Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:First new product? (Score 1) 70

Original Knights Corner (effectively a stepping of Larrabee) was ~60 cores, each 4-way threaded. Top-shelf Knights Landing parts were 72 cores.

Rumor was that the P54C design was re-imported back into Intel -- they had contracted out a re-implementation, I assume because they needed a fully synthesizable design rather than being tied to a specific die process. My old team had an FPGA socket 7 module that could run an instantiation of this code around 100MHz.

Comment Re:Become less ideologically bent (Score 1) 231

Agreed. I can bootstrap a complete OS and software stack, even cross-compile it to multiple hardware platforms, but I can't do the same thing at the hardware level. I'm stuck with multiple levels of proprietary hardware and firmware. I can't get HDL to my RasPi. I want the ability to bootstrap a complete hardware design (physical circuit boards, RTL, and ALL platform firmware) between multiple independent hardware and silicon vendors. True multiple-sourcing. If I had the facilities (board manufacturing, fab process) I could do it myself. I expect FPGAs to grow good enough to handle this in my lifetime, but they are still tied to proprietary toolchains, and designs for the FPGA silicon itself is not Free or Open.

Comment Re:What about CPU microcode? (Score 1) 179

CPU microcode still exists even if the blobs aren't included. You're just limited to the version that's included with the stepping of your CPU. I believe the management engine (ME) on the chipset is the same way. (On the server side, at least, the chipset won't allow the CPUs to boot without an ME blob.)

Just because your software doesn't include any blobs doesn't mean that there aren't any blobs on the hardware.

Submission + - Intel To Offer Custom Xeons With Embedded FPGAs For The Data Center (hothardware.com)

MojoKid writes: For years, we've heard rumors that Intel was building custom chips for Google or Facebook, but these deals have always been assumed to work with standard hardware. Intel might offer a different product SKU with non-standard core counts, or a specific TDP target, or a particular amount of cache — but at the end of the day, these were standard Xeon processors. Today, it looks like that's changing for the first time — Intel is going to start embedding custom FPGAs into its own CPU silicon. The new FPGA-equipped Xeons will occupy precisely the same socket and platform as the standard, non-FPGA Xeons. Nothing will change on the customer front (BIOS updates may be required), but the chips should be drop-in compatible. The company has not stated who provided its integrated FPGA design, but Altera is a safe bet. The two companies have worked together on multiple designs and Altera (which builds FPGAs) is using Intel for its manufacturing. This move should allow Intel to market highly specialized performance hardware to customers willing to pay for it. By using FPGAs to accelerate certain specific types of workloads, Intel Xeon customers can reap higher performance for critical functions without translating the majority of their code to OpenCL or bothering to update it for GPGPU.

Slashdot Top Deals

"My sense of purpose is gone! I have no idea who I AM!" "Oh, my God... You've.. You've turned him into a DEMOCRAT!" -- Doonesbury

Working...