That depends on whether you're talking about a moral problem or a legal one.

So the answer is actually 'no' to your whole line of rationalization.

I don't disagree... but there's a point at which one says "actually 67% of indictments against a sitting president in the last 100 years have been against one man" and yet you can't ask the listener out loud not to consider the fact that the indictments might actually be justified, they have to have already accepted that the oppression must exist. Also, the bumper might fall off yer cybertruck on a freeway.

As a correlating parallel... The problem with the putinist post-logic philosophy of propaganda is that one must *actively* accept that anything could be true. If one has even the slightest testable element in their belief system or can correlate with one's neighbor (or just a random validating voice on the internet) then the whole methodology can spiral with no recourse... which not only ends in Russia having to explain why a 3 day military operation is now a 3 year war, but also makes visible how hollow their economy has been for decades.

I don't think it directly supports remote streaming

It does, but you'll need to route the incoming traffic through manually. For me, that involves having the router forward traffic on port 443 to the server and configuring a reverse proxy on the server to hand off traffic addressed to jellyfin.$HOME_DOMAIN to the Jellyfin daemon. In my case, Jellyfin is one service among many on a Docker host, with Caddy directing incoming traffic to wherever it needs to go.

It's not automated like Plex, but I've streamed movies and TV shows from across the country without any problems.

> There's no reason why it needs to exist as its own government department.

well that's quite a statement. I guess you'll have to go into denial very quickly now if it turns out that actually tariffs don't fix the economy or something.

That's ok JD. Instead of us giving you access to our research for free, you can instead pay us market rates.

Everyone knows that regulation are burdensome and a net drain on the economy. If people cannot trust their banks, it just means they will live with the consequences of their decisions. Weak men who cannot calculate risk should not have money anyways. I for one look forward to a return of wildcat banks, massive fraud, and increased market panics.

yeah and that means everyone will run them in parallel, or think they can build them themselves for custom purposes. They probably can't, because their idea is fundamentally unworkable magic... but they can still spend the money trying.

There's currently a 1 year lead on H200s, incidentally.

shut up you moron.

you're a moron.

Sure. You've been attending too many MAGA rallies. Or watching Fox, same thing.

That's because you're a moron.

...which grad student explained statistical relationships to Dawkins in the 1970s

I fully expect to see a contract negotiation occur between Michael Bay's lawyers and Amazon's lawyers over how many rising rotating character profile shots there will be, how the physics of reflections work for the purposes of dramatic photography and the minimum allowed size of explosions.

you're a moron.

I'm not saying they're lying but...

They might be leaving out that the 7 years of real time player data was actually collected over 4 realtime years, and this game has an average player count of zero to two... with a release peak of almost 1.5k.

I suspect they don't have the variation in the dataset they're suggesting they do.