Soo, and the kids are responsible and need to suffer for their parent's decision? You are one special repulsive asshole.

Right. An aircraft of the state flag carrier or France, operating the product of a state subsidized aircraft manufacturer, crashed because capitalism.

Also, commie airplanes never crash.

This incident required the combination of an incompetent crew and a faulty design. Without both, that particular flight would have ended without incident.

So the fault is shared, and the real criminals are in the boardrooms.

Indeed.

That moron? Visionaire? What are you smoking?

Always funny when the deniers turn out to be illiterate...

Assholes like Musk will never be willing to pay more taxes for something like this. People like him can never get enough. Hence he and others try to keep people quiet with "you will be cared for" until it becomes impossible to hide that this is a lie, but it will be too late to really do anything.

"Smart" != "moral". Some of the most evil fucks have been pretty smart. Obviously, to be a smart evil fuck, you have to ignore some things, but high intelligence does not come with the skill to apply it competently and equally to all questions that arise.

Not true at all. LLM-type AI is fare more limited as even the dumbest fuck. The only thing it has is a stellar knowledge base. But actually doing things? Not so good. And understanding things? Zilch.

All the people fawning over LLMs do not really understand them or what they can do. Essentially it is somewhat better search with an NLP interface. Nice, but not a game-changer.

Indeed. As a group, humans are incapable to sanely evaluate individuals. The ones with the most money and power are almost always the scammers and the scum.

That crap is not even worth an answer. But thanks for identifying yourself as a clueless true believer.

Pick any two. I guess we know what choice Google made.

"Business"-oriented people hire not by competence but by fame. One reason they are primarily a problem.

Good point. Obviously, a counter example is very simple in "proof structure", especially as it does not need to tell you anything about what an optimal result would look like.

I guess Mathematicians will continue to have good job opportunities after all.

As to what that LLM does, there are a lot of non-statistical tools it could be using. Obviously, if they tell us, say, "the LLM handed 100'000 possible counterexamples to Wolfram Alpha and Wolfram Alpha picked the single one that was not nonsense", that kind of would destroy the picture they are trying to paint of their product. On a related topic, I am beginning to suspect that Claude Mythic may be running very conventional tools to help it find bugs in code.

That seems to be a newer thing. I had some other problems maybe 1-2 years ago and Brave fixed them. I do not mind using different browsers for some specific sites. Still, good to know, thanks.