If you charge a small fee for account creation, you can get almost all the benefits of having someone's social security number and picture ID, for almost none of the cost of having to deal with such a toxic "asset". You can even offer degrees of anonymity when taking payment.
Now obviously, someone will decide to spend 5000 dollars on bots to advertise or delegitimize voting, but that would happen even if you had the picture ID thing going on. None of this gets around having to police your platform to remove comment bots, vote bots, etc. You still have to do that. But charging 5 bucks to 25 bucks to make an account creates a massive barrier to the unlimited influx of captcha solving AI chatbots, because bad actors simply can't afford to pay the amount required to flood your database will advertisements and propaganda.

They really are not. I mean, there's some post here or there that is probably botted or like AI assisted or something, but it's absolutely nothing like bluesky, reddit, and worst of all, twitter. Those places are robot playgrounds.

This isn't news. Remember how it was reported the last time it happened?
https://www.thedailybeast.com/...

Proton mail has never, despite what is being claimed, promised to not store your IP address. A subpeona can compel them to do so, and it has in the past, and this will continue to happen. If your security depends on your IP address not being unmasked, you need to use at least one VPN.

If you self hosted then the subpeona would be delivered to your ISP, which will happily comply- likely quicker than protonmail.

NO EMAIL SERVICE WILL COMMIT A CRIME FOR YOU

If you only connect through VPNs, then the email service will provide the VPN's IP. If the VPN is then contacted and they have no logs, then they will not be able to correlate the IP to a user. This is your only chance at anonymity under these circumstances: some VPN plus some private mail service that never knows your real IP address. Note that proton is a strong choice here because if you previously connected via your real IP they won't have a log of that; they'll only start saving your IP when they get a warrant. There are other equally strong private email choices, but ALL OF THEM WILL DELIVER YOUR IP IF THEY KNOW IT.

It's a bit of a moot point. Systems that aren't receiving general OS updates wouldn't receive updated bootloaders anyhow. So they wouldn't need the updated certificates that allow for bootloaders signed after June 2026.

It gets a bit tautological, but only systems that are getting updates need updates.

It lacks an appropriate number of ports and doesn't support DisplayPort.

USB DisplayPort alt mode says hello. Every rear USB-C port on the Mac Mini is also a DisplayPort. Just as it is on all of Apple's laptops.

Thunderbolt is a garbage, proprietary Apple standard.

Thunderbolt is an Intel standard. And in the case of Thunderbolt 4, it's just an additional set of feature requirements over base USB4, where those features are optional. In other words, TB4 is a superset of USB4.

It wants your email, and lets you set a username.
But it doesn't give you a password.
Now when you want to login- or really, as these things go, every fucking time- you get to go to your email and dig out their confirmation. It behaves like a site to which you have forgotten your password each and every time. Total ass.

Incorrect. If a million people signed on with my actions above, only effective solutions would be considered. While that won't happen, there are plenty of cases where the threat of people acting out of spite keeps those in power in line to at least some extent. Spite is great.

Don't forget spite. If they get rid of first class for carbon reasons I will personally find a way to add 10x more carbon than whatever their estimated percapita carbon savings is, even if it takes burning a barrel of oil in some fireproof place. These people can cram all this performative bullshit up their asses. You want to reduce carbon, make it so that if I buy furniture it wasn't grown in Canada shipped to China processed into furniture pieces shipped to somewhere to be clicked together and qualify for a "made in" tag then shipped everywhere. A million effective centralized solutions and they keep doing the "it only counts if you personally suffer" narrative. Pants-on-head retarded.

"The purpose of a screensaver was"....
A live feed so that you could be sure all the migrating toasters had safe flights.

In many cases Home is preinstalled. Obviously you can do a full install with a better version that you buy, but I am pretty sure that takes a lot longer.

This is how you install Windows, the only safe way. Obviously Windows is an ever-growing problem, but don't talk shit on the utilities that preserve some of its Linux-like features ("not having to log in to microsoft.com to use your computer" being a top Linux-like feature).

Wait are you saying it DOESN'T start in the working directory either? I thought you were saying that everyone should run from commandline and never need a second thing. Not that it fails to support that either. It didn't even occur to me at all that they wouldn't support that. Outrageous.

Who fucking cares about your trivial use case? A competent program solves yours effortlessly, starting a filepick in the working directory is a sensible default and not what is being discussed.

The problem is for anyone who starts it from an icon, or who works from multiple subdirectories (for instance, when I edit with LibreOffice I'm in three subdirectories often, or if I'm building an iso in a CD burning program. Obviously filepickers should not be written assuming that you have one working directory and you started it from a commandline.

A filepicker should allow you to type /home/(yourname)/whateverA/whateverB and then display that list. Outside of shit that the GNOME devs have touched, all of them have done so for decades without issue. And no, memorizing Ctrl+L and then having to type /home/(yourname)/whateverA/whateverB/Long File Name Of Thing.xml doesn't cut it- I want to browse that fucking directory.