Comment Re:Not just data centers (Score 1) 74
If a vehicle has an effective range of 200 miles or less and it's putting up 250+ miles per day, it ain't just charging overnight.
If a vehicle has an effective range of 200 miles or less and it's putting up 250+ miles per day, it ain't just charging overnight.
Are you saying the FCC can't withdraw certification of a device at a later date?
The FCC has been interfering with our ability to use communications gear for many many years. You'd think you'd be used to it by now.
The FCC should probably require open firmware. That would take out a lot of the hassle of securing network devices.
If they weren't ripping people of with every purchase there would no need for a "discount". I was the "guy" who was forced to replace our really nice Commodore Pet computers with that crApple BS in HS. Apple never did anything for the schools that they didn't get paid for. Their software SUCKS, their networking SUCKS. In an effort to be "cool" and trendy apple has made supporting their stuff annoying time consuming.
GM's future is so dull that they sold their shades. A company that has no future needs very few employees. If the US allowed Chinese imports the US companies would be gone already.
See above reply, that ain't gonna work except for the lightest of light duty vehicles.
How? Commercial vehicles can rack up hundreds of miles per day depending on the nature of the work. And if they gotta haul then range goes way down. They'll be plugged in during the day.
It's going to be particularly unpleasant for those using Graviton instances at AWS. You can't buy off-the-shelf replacements that actually compete well (yes I know about Ampere but Amazon is ahead of them, even after the ARM buyout).
The US has been spying on European leaders and people for years, and American cloud providers were just as much a liability during the Biden Presidency as they are now.
What the EU countries are doing is decades late.
Commercial electric vehicles will charge as needed. Not just at night.
If they do invade, EVERYONE is in troublel. But it seems as though Xi has been purging his party ranks and generals, meaning that something is very wrong in the CCP structure and in the PLA. The current CCP plan seems to be to work on the KMT and force a peaceful reunification under PRC rule since the PLA may just not have the readiness or capability. Xi may be hyperparanoid, but he definitely will not risk a botched invasion of Taiwan especially when he knows he can purge anyone that dares to criticize him for taking too long to deal with the RoC.
In my opinion, the only way the invasion continues on schedule is if the PRC gets their shit together in very short order, which doesn't appear to be happening. Rot runs deep in the CCP and PLA, and China may never fully recover from that.
China has its own problems. They may not be quite as big a threat as people imagine, especially now that their cheap oil has been cut off and their belt & road initiative has started to fall apart. Not to dismiss them entirely, but if they don't invade Taiwan next year then you know they're in trouble.
Does the Mac version have all the malware in it from last year?
https://www.pcmag.com/news/chi...
(probably not, but it would be funny if it did)
The Feds already clamped down on Sudafed, diesel + fertilizer, bump stocks, suppressors, sawed-off shotguns, and any number of other things which can bee potentially dangerous. And in many cases they did so via executive fiat.
Human beings were created by water to transport it uphill.