Ah. That is why no investor is willing to support this venture. Makes sense given his business history.

First, it is called "baseload". And second, nuclear is so bad at baseload that 70% is the absolute maximum a grid can tolerate before it becomes unstable. And you need fast regulation energy in the size of your largest nuke, which is very expensive. Because while wind and solar can be planned, a nuke SCRAMing comes with no warning at all.

You have been conned. It starts with careful creation of benchmarks. It continues with providing stunt after stunt and evermore grand claims. And you fell for it.

Yes, they apparently really think that. Makes me think they have no general intelligence themselves.

So, I am not a mathematician, I am a CS PhD. It looks to me as if you have no clue how an LLM works and what it can and cannot do. And some others (the ones you quote) seem to be subject to the same limitations. Note that even a Fields Medal does not prevent you from cluelessly shooting your mouth off about a topic you are not an expert in.

I merely state the actual scientific state of the art. And that is that we have no clue how the human mind works. Believing it is all just known (!) Physics at work is called "Physicalism" and it is a quasi-religious belief, not Science. But a lot of people have trouble with unknowns and hence make it either-or. As you just did and which I did not.

So let me repeat, if you insist that the human mind is based on purely known physical effects, please provide scientifically sound evidence for it. I am still waiting. If you fail to provide evidence, then you have belief, not truth.

It is fascinating which people get math degrees these days. Apparently logical thinking is not a requirement anymore.

Ok, let me spell it out for you: The information was out there and could be combined in a purely mechanical, no-insight-required way to provide the answer. Nobody cared enough to find it and try that. Is that clear enough or are you still bereft of understanding?

You sound like a _really_ clueless zealot. No, root access has never been a "security hole" in most contexts. That claim is deranged nonsense.

That is not the topic under discussion.

Even more obvious than what the nuclear bros usually push, I take it. Well. With the demented things investors are willing to finance these days, they must have really, really, really screwed up their pitch.

If you are a mathematician, you should be able to see the difference between "nobody cared enough" (my claim) and "no one cared" (your gross mis-statement of my claim).

Ah, yes, the deranged claim that we know how the human mind works and it is purely mechanistic. You just excluded yourself from rational discussion by pushing a quasi-religious dogma with no supporting scientifically sound evidence.

Seriously, you "AI believers" are not one bit smarter than the Jesus-freaks.

You can only think about eating, don't you.

Despite what some people claim, desktop Linux on the desktop has never been dead and is slowly getting more ground. 5% of Steam users is a _lot_ of people. Far more than needed to prove viability.

Likely because they have other things to do that are more important. Seriously, digging though old stuff will occasionally lead to some discovery. That is all that happened here.