Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:The new closet. (Score 1) 71

They could however have mirrored the data in another location. Talk about putting all your eggs in one basket!

Heads will roll....

Heads will roll? Guess that depends on how many skeletons just burned up in that fire. Data centers are the new closet.

858TB? Might make someone wonder how big the Epstein video surveillance archive is. Or, was.

4 people have already been arrested for professional negligence: https://www.datacenterdynamics...

Comment Re:Cool, but .. (Score 0) 18

The three laureates conducted experiments with electrical circuits that demonstrated quantum mechanical tunneling and quantized energy levels in systems large enough to hold in the hand.

... you can hold a tunnel diode in your hand. And you can even buy them at Radio Shack.

So more science fraud in physics. Great.

Comment Re:The Itsukushima girl is an absolute Karen (Score 1) 95

They had set out to descend after sunset, and I don't remember seeing any lights on the path. Even a paved road can be dangerous in pitch black.

This. I've had to descend a mountain as the sun was going down once (got stuck at the top due to weather for some time, and when it let up enough for a safe descent, it was late). It's absolutely not fun, even when there's still some light. Had it been dark, I think I would've taken my chances staying at the top rather than going down.

That said, anyone not a complete idiot checks things like "time of last cable car" a) in person, b) at the day, c) at the location. Because even there is an official website that is well-maintained (and that's already two big if's) things might change at the location due to weather, workers being ill, no tourists that day or whatever.

Also, checking in person means at least one other person knows that you're up there.

Comment it's a tool like any other tool (Score 1) 39

AI is a tool. And like any tool its introduction creates proponents and enemies.

Some might say I'm a semi-professional writer. As in: I make money with things I write. From that perspective, I see both the AI slop and the benefits. I love that AI gives me an on-demand proof-reader. I don't expect it to be anywhere near a professional in that field. But if I want to quickly check a text I wrote for specific things, AI is great, because unlike me it hasn't been over that sentence 20 times already and still parses it completely.

As for AI writing - for the moment it's still pretty obvious, and it's mostly low-quality (unless some human has added their own editing).

The same way that the car, the computer, e-mail and thousands of other innovations have made some jobs obsolete, some jobs easier, and some jobs completely new, I don't see AI as a threat. And definitely not to my writing. Though good luck Amazon with the flood of AI-written garbage now clogging up your print-on-demand service.

Comment Re: does it, though? (Score 1) 244

The human using the LLM, obviously.

Trivially obviously not. The LLM wasn't trained on texts exclusively written by the human using it, so it won't ever speak like that particular person.

If someone wants to train a specific "Tarrof" LLM - go ahead. I'm simply advocating against poisoning the already volatile generic LLM data with more human bullshit.

Comment Re: does it, though? (Score 1) 244

That is true but also besides the point. Communicating like "a human" is the point here. WHICH human, exactly? We already have problems with hallucinations. If we now train them on huge data sets intentionally designed for the human habit of saying the opposite of what you mean, we're adding another layer of problems. Maybe get the other ones solved first?

Comment Re:Security (Score 1) 80

That was my first thought as well. Perplexity's recent AI browser got completely owned by prompt injection attacks. They are difficult to prevent and can be devastating in something like a browser where most people access everything from email to financial accounts to potentially work systems, etc. Right now the rule of thumb is to not allow AI to press buttons when it's exposed to content outside of your direct control and I don't see that changing anytime soon. So Microsoft's implementation is either going to be gimped in the name of security to the point it's, well, pointless. Or we are going to have some very entertaining stories coming up.

Slashdot Top Deals

FORTUNE'S FUN FACTS TO KNOW AND TELL: A guinea pig is not from Guinea but a rodent from South America.

Working...