Hydrogen does not make a good fuel, tor a tonne of reasons, but nitrogen fuel would be less prone to nasty reactions and fewer problems. Could N6 combustion be controlled at levels suitable for heavy road vehicles or trains?

(Electric trains have their own problems, due to the fact that the junction needs to be poor and the cost of copper is so great that lines need to use far worse conductors to reduce theft.)

The worrying thing is that both cat and nano (and presumably many other editors), by default, do not display the text that is present there...

That could cause merry hell for hiding things in copypasta, configuration scripts, logs, etc.

How the feck does that salmon one do that?

The output is nothing like the source code.

Since we're not taking about infinitesimals, I fail to see the relevance.

Many can be trivially opened using a screwdriver to push the latch back. Some can be slipped with a credit card or laminated ID.

It sounds like your employer is unusually diligent about it.

And they were probably $100,000 a pop.

Now they're commercial and getting much cheaper and more available as the tech becomes mainstream.

Like, pretty much, almost anything in high-end military, Formula 1 or rally driving, etc. etc. etc.

Expensive thing deployed as brand-new tech to get a slight edge in a billion dollar business becomes off-the-shelf cheap junk tech to help granny snoop on grandpa. It's really not unusual.

I like Reddit.

I've literally never even clicked its AI thing in the app or on the website, and I only discovered it was even there a few days ago. My eyes literally gloss over anything that's not the stuff I use regularly (I don't care about stickers, coin, trends, or all the other nonsense either).

Stick to what you know. I don't frequent a barber shop because I hope one day it'll also sell me travel insurnace. I can't see myself using Reddit as a search engine unless it quite literally turns out to be the most amazin search engine in the entire world, better than all the others, and everyone just moves to it like we moved to Google at the beginning. And I very, very much doubt that would happen.

In an office environment, particularly one with a dress code, coveralls are an invisibility cloak that grants access to any wiring closet.

For conference rooms and such, suit, tie, and a laptop grant a weaker but often effective camouflage.

The heliocentric solar system, orbital mechanics...

We knew how to predict sunrise and the phase of the moon before we learned why they happen.

The 100W intern includes the inefficient energy conversion from renewable fuel. The GPU uses 200W after the conversion, so factor in power plant inefficiencies and transmission losses. The GPU may or may not be using renewable fuel.

Perhaps what we really need is to find a way to get human cells to produce chloroplasts so Intern 2.0 can be direct solar powered.

In addition, on the other end of the operation, GPUs add to the growing e-waste problem while interns are biodegradable.

You are correct. That's precisely how MWI is thought to work.

The premise of the argument is that, to conserve superposition information, you would necessarily need to prove that it would be grouped with information QM requires to be conserved, when viewed in a space that permitted it to be conserved. If it isn't, then there's no mechanism to preserve it, so no MWI.

No, because the paradox relies on infinitesimals, which have no cogmate in the material world.

Not strictly correct. You would be correct for all consequences over any statistically significant timeframe, but (a) I've purposefully included things that aren't actually outcomes, and (b) over extremely short timeframes (femtoseconds and attoseconds), differences would emerge very briefly, because different mechanisms take different routes.

Remember, the maths only concerns itself with outcomes, not the path taken, so identical maths will be inevitable for non-identical paths.