Glad your brilliant metrics have proven that C code safer.

Meanwhile, the rest of the world have moved on to actually safer code.

Yes, it is measurable:

In the next x months, how many security issues of what level are found in the old code using tool y vs How many are found in the new code.

People here are showing their ignorance. Disappointing.

LMAO: Law Maintenance And Operations
ROFL: Regional Operations & Field Liaison
GTFO: General Transport & Fugitive Operations

"loads of new security issues and loads of incompatibility with edge case usage."

That is measurable, so it will be easy to see if what you say is true or not, and therefore whether this should be repeated for other code.

I agree

AGI is a myth just as AIs capable of passing the Turing Test was a myth.

AIs are improving and we must prepare for the consequences of AGI now.

Guns kill 40,000 people a year in the US.

LLMs kill about 0.

Actual AGI is a real threat to humanity.
Controlling AIs is going to need a level of reasoning and selflessness the US government has never shown.

Good luck, world.

LLMs are not going to take over the world.
Dirty Sam Altman et al are crying wolf now because their business models are not sustainable, not because they will create actual AGIs.

But it is good that governments are starting to take part in the discussion about (actual) AGI as a threat to humanity.
Because the threat from AGIs is very real, and someday, someone will create one.

...put on the red light. But if you have brain injuries, it might help.

Why do so many scientists think it is okay to find ever more distressing ways to torture animals ?

They do not have a First Amendment and probably won't respond at all. That'd be awfully cringy and uncomfortable akin to explaining to your wife who just came home early from a trip why there are panties on the floor next to the bed that aren't hers. "We uhh, don't like people saying things we don't like. Wait! I mean, I mean, I mean, WE HATE THE TERRORISTS and YOU ARE A TERRORIST."

Translation: LLMs are plateauing and we can't make make what we charge for them anyway so, being Dirty Sam, I will make up any old shit to save my billions.

Go away, do some research and come back when you know what sarcasm is.

Oh and: "You're focusing on the wrong thing, apparently in an attemp to distract us."

Yes, winning a discussion with a woke moron is so important to me, that's exactly what I did.

Our orangey-green genius, smartest genius of all geniuses, has also raised the price of oil and meat, worked to reduce the wasteful shipping of goods from China and elsewhere, and is even now attempting to cut down on the amount of goods transported by land to and from Canada.

Our fragile planet is safe in his tiny hands.

Musk, and even Jobs, were engineers who had an engineer's passion to make nice stuff, and got rich doing that.

Chancers like Holmes and Huby just want money and only jump on a tech trend to try and make it. And in Huby's case, make it by simply asking governments to give it to them.