Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Bitcoin is an example (Score 1) 110

Of how the pre central banking united states currency was. Or any asset backed currency for that matter.
One day a dollar was worth X, the next Y the following day it was worth H. Then those thinking because it was worth X then Y they were going to be rich when it hit Z, suddenly weren't.

This is why people at the time preferred to be paid daily, stashed it anywhere and everywhere. Then didn't even bother to retrieve it on the lows(and why any house or property dating to that time always has a handful of these stashes). This is the reason states and territories had 2008 level monetary crises routinely and the country as a whole every few years.

People think now that this volatility is a good thing. It isn't. it solidifies the social classes, keeping the haves having, and preventing the have not's from saving. Because as long as the value does not equal 0, the haves will still have more than the have not's. And the have not's will stay have not's because saving anything would be dumb, because there's a high chance that tomorrow your wage for the day yesterday could be worth less. So better spend it today when you can get more or you may starve.

Submission + - Sysadmin Creates "ModuleJail" to Automatically Blacklist Unused Kernel Modules

internet-redstar writes: After the recent wave of Linux kernel privilege escalation vulnerabilities like “Copy Fail” and “Dirty Frag”, Belgian Linux sysadmin and Tesla Hacker "Jasper Nuyens" got tired of the idea of manually blacklisting dozens or even hundreds of obscure kernel modules across large fleets of Linux systems in the near future. So he wrote ModuleJail, a GPLv3 shell script that scans a running Linux system and automatically blacklists currently unused kernel modules, reducing kernel attack surface without requiring a reboot. The idea is simple: many modern Linux privilege escalation bugs target obscure or rarely used kernel functionality that is still enabled by default on servers that do not actually need it. ModuleJail works across major distributions including Debian, Ubuntu, RHEL, Fedora, AlmaLinux and Arch Linux, generating 1 modprobe blacklist rules file while preserving commonly used modules. Nuyens argues that the increasing speed of AI-assisted vulnerability discovery will likely turn kernel hardening and attack surface reduction into a much bigger operational priority for sysadmins over the next few weeks and months.

Comment Re:Once again, la Presidenta loses (Score 2) 133

Exports more than it imports because it doesn't classify Canada 'tarsand' that it imports as oil, but the refined products after it as oil. Oil production in the united states peaked in the 70's. Thats why we had the oil shock in the 70's, we ceased to be able to dictate the price.
Safe flow and extraction rates. for long term oil field health. As in to minimize sudden ground shifting as you remove what's keeping it up int he porous rock. Which if done incorrectly can permanently lock of parts of the oil field is why 'armchair' analyzers are always wrong about 'we have enough oil for ourselves'.

Comment Re:no dude (Score 1) 23

Nothing you said disproves that. It's not a hack, just turning the og console into an emulated version of itself, at that point you might as well emulate the entire thing on a modern pc. Because you're no longer using real hardware and any advantages that come with that but all the disadvantages of imperfect emulation.

A hack would be tapping into the internal video data lines/output/traces to input into an hdmi encoder chip for an hdmi port. But no we don't do that now, we just cram a raspberry pi, and emulate the entire video subsystem to get an hdmi output. Or in this specific case. a Hack would be overclocking the actual chip.

Comment Might as well use a software emulator. (Score 2) 23

I am hating the recent trend of sticking a raspberry pi into a retro console to 'emulate' part of it and calling it a hack.

If you're going to do that, might as well emulate it via software on a pc. you can leverage a full modern graphics stack, api's,a nd shaders to enhance the game.

Submission + - r/linux poster unearths Meta's lobbying net behind OS Age Verfication blitz (archive.org)

He Who Has No Name writes: In an incredibly in-depth researched post that was removed by Reddit mods almost as soon as it went up but is preserved at Archive.org, Reddit user Ok_Lingonberry3296 has dug deep into lobbying activity and records across multiple states and at the federal level to unearth what — or who — is behind the nationwide state-level and federal legislation blitz of nearly identical age verification laws targeting operating systems instead of companies — with no carveout for open source, no awareness of how these centralized control models break when applied to a FOSS operating system like Linux, and no apparent regard for the avalanche of second order effects the legislation could cause in contexts like embedded devices, VMs, and data centers.

The culprit that emerges isn't a huge surprise: a recently created lobbying org called the Digital Childhood Alliance, which appears to be functionally a front group for the lobbying efforts of... (drumroll) ...Mark Zuckerberg's Meta, formerly Facebook.

Ok_Lingonberry3296 writes: "...Rep. Kim Carver (R-Bossier City), the sponsor of Louisiana's HB-570, publicly confirmed that a Meta lobbyist brought the legislative language directly to her. The bill as drafted required only app stores (Apple, Google) to verify user ages. It did not require social media platforms to do anything.

...Senator Jay Morris, who expanded the bill to include app developers alongside app stores after Google's senior director of government affairs publicly questioned why "Mark Zuckerberg is so keen on passing these bills." When Morris introduced his amendment, Meta went silent. The conference committee compromise maintained dual responsibility but kept the primary burden on app stores, which is what Meta wanted from the start.

At that same Senate hearing, Morris directly questioned DCA Executive Director Casey Stefanski about who funds her organization. She reportedly deflected, said she "wasn't comfortable answering," then under continued pressure admitted tech companies provide funding but refused to name them."

The research gets into funding, connected groups (on both sides of the political aisle) involved with lobbying, messaging, funding, and other parts of the legislative push, and most of all, tracks the money.

For those that want to dig into the research itself, OK_Lingonberry3296 posted their entire folder of research and sources on github, here: github.com/upper-up/meta-lobbying-and-other-findings

A quick synopsis of where the US laws currently stand:

CA | AB-1043 | Enacted, effective Jan 1, 2027
CO | SB26-051 | Passed Senate, in House committee
LA | HB-570 | Enacted, effective July 1, 2026
UT | SB-142 | Enacted, first in nation
TX | SB-2420 | Enjoined by federal judge
NY | S8102A | Pending
IL | HB-3304, HB-4140, SB-2037 | Pending
Federal | KOSA, ASAA | Pending

Comment Re:No, they don't (Score 1) 34

Yes they do. When markets and Capitalism satisfy lower needs in the famous 'maslow's hierarchy of needs'. Peopl can turn to each other with less suspicion of them being a threat to these needs. It also helps when a society is more homogeneous culturally and racially because it gets past the primal 'us vs. them' tribalism our stone age brain runs on.

Submission + - Should Real-World Examples be Required for Standards and Other Mandates?

theodp writes: If someone wants to impose standards, forms, documentation requirements, and other mandates on others, it seems only fair that they should be able to — and required to — demonstrate it in action first, right? Without real-world examples of what is considered 'good', people are essentially asked to sign off on a black box without a clear idea of what is being demanded, how much work it may entail, and in the end how worthwhile it even may be.

Surprisingly, that's not how things tend to play out in practice in industry, academia, and other organizations. A case in point is the proposed new Computer Science + AI Standards for pre-kindergarten to high school students assembled by a consortium of educators, tech-backed nonprofits, and tech industry advisors that aims to shape how CS+AI is taught in classrooms. A Friday morning LinkedIn post from the Computer Science Teachers Association reminds educators that they have 72 hours to "help us improve them [the standards] by reviewing and completing our feedback form by 9am ET on Monday, January 12."

Under development since 2023, the 247-page standards document is chock full of students-should-be-able-to pronouncements for all grade levels but offers no concrete examples of what that looks like in practice in terms of acceptable student deliverables or teacher lesson plans — e.g., "Students should be able to create a functional, rule-based AI for a Non-Playable Character (NPC) using programming or visual scripting. Students’ implementation must be based on a recognized AI method (e.g., finite-state machine, behavior tree)."

As Ross Perot once said, the devil is in the details. So, in a world where more and more people specialize in governance, risk, and compliance jobs that involve specifying mandates for others to comply with, shouldn't it be a red flag if they can't show real-world examples of how to satisfy those mandates? If you require it, shouldn't you be able to demonstrate it? Otherwise, doesn't it signal that the mandate hasn’t been validated? And open the door to being told “that’s not what I meant” for those left to guess at what was meant?

Comment Re:Due to the ledger issue, it's about to get wors (Score 0) 67

I'll simplify it.
The longer it runs, the more hard drive space the blockchain for bitcoin needs for you to participate.
due to the nature of bitcoin, nothing gets deleted from the blockchain. After all it's a permanent record of all your transactions. ie the basis of nft's and 'decentralized currency'
As the blockchain gets bigger, less and less will be willing to join in for the space required.
With less people, transaction times will go up.
Thus the value will go down, by a LOT.
Those who came in at the start will cash out before this happens, the rest will be holding the worthless bags. ie the definition of a ponzi scheme.

Comment Due to the ledger issue, it's about to get worse. (Score -1, Troll) 67

The entire thing was a ponzi scheme anyway.
I mean a blockchain/ledger that 'never has anything removed' and 'required to be on the network or have a wallet'.
Right now it's in the hundreds of gigs. mostly surpassing low priced 'physical wallets' due to the size and processing requirements.
Soon, sooner than you would like when it gets closer to the 1tb range. With ssd's not having the capacity growth that hdd's had and still have. Along with everyone mostly ditching hdd's People will be forced to drop participation, which in turn will slow transaction clearing time even more. It'll surpass many but the fanatics willingness to participate, many won't want near to over a terabyte of data on their computer dedicated this when it can be used for other things. The gig will be up, the price will plummet faster than an asteroid, and like all ponzi schemes those who came in not long after the start, get holding the bag.

Altering the behavior of bitcoin to sunset/delete block chain entries would do the same as it is the antithesis of the mythology built up around it.

Slashdot Top Deals

Coding is easy; All you do is sit staring at a terminal until the drops of blood form on your forehead.

Working...