Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Is it? (Score 2) 50

We already have actors and writers who do what they do perfectly.

Do they? People want actors and writers that will do it for less money and those seem to be in short supply.

We need AI to do stuff we can't do

This is not how technology has traditionally been used.
* Car destroyed the horse market
* The printing press put scribes out of work
* Photocopy machines put typists out of work
* Computers eliminated the card catalog
* Electronic synthesizers are steadily eliminating the use of musical instruments

Why did these all happen? Because they are cheaper solutions to problems that were already solved. So tell me, what makes you think it should be any different for actors and writers?

Don't get me wrong, I think this is an idiotic use of the technology and a total waste or resourced but I also cannot deny the reality that economics is the driving force of technology.

Comment Re:How does AI do predicting lottery numbers? (Score 1) 57

People gamble because they crave novelty/risk, but gambling addicts ignore that the same risk even exists. I suspect AI has many of the same social effects because it easily provides novelty with largely the same kind of at least semi-randomized results and has an acceptable accuracy risk for the occassional users. It also has the same problem for the addicted who ignore that the risk of mistake exists or that the novel claims produced are nested together factoids retrieved based on popularity and repetition rather than accuracy or any physical/logical/proof-based criteria.

Submission + - Newly discovered Linux local privilege escalation bug "CopyFail" (copy.fail)

tylerni7 writes: A recently discovered logic bug dubbed "CopyFail" in Linux dates back to 2017 and allows local privilege escalation across kernels/distros with a single exploit. The POC exploit works out of the box today, but a future version that can escape from containers like Docker is promised soon. Technical details are available at https://xint.io/blog/copy-fail...

Submission + - Copy Fail exploit lets 732 bytes hijack Linux systems and quietly grab root (nerds.xyz)

BrianFagioli writes: A newly disclosed Linux kernel vulnerability called Copy Fail (CVE-2026-31431) allows an unprivileged user to gain root access using a tiny 732-byte script, and it works with unsettling consistency across major distributions. Unlike older exploits that relied on race conditions or fragile timing, this one is a straight-line logic flaw in the kernelâ(TM)s crypto subsystem. It abuses AF_ALG sockets and splice to overwrite a few bytes in the page cache of a target file, such as /usr/bin/su. Because the kernel executes from the page cache, not directly from disk, the attacker can inject code into a setuid binary in memory and immediately escalate privileges.

What makes this especially concerning is how quiet it is. The file on disk remains unchanged, so standard integrity checks see nothing wrong, while the in-memory version has already been tampered with. The same primitive can also cross container boundaries since the page cache is shared, raising the stakes for multi-tenant environments and Kubernetes nodes. The underlying issue traces back to an in-place optimization added years ago, now being rolled back as part of the fix. Until patched kernels are widely deployed, this is one of those bugs that feels less like a theoretical risk and more like a practical, reliable path to full system compromise.

Comment "isn't working" is absolutist thinking. (Score 1) 76

If a virus only infects 50% of people, that doesn't mean "nobody is getting infected". The inability for people to see nuance is annoying. 50% certainly is not 0% and it is not 100%. The idea that "perfect is the enemy of good" still applies to modern life, even if you don't understand it.

Comment Highly useful. (Score 3, Interesting) 48

This is exactly what the AI development community needs because false information is a HUGE problem. A highly delusional user is a low bar but if they can detect simple delusions then it may be possible to expand that to a more general "fact or fiction" engine when interfaced with the "reasoning engine".

The result of the basic ability to tell fact from fiction would be immensely useful because it would result in a feedback loop in which AI would be able to analyze it's own statements and the retrain itself when incorrect information is detected, altering the weights that promoted incorrect output, and potentially eliminating hallucinations entirely. This seems like the goal for anyone developing AI.

Comment Re:Moral of the story: (Score 1) 50

I've heard similar arguments in jail. Psychopaths blame the victims for allowing themselves to be exploited.

You see this as victim and perpetrator. I see this as, lesser perpetrator and greater perpetrator. Both parties are to blame. The world is not black and white, it is a sea of gray.

Calling him a 'child' is a bit of a stretch, too, unless you mean 'an immature or irresponsible person' or 'a person who has little or no experience in a particular area' or 'a young human below the age of puberty'.

"Lane said he was a prolific cyber criminal by age 15, and usually directed his cyberattacks toward "big, big" targets."

It implies that he shouldn't be treated as an adult....and the court decided he should be.

No, that's what you have inferred. He's an adult now and will be treated as such.

Comment Moral of the story: (Score 5, Insightful) 50

If a massive amount of critical information and system of your business can be held hostage by a child then you are not "taking security very seriously" and you do not "respect the rights of [your] users".

That fact that stuff like this happens is astoundingly stupid. This foolish child isn't innocent but the businesses are all guilty as a hell.

Submission + - Two new studies about how many birds die from wind turbines (euronews.com)

ZipNada writes: The energy company Vattenfall and the tech company Spoor have analysed the extent to which wind turbines endanger birds at the offshore wind farm in Aberdeen. Over a period of 19 months — from June 2023 to December 2024 — video recordings of a wind turbine were made with the help of AI-supported analyses. A total of 2,007 bird flight paths near the monitored turbine were examined.

"By combining AI-powered detection and detailed expert analysis, we can replace assumptions with concrete observations and measure actual behaviour in the immediate vicinity of wind turbines," says Ask Helseth, Chief Executive Officer and co-founder of Spoor.

The study found that there was not a single collision

A study by the German Offshore Wind Energy Association (BWO) also shows that migratory birds almost completely avoid wind turbines.

For one and a half years, researchers analysed over four million bird movements with the help of radar and AI-based cameras. The result showed that over 99.8 per cent of migratory birds reliably avoided the wind turbines.

Slashdot Top Deals

The ideal voice for radio may be defined as showing no substance, no sex, no owner, and a message of importance for every housewife. -- Harry V. Wade

Working...