Comment Re:Headlines (Score 1) 154
Then I guess the whole fucking world treats women like shit.
Most of it.
We've made great strides to treat them better, especially in the West.
And yet, there's a long way yet to go.
Then I guess the whole fucking world treats women like shit.
Most of it.
We've made great strides to treat them better, especially in the West.
And yet, there's a long way yet to go.
Giving women equal rights leads to this.
Only if you treat them like shit.
They should have equal rights, but let's not pretend that there wasn't any side affects.
Effects.
Nothing happens in a vacuum.
Treating women like shit makes them not want to pump out babies. Now they have a choice, so they are doing a lot less of it. Literally all it would take to get a large portion (a majority IMO) of them to do it without support from a decent partner would be to gracefully and quietly fund the programs that ensure they will be able to feed and provide medical care for their children even if their circumstances change, but there seems to be a problem even meeting that bar.
That is my entire fucking point: from 4 cars behind you have no way of knowing whether it's necessary or not.
But then your entire fucking point becomes pointless about 8 seconds later, literally before I could read it and roll my eyes about it.
Like any standard, it doesn't have to be fully supported, just "good enough" will do.
Except it doesn't. It's shit all day. It makes people upset all day. This means it's costing productivity all day. See, in the real world with real humans, these user pain points have real impacts on those real people.
HTH, HAND!
Remember... your cell phone wasn't made in America, so despite assurances that it can't spy on you or whatever, who really knows what code or abilities might be baked into the main CPU.
Same for if it is made in America. If it's not FOSS, then it's not trustworthy, and even then it's limited to e.g. devices you can build your own firmware for.
At least a role model to the MAGA types: bigoted lying* anti-LGBTQ+ lout.
* Claims to be a founder of Tesla. Balderdash.
> I hope they mend all of that and become a Great Country, that they were, once again.
Which period are you referring to? They've always had an authoritarian gov't.
I will give China's gov't credit for putting R&D into solar and EV tech. They take a lot of guff for the coal thing, but since they don't have many petroleum fields, they arguably get a pass. They are on track to move away from coal in a few decades.
... "surgery" together, please. Gives me the heebies.
Yes, at least that is at least on paper a solution. As long as you can't just buy your way out of it more cheaply because the legal system works, that is. I can't speak to their efficacy there, only here, where... Well, you know.
Yes, when it's necessary, not just when someone is scared.
If 30 is what seems safe to him, who are you to argue?
If he's not following the law, then... anyone? Everyone?
Highways do have a minimum speed though. 80kph here.
California's highways have a minimum speed, too. It's "drivers cannot drive so slowly that they block or impede the normal flow of traffic". So if he's going 30, and everyone else wants to go faster, he's breaking the law. Also, California state law requires that if you are on a highway and there are five or more people behind you, YOU MUST PULL OVER AT THE FIRST SAFE OPPORTUNITY TO PERMIT THEM TO PASS. This is an extremely underappreciated and underenforced law. I've seen someone pulled over for it just once, they were operating construction equipment and there were dozens to hundreds of people stuck behind them — I could not see the end of the line, so I only know about dozens.
Windows 8 could at least be mostly unshittified and actually came with some substantial improvements over Windows 7, like the desktop duplication API.
Windows 11 offers zero improvements over Windows 10 and makes things a lot worse in a lot of categories. It's way worse than 8.
Doesn't Google Maps Street View achieve the same, but with a more thorough street coverage?
Kinda. They don't have the same accuracy because of the drive-by nature of the activity. They also skip a lot of roads, they can't leave roads or trails, etc.
Pokémon Go pokestop scans were in sort of in random locations
Nope. They were in apparently random locations that Niantic wanted scanned. They fill in the gaps left by scanning programs like gmaps.
Using the Pokemon data is a pretty interesting repurposing of the data.
It's literally not repurposing. They always intended the game to deliver high resolution imagery coupled with positioning information that could be used for non-game purposes.
And if a police officer "beats the shit out of" someone is that a "serious crime" that qualifies? If it is, why should you broadcast it?
You're asking why a video of a police officer beating someone should be posted? Are you new?
You realize this is Poland right?
Uh yeah, we realize this is Poland, right. Are you new?
You realize this is Poland right?
Memory fault - where am I?