The Linux kernel folks patched within hours or days. And these vulnerabilities are unlikely to crop up again. You are comparing apples and oranges. Also note that building a big, bloated KISS violation of a "kernel", as Microsoft does, certainly counts as "not caring about security". The only way to get good security in software, and even more so in kernels, is by simplicity. Microsoft certainly knows that. But raking in the dollars is far more important to them.

So ask yourself: Why are you defending Microsoft with invalid arguments?

There are also other master's degrees besides the clearly negative-value MBA. For example, you can get a STEM one.

This is also the users that tolerate this crap and ask for more, at least some of them. Yes, MS has no honor, integrity, decency or skill, but they are getting away with it because they do not get called out.

And a rather large part of it is user incompetence. Not much of a surprise.

FVWM had these like 30 years ago...

That is nominal GDP based on a very weak currency.

In PPP terms, Iran's GDP is about $1.2T, about the same as that of Illinois or the Netherlands.

Then the future will belong to China.

Better start learning Mandarin.

Indeed. I pay $20 per month for Cursor, and it works great.

Why should I pay 15 times that much to be Elon's beta tester?

Of course not, she was 007, not James Bond.

Ugh, totally not interested in a Bond movie like that. They should just go back to being a real adventure/action movie, start with an action sequence and have a megalomania bad guy. And have it set back in the 60s.

Well. I tech mostly IT Security and these students may be different. While I have a class where they hand in homework for the grades, I do result-discussion with all groups and if they have no clue, they fail that one. Has not been an issue so far. For written exams, they can bring as much paper as they like, but no AI.

If what you teach is more about voicing and exploring ideas and not about hard reasoning (in engineering, your solution does not work if not carefully constructed), LLM use would be a massive problem, agreed. LLMs cannot do reasoning at all, but they can find a lot of related things for a query.

Seriously, in developed nations doing something like this is illegal. This is a 3rd world move.

Clearly the Google LLM investments are not panning out...