Except his complaint is not.
Yes, it literally was. The main public complaint of the weavers was that they spent their entire life learning their art, and then their bosses come in with a machine that they teach to replicate the patterns that they developed, churn out cheap "slop" versions of them, and fire them.
And here we're talking about profits, despite their huge scaleup expenditure. Theirs and OpenAI's margins on serving inference are ~40%.
It's almost impossible for a company undergoing a massive scaleup rate to turn a profit, let alone growing 10X annualized for 3 1/2 years running, but Anthropic pulled it off.
I made someone big mad by suggesting we could discuss topics related to the primary subject as we were already doing in this thread. Rent free!
Tell us you don't know how threaded discussion boards work etc etc
No ne cares about those companies. Unless you are an investor.
They are the subject of discussion, so clearly people do care, and I'm not impressed by any moving of the goalposts or any other logical fallacies.
I don't believe it for a second. They don't have such a feature in place now. They're going to enable trading and then not pull the rug out? That doesn't sound like Microsoft.
Why did they decide they now they need to release a $500 student laptop? It's only because they've been losing business to Chromebooks for a decade.
Even worse than that, it's probably only because they had a bunch of chips that wouldn't bin out as higher spec parts, and they wanted to use them up, so they will probably do a rugpull sooner or later.
And here I was thinking AC required an external compressor and condensor unit.
Thinking is what you were pretending to do. Nobody thinks that the connections don't go to anything. You made that up in order to feel smart, but since literally nobody is as stupid as the person you made up in your head to compare yourself to, in fact that's just pathetic.
"The problem is you don't follow AI companies closely and both Anthropic and OpenAI have announced that their latest models have optimized their own code to run faster and more efficiently, which means that LLMs have already allowed them to make more money"
False. The correct term is lose less money. Zero of these AI companies are in the black.
But compared to Windows? My doctor's telehealth portal doesn't like Linux, so that was out too.
Ouch. That's the rub indeed, people are getting fucked over by their "service" "providers". I'm able to use everything so far from Linux; the local hospital's telehealth and my bank's website will even work in Firefox, but I need to use Chromium (ungoogled is OK) to pay my bills. Otherwise I have to use the phone payment system, which of course is super duper easy actually but I'd still rather do it on the web.
Most schools lost interest in Apple when PCs became usable, around Windows 2000.
The artifact is important because if you examined it you would find it is bullshit. Same rain he won't give his prompt, you could replicate the experiment and produce your own bullshit which proved it was bullshit
This is older than cellular phones, let alone smart ones.
Neither does Google any more. You can put quotes around terms and still get searches which don't contain them
Debian is always behind, they don't have IBM money or a total disregard for the GPL like redhate does
Chemistry professors never die, they just fail to react.
