Comment Re: Doesn't seem newsworthy... (Score 1) 72
I guess so, looks like it is up to 950 now though, so guess it was a sale...
I guess so, looks like it is up to 950 now though, so guess it was a sale...
It was a yoga 7, but maybe it was a special deal for memorial Day. it is now 950...
There are, or at least were, many applications that were useful and on Windows, but not available on Linux or BSD. Switching off of those can be a significant cost. But if you change the underlying system, those probably won't be available anyway.
I mean I just bought a Lenovo laptop with 16G of ram for $700 with touchscreen, a pen, and OLED screen...
Then they wouldn't be cooperating on marketing with Microsoft.
If you have a NVidia GPU that is no older than five years then it already contains a number of RISC-V microcontrollers doing various tasks, and so will this chip.
It's probably going to be pretty credible, though they are thinking more 'openclaw' and less 'gaming'.
Though I despise everyone playing around with nVidia's "Superchip" terminology.
The core is a LONG way from the surface. Volcanoes aren't. The mantle plumes move slowly.
OTOH, we've known that the magnetic poles were getting ready to switch for decades now. We don't know when or why or how long it will take. This is probably related to that, but we don't have any really good models.
*head bangs in approval*
Oh, forgot to link the dry density for you: here you go. 341kcal/100g. Aka 3,41kcal/g.
Which, like I said, should be obvious, since they're almost entirely carbs (~4kcal/g) and protein (~4kcal/g), and they're, as noted, dry (12-16% moisture). It would be quite the trick indeed to get something that is dry and and is almost entirely comprised of things that are 4kcal/g to be 1,38kcal/g!
Just in case you need help:
Your calculation: 195g (dry weight) × 1.38 kcal/g = 269 calories per pound of cooked beans.
Correction: Because you used 1.38 kcal/g (the cooked density) as if it were the dry density, you essentially diluted the calories twice.
The Actual Math: 195g of dry beans * 3.4 kcal/g (actual dry density) = 663 kcal.
When those 195g of dry beans absorb water to weigh 454g (1 pound), they still contain those same 663 calories (since water has zero calories).
Canned beans are ALREADY COOKED. *facepalm*. You can eat them straight out of the can.
which is waaaay more than I would want to eat at a sitting.
I can't think of a single ingredient - any ingredient - that I would want to eat exclusively as my diet, so this is a really stupid argument.
Unfortunately, when they are separated like that each half becomes nearly useless. They need to be merged, though with clear demarcations so you can skip a part that isn't currently relevant.
I think a giant context is not going to be the answer. It's just got too many problems. Better will probably be parsing the context into connected pieces, and at a different level assembling the "lemmas" into "theorums". (Yeah, those aren't quite the right words, but I'm not sure the right words exist, and that's the analogy from math proofs. Code library isn't the right concept as the "lemma" will often be quite specific to the current task.)
But 1st and 2nd grades???
Sorry, but that sounds like a REALLY bad idea. More than half of what those grades should be about is learning to operate well in groups.
There is hardly a thing in the world that some man can not make a little worse and sell a little cheaper.