Comment Re:First new product? (Score 1) 70
Original Knights Corner (effectively a stepping of Larrabee) was ~60 cores, each 4-way threaded. Top-shelf Knights Landing parts were 72 cores.
Rumor was that the P54C design was re-imported back into Intel -- they had contracted out a re-implementation, I assume because they needed a fully synthesizable design rather than being tied to a specific die process. My old team had an FPGA socket 7 module that could run an instantiation of this code around 100MHz.
Comment Re:Thanks, Bruce (Score 1) 76
Comment Re:Performance per watt (Score 1) 193
- http://ark.intel.com/products/codename/54859/Avoton
- http://ark.intel.com/products/codename/63508/Denverton
Comment Re:Here's the thing (Score 1) 368
Comment Re:"Trusted" (Score 1) 368
Comment Re:Luddite here (Score 1) 109
Comment Re:Become less ideologically bent (Score 1) 231
Comment Re:Simple way to avoid the problem on Macs... (Score 1) 128
Comment Re:Not every chip (Score 1) 128
Comment Re:systemd is a bad joke (Score 1) 494
Comment Re:What about CPU microcode? (Score 1) 179
CPU microcode still exists even if the blobs aren't included. You're just limited to the version that's included with the stepping of your CPU. I believe the management engine (ME) on the chipset is the same way. (On the server side, at least, the chipset won't allow the CPUs to boot without an ME blob.)
Just because your software doesn't include any blobs doesn't mean that there aren't any blobs on the hardware.
Submission + - Intel To Offer Custom Xeons With Embedded FPGAs For The Data Center (hothardware.com)
Comment Re:Why is a microscope online in the first place? (Score 1) 727
Why put a microscope online? How else are you going to do deep packet inspection?
Comment Re:Genetic disadvantage? Hardly (Score 1) 246
The only real reason x86 hasn't competed with ARM so far in very-low-power is that no one has tried hard enough.
I wonder what VIA would say about that. it seemed like they had the atom-level market carved out before the atom appeared.