Comment Re:Is it? (Score 1) 50
So do low budget film makers.
So do low budget film makers.
What genocide?
1) Which*
2) This one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
It seems pretty obvious that you wouldn't give an award to a machine because there is simply no purpose in it. How would that even work? Would someone bring up a server rack to the stage? This is really a no-brainer.
Hey, don't lump us stupid and incompetent basement dwellers in with those fascist assholes!
We already have actors and writers who do what they do perfectly.
Do they? People want actors and writers that will do it for less money and those seem to be in short supply.
We need AI to do stuff we can't do
This is not how technology has traditionally been used.
* Car destroyed the horse market
* The printing press put scribes out of work
* Photocopy machines put typists out of work
* Computers eliminated the card catalog
* Electronic synthesizers are steadily eliminating the use of musical instruments
Why did these all happen? Because they are cheaper solutions to problems that were already solved. So tell me, what makes you think it should be any different for actors and writers?
Don't get me wrong, I think this is an idiotic use of the technology and a total waste or resourced but I also cannot deny the reality that economics is the driving force of technology.
AI agents should be exploited by websites because AI agents themselves are exploiting the websites. I see no downsides to someone causing an AI agent to self-destruct.
If a virus only infects 50% of people, that doesn't mean "nobody is getting infected". The inability for people to see nuance is annoying. 50% certainly is not 0% and it is not 100%. The idea that "perfect is the enemy of good" still applies to modern life, even if you don't understand it.
This is exactly what the AI development community needs because false information is a HUGE problem. A highly delusional user is a low bar but if they can detect simple delusions then it may be possible to expand that to a more general "fact or fiction" engine when interfaced with the "reasoning engine".
The result of the basic ability to tell fact from fiction would be immensely useful because it would result in a feedback loop in which AI would be able to analyze it's own statements and the retrain itself when incorrect information is detected, altering the weights that promoted incorrect output, and potentially eliminating hallucinations entirely. This seems like the goal for anyone developing AI.
I've heard similar arguments in jail. Psychopaths blame the victims for allowing themselves to be exploited.
You see this as victim and perpetrator. I see this as, lesser perpetrator and greater perpetrator. Both parties are to blame. The world is not black and white, it is a sea of gray.
Calling him a 'child' is a bit of a stretch, too, unless you mean 'an immature or irresponsible person' or 'a person who has little or no experience in a particular area' or 'a young human below the age of puberty'.
"Lane said he was a prolific cyber criminal by age 15, and usually directed his cyberattacks toward "big, big" targets."
It implies that he shouldn't be treated as an adult....and the court decided he should be.
No, that's what you have inferred. He's an adult now and will be treated as such.
If a massive amount of critical information and system of your business can be held hostage by a child then you are not "taking security very seriously" and you do not "respect the rights of [your] users".
That fact that stuff like this happens is astoundingly stupid. This foolish child isn't innocent but the businesses are all guilty as a hell.
The ideal voice for radio may be defined as showing no substance, no sex, no owner, and a message of importance for every housewife. -- Harry V. Wade