Comment Re:What's The Penalty (Score 1) 51
Comment Re:What's The Penalty (Score 1) 51
Comment Re:Another democracy safeguard dismantled (Score 1) 121
Comment training isn't the issue (Score 1) 55
At least for me and many others I spoke to.
Go and use books to train AI.
Just don't fucking destroy them afterwards! Many of these are out of print, impossible to replace! How much of a douchebag do you have to be to destroy them ?
Comment Re:The high cost of training police (Score 1) 100
You are so wrong. The country I live in now has it. It's not called the same, but it amounts to the same. Near impossible to sue the police here.
I'm pretty sure most countries have something similar on the books.
Comment not really (Score 1) 84
I'm fairly sure at least one entire department at MS is tasked with making sure people don't switch to other formats, that despite on-paper "open" XML it remains incompatible and no competitor software can flawlessly read and write it.
So no, unless you can hire a dozen people full-time to counter that, you don't have a chance to break through that.
Comment Re:The high cost of training police (Score 1) 100
Qualified immunity is a reasonable concept that I agree is needed for police work.
It's just being completely overdone, used to cover up clear abuse. The basic idea of "when in doubt, police still needs to be able to act" is sound. The actual practice "unless you can prove to criminal standards and beyond, that the police officer knew at that exact moment, that what they were doing was totally definitely illegal and they intentionally decided to break a law. That's quite a bit too much of "err on the side of caution".
Comment No ??!? (Score 1) 100
What a complete and utter surprise... to the three people who are so high their brain stopped working but miraculously didn't kill them.
For everyone else, this was literally the first thing we thought about, right? Please tell me I'm not the last sane person on planet Earth. Nobody expected that this would NOT be abused in such ways, right?
Comment Re:Really? (Score 1) 53
I doubt that any amount of Excel training would have helped for this specific issue. That mistake could be made by anyone. Once you hide a worksheet it's not obvious it's still attached to your workbook... because it's hidden. It's a mistake waiting to happen.
Maybe someone should make a course and include that so people don't make that mistake.
Comment Re:No it was not (Score 0) 53
Comment Re:Life imitating art? (Score 1) 224
and he answered, "Yes" and that was the end of it.
Which is why you never answer "yes" to anything a prosecutor asks you. It's always a trap. In this case, asking if this is your account and not asking if you sent those messages is the trap.
Comment Re: Hopefully he sues for a few million. (Score 1) 224
Hard disagree.
There are mistakes that can happen - getting a phone number wrong, knocking on the wrong street number, stuff like that, sure.
But all of those mistakes need to be found and fixed DURING the investigation. This is the duty of the police officiers.
Not finding any evidence and STILL going to trial - that's on the prosecution. But I doubt that there would have been a conviction if police had not omitted things or outright lied in court. I doubt any courd would hand down a guilty verdict if all the police involved said that they found no evidence of anything.
Comment Re:Who would have thought (Score 1) 229
The "pattern" is called police doing their work
You can call a piece of coal "off-white, tending towards darkish", or you can call it "black". Both are technically not incorrect. Only one of them is not intentionally misleading.
The whole shit is obviously intended to chill critique. If you are seriously offended by someone calling you an incompetent ass, then politics isn't for you, go get a real job.
And the police really have more important things to do than scaring pensioners who got a bit emotional online. (one of the most famous raids was in 2024 against a 64-year old guy who had called a minister "Schwachkopf" (english: dimwit).
Tell me you think that justifies sending the police to someone's home. Seriously, these people need to get a grip. You can call me dimwit all day and I wouldn't dream of sending the police after you.
But calling them "raids" is completely dishonest
What else would you call it when police arrives at your home at 6 am to search it because you posted something online? (like they would find a reddit posting in your sock drawer, I mean come on, seriously?)
During the ""Aktionstage gegen Hasspostings" (Action Days Against Hate Speech), around a hundred or so such raids are conducted on the same day, and a substantial portion of those is for insulting politicians.
Comment Re:Can anyone from Germany (Score 1) 229
The details are clickbait, and the take questionable, but there is enough truth in it. From my perspective (I'm Germany, but I currently live elsewhere, but still follow German politics closely):
One, there is a considerable crisis in the German manufacturing industry. And the current government has pushed through (with questionable methods) and insane military spending bill while at the same time complaining everywhere else that there is no money and they need to cut this and that and everything else.
Two, there is a strong US influence in european politics, and especially in Germany. A long list of recent and current high-ranking German politicians has direct connections to US think tanks or corporations, and an even larger number found employ with these or US universities, etc. after they were voted out. One would have to be incredibly naive to think that they're hired for their competence or out of charity.