Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re: I'm Still Not Seeing It (Score 1) 34

If it's actually just a search tool, then it's not replacing any coders right?

Depends on what you mean.

E.g., I've given ChatGPT API documentation, and a sample implementation in one language, and asked it to give me a sample implementation in another language. And what it gave me worked, with minimal tweaking to use in my project.

Could I have done it myself? Sure. As fast? Heck no.

(And yes, I still did all the same code review, QA, etc. that I would have had to do anyway, even if I had sweated out every line myself.)

Comment Re: I'm Still Not Seeing It (Score 1) 34

Today, I spent three hours studying the API and finding the relevant calls. I had a fully functional Python script running in 30 minutes and the task completed two hours later.

... THOSE are the parts you're supposed to use AI with ... if the API docs are online 3o will do that much for you.

It's like you just posted on stackoverflow for a fully working solution then gave up because nothing you copy pasted works right. It's about the dumbest possible way to use an information tool.

Treat AI like an information index, just like SO, just like a search engine, it's that kind of tool. It's a very, very good index that sometimes points at exactly what you asked for but you still search, read, integrate, repeat. What you tried and failed to do, vibe coding, is like irresponsibly farming your work out to an intern. Go ahead and try that. You get the results you deserve and it doesn't make the intern useless, you're using them wrong. No, it doesn't replace you, that's not how you use it.

Right. We also don't even know what he did.

E.g. did he even give the LLMs the API documentation, or point them to it? Or did he just expect the magic 8 ball to spit out the right answer from the ether? Did he give the LLM a sample implementation, even if in some other language?

I see so many smug posts from people who don't even know that they are just saying "I don't know how to use LLMs".

Comment Re: they take anything now (Score 1, Flamebait) 49

What if you legalized drugs? How much are you willing to pay to force your fickle, arbitrary moral agenda on others?

How many drugs did you have in mind?

Weed has been legal where I live for several years now. Hasn't reduced crime any ... just increased impaired drivers.

Comment Re:Yet another mistaken made by gov employees (Score 1) 110

U.S. Education Department introduced a temporary rule requiring students to show colleges a government-issued ID to prove their identity

This should have never been an optional thing to begin with. I went to college back in 92 when I first arrived to the US only a year. Not I only I had to show my ID, I had to drag my ass to the FA office dozen times, each time showing my ID, before I was issued the aid check. Who the hell would paid any kind of money to anyone without verifying the recipient identity? That doesn't make any sense!

Exactly.

And lol, no, ceasing to require ID was not a "mistake". It was a deliberate policy.

(And merely wanting to require ID again is supposedly evil fascism ...)

Comment Re:Wait, I know this one! (Score 0) 172

Can anyone help jog my memory? When government and corporate interests merge, and you can't tell where corporations stop and government begins...what's that called? I'm sure I had a class on that once. Some kind of political movement. I can't remember what it's called but it was started by the editor of Italy's largest socialist newspaper back in the 1920s. Anyone know?

So my chemistry and physics instructors at Naval Nuclear Power School decades ago (who were also direct input officers) were fascists? Who knew!

Comment Re: As a former officer... (Score 2) 172

Lt. Col is the typical end rank of a 20 year career.

You should meet some military physicians.

They are made officers (we used to call them "direct input officers", dunno if they still do) and given inflated ranks for two reasons: to pay them sufficiently, but also to get them within the military accountability structure.

Comment Re:As a former officer... (Score 2, Informative) 172

...may I say: this is offensive. They can be overpaid consultants, but gifting them unearned rank...stinks.

Yawn. Direct input officers have been a thing forever. Heck, I had to salute my physics instructor at nuclear power school, who was just some young teacher chick who would never deploy anywhere.

And yes, it's to pay them. And get them within the military accountability structure (the more important reason).

Comment Re: Naval organization is the problem (Score 1) 134

"Most of them will spend 20+ years on a given ship, and will know every system intimately."

Interesting. The stories that some of these Warrant Officers could tell!

One of the reasons that officers are rotated in a modern military is so that no centers of power grow to where the troops are more loyal to a commander than to their government. Limiting the rank to WO's sort of gets around this problem. Supervisory authority, perhaps, but no command authority.

I wonder how large of a navy this could scale to?

Slashdot Top Deals

Always try to do things in chronological order; it's less confusing that way.

Working...