Comment DS Division ? (Score 1) 26
Anyone have any clue what a "DS Division" is ?
Comment No Human Staff Left ? (Score 1) 62
Presumably there are hardly any human staff left working at the DoT after Musk's DOGE cuts to staff numbers ? So amending a large number of regulations would be a really onerous task for the humans ...
Comment Er, WTF is WallStreetBets ? (Score 1) 43
Is anyone going to explain (please please) what WallStreetBets is all about ?
I suppose I could just scroll on by, but it's nice when posters add some meaning to their stories.
Comment Re:And this is a good plan because .... (Score 1) 33
Thanks ! ...."Diller?" ... [tap .. tapety-tap] ... Ahaa ! ... a billionaire ...... [continues reading]
Comment And this is a good plan because .... (Score 1) 33
Sorry to be dumb, but who exactly is this takeover by 'Bending Spoons' good for ? Why did anyone agree to it ? Or was it what the capitalists call a "hostile takeover"
Was there some problem with the way Vimeo was running ?
TIA
Comment WTF is "RPO" ? (Score 1) 42
Does anyone here have the remotest idea what "remaining performance obligations" might be ? ... TFS says it's an extraordinary increase in whatever that is which had made the Oracle share price rise and thus made Ellison richer.
Comment Erm .. who ? (Score 0) 97
Who is Rick Beato ?
Comment Re:THE REAL CODE (Score 2) 183
(jeez ... no wonder we can't get back to the Moon)
Comment Re:THE REAL CODE (Score 1) 183
"( a TWO-GREATER-THAN-SIGNS-FOR-BINARY-SHIFT-LEFT 16 ) + b"
[cough]
Comment Wait - Trump did what !? (Score 4, Insightful) 48
He fired the head and deputy head of the NSA ?????
Is he completely insane
So now there is nobody competent directing the US Infosec function. Great.
Comment I Don't Use AI (Score 1) 78
Why would anyone with a functioning brain want to ?
Submission + - Revolutionary Dual Action Antibiotic Makes Bacterial Resistance Nearly Impossibl (scitechdaily.com) 3
schwit1 writes: A newly discovered antibiotic, which targets two different cellular mechanisms, could make it 100 million times harder for bacteria to develop resistance, according to recent research from the University of Illinois Chicago.
For a new paper in Nature Chemical Biology, researchers probed how a class of synthetic drugs called macrolones disrupt bacterial cell function to fight infectious diseases. Their experiments demonstrate that macrolones can work two different ways – either by interfering with protein production or corrupting DNA structure.
Because bacteria would need to implement defenses to both attacks simultaneously, the researchers calculated that drug resistance is nearly impossible.
For a new paper in Nature Chemical Biology, researchers probed how a class of synthetic drugs called macrolones disrupt bacterial cell function to fight infectious diseases. Their experiments demonstrate that macrolones can work two different ways – either by interfering with protein production or corrupting DNA structure.
Because bacteria would need to implement defenses to both attacks simultaneously, the researchers calculated that drug resistance is nearly impossible.
Comment Re:The one I care about (Score 1) 130
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.hamster.ducttape
There was never anything in it, but I checked it every so often, just in case I might finally find out what on earth this particular fetish involved.
Submission + - Why Are There So Many Programming Languages?
theodp writes: Recalling a past Computer History Museum look at the evolution of programming languages, Doug Meil ponders the age-old question of Why Are There So Many Programming Languages? in a new Communications of the ACM blog post.
"It's worth noting and admiring the audacity of PL/I (1964)," Meil writes (and expands upon in Lessons from PL/I: A Most Ambitious Programming Language), "which was aiming to be that 'one good programming language.' The name says it all: Programming Language 1. There should be no need for 2, 3, or 4. Though PL/I's plans of becoming the Highlander of computer programming didn't play out like the designers intended, they were still pulling on a key thread in software: why so many languages? That question was already being asked as far back as the early 1960's."
One of PL/I's biggest fans was Digital Research Inc. (DRI) founder Gary Kildall, who crafted the PL/I-inspired PL/M (Programming Language for Microcomputers) in 1973 for Intel. Ironically, along the lines of how IBM's deal with Microsoft gave rise to a price disparity that was the undoing of Kildall's CP/M OS (bundled with every PC in a 'non-royalty' deal, Windows was priced at $40 while CP/M was offered 'a la carte' at $240), IBM priced PL/I higher than the languages it sought to replace, contributing to PL/I's failure to gain traction. As a comp.lang.pl1 poster explained in 2006, "The truth of the matter is that Gresham's Law: 'Bad money drives out good' or Ruskin's principle: 'The hoi polloi always prefer an inferior, cheap product over a superior, more expensive one' are what govern here."
"It's worth noting and admiring the audacity of PL/I (1964)," Meil writes (and expands upon in Lessons from PL/I: A Most Ambitious Programming Language), "which was aiming to be that 'one good programming language.' The name says it all: Programming Language 1. There should be no need for 2, 3, or 4. Though PL/I's plans of becoming the Highlander of computer programming didn't play out like the designers intended, they were still pulling on a key thread in software: why so many languages? That question was already being asked as far back as the early 1960's."
One of PL/I's biggest fans was Digital Research Inc. (DRI) founder Gary Kildall, who crafted the PL/I-inspired PL/M (Programming Language for Microcomputers) in 1973 for Intel. Ironically, along the lines of how IBM's deal with Microsoft gave rise to a price disparity that was the undoing of Kildall's CP/M OS (bundled with every PC in a 'non-royalty' deal, Windows was priced at $40 while CP/M was offered 'a la carte' at $240), IBM priced PL/I higher than the languages it sought to replace, contributing to PL/I's failure to gain traction. As a comp.lang.pl1 poster explained in 2006, "The truth of the matter is that Gresham's Law: 'Bad money drives out good' or Ruskin's principle: 'The hoi polloi always prefer an inferior, cheap product over a superior, more expensive one' are what govern here."
Submission + - SpaceX to make record-breaking 16th flight with a Falcon 9 booster (spaceflightnow.com)
Amiga Trombone writes: SpaceX will test the limits of its reusable Falcon 9 rocket on Sunday evening when it launches a booster on a record-breaking 16th flight.
The booster, tail number 1058, made its historic debut on May 20, 2020, carrying the first astronauts to ride atop a Falcon 9 aboard the Crew Dragon capsule Endeavour. The first stage is distinctive in the SpaceX fleet as it is the only one to display a red NASA ‘worm’ logo on its fuselage. It went on to fly 14 more times, including the launches of South Korea’s Anasis 2 military communications satellite, a space station cargo delivery run, two Transporter ride-share missions and ten batches of Starlink satellites. With 15 flights already accomplished, it is the joint fleet leader with booster 1060.
Originally, the company hoped to reuse each Falcon 9 first stage 10 times.
“We got to 10 [flights] and the vehicles were still looking really good, so we started the effort to qualify for 15,” Jon Edwards, SpaceX vice president of Falcon launch vehicles and Falcon engineering, told the trade publication Aviation Week & Space Technology in an interview last year.
The booster, tail number 1058, made its historic debut on May 20, 2020, carrying the first astronauts to ride atop a Falcon 9 aboard the Crew Dragon capsule Endeavour. The first stage is distinctive in the SpaceX fleet as it is the only one to display a red NASA ‘worm’ logo on its fuselage. It went on to fly 14 more times, including the launches of South Korea’s Anasis 2 military communications satellite, a space station cargo delivery run, two Transporter ride-share missions and ten batches of Starlink satellites. With 15 flights already accomplished, it is the joint fleet leader with booster 1060.
Originally, the company hoped to reuse each Falcon 9 first stage 10 times.
“We got to 10 [flights] and the vehicles were still looking really good, so we started the effort to qualify for 15,” Jon Edwards, SpaceX vice president of Falcon launch vehicles and Falcon engineering, told the trade publication Aviation Week & Space Technology in an interview last year.
