Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:It *is* social media ... (Score 1) 68

.I am not for censorship,

What is your name for censorship then?

if social media can be addictive, then a serious thought should be put into whether we have to consider it as a drug or not.

And here we go - you just made a case for censorship of social media for everyone. Adults can get addicted, so we must limit what they can see and do.

Yet here you are on Slashdot.

Comment Re:It *is* social media ... (Score 1) 68

It's a bit more than that. The YouTube video feed is also generated based on your preferences and what you watch - just like the feeds on other social media sites designed to keep you scrolling and scrolling and on the site.

Youtube also occasionally pops up asking if you want to try something different. And pops of different videos all the time.

That said, I know what I want. I watch woodworking videos, motorcycle and car videos, some physics channels like Sabine Hossenfelder's, Decline of Empires, radio and electronics channels, some programming channels, and some channels on my research into the Cold War between men and women. So I like their algorithms, even if it isn't aways "right".

Slashdot is a form of social media, Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, TikTok, and some others. To claim Youtube is social media, anything with a comment section is social media.

Comment Re:It *is* social media ... (Score 1) 68

That a person can use the comment section of a YouTube page, sure. But anything that allows replies and comments is social media by that relaxed definition.

No, you've skipped past the part

"You" post videos

The point of YouTube is that all of the content is posted by users, not by an editorial staff. That's what makes it "social media". If YouTube isn't social media, neither are Tik-tok, Instagram, etc.

That is Your definition of social media. A person posting a video about how he fixed his car - how is that social media? People comment, usually thanking him, sometimes offering criticism, a better way, or even tell him he did it wrong. But the guy doesn't flag their comments, he either ignores them to thanks them.

It's perspective. If you are incapable of taking any criticism, or so sensitive that you need to complain of bullying by anyone who doesn't agree with you - well whose fault is that? The problem with that5 is there is nothing that can't be posted that won't offend someone - So the only possible solution is to kill Youtube, and everything else on the Intertoobz so no one feels insulted, bullied, or invalidated.

That's what we call tyranny of the weakest. The ultimate winner is the weakest person the most sensitive, and the most intolerant, believing that anything they want has to be cancelled. Perhaps we need trigger alerts for trigger alerts.

Comment Re:Progressive society... (Score 1) 68

It isn't as though the Regressives aren't also ban-happy shitheads, also in the name of "protecting the children". The erosion of liberty comes from all angles.

Yup, you are correct.

The regressive don't lie about their intentions though, so they are easier to counteract. And if is that important that children are never exposed to a different opinion, or any adversity in their life, and need safe spaces to protect them, well, then we are in stage 3 of the below. Hard times create strong men

Strong Men create good times

Good times create weak men

Weak men create hard times

Rinse and repeat.

My favorite example of the differences between strong and weak comes from a cooking contest show (Chopped)of all places. An eastern European woman had been through two separate wars in her country. She was obviously affected, but also obviously strengthened by her unfortunate experiences.

Next contestant spoke of her parent's divorce, sobbing and bawling about it. A seriously weak person.

Stage 3 just might be here - we don't want to think about stage 4.

Comment Re:Idea vs Implementation (Score 1) 93

People have a fundamental desire to protect their own interests and get ahead of others. It's how humans have survived for millions of years. It's not going away anytime soon. Sure, there are bizarre exceptions like the Dalai Lama and similar individuals, and sure, there are still some small tribal societies that work in a highly cooperative fashion. Pit those tribes against other tribes for the same resources and see what happens.

This. About a million times this. Now despite claims to the contrary, humanity has gotten better at humanity over the ages.

That being said, we still have the characteristics that allowed us to survive, and they are still in play.

We still have a deep seated need to brand other groups as "The other", and then isolate or kill them. Be it color of skin, politics or other differences - many minor, it's all still there. So like it or not, ya gotta deal with it, lest you end up like sheep going to the slaughter. We can be as peaceful and loving as we like, the other guy isn't.

I don't make the rules, I just know what they are.

Comment Re:I'm torn on this issue. (Score 1) 93

While I can feel the the loss of creative control of people in the trade I understand that there's an inherent instability in the entertainment industry, it's just not something people need to live.

People need to eat, drink, sleep, fuck, and shit. If you are in an industry that doesn't meet one of those basic needs then expect some level of job insecurity. Running a bar or restaurant is likely pretty safe because people need to eat, drink, and find people to fuck.

As Garrison Keillor once said, "Why did God create alcohol? So ugly people could have sex."

Comment Re:End of Intellectual Property a Good Thing (Score 1) 93

What is not subjective is the distribution of wealth. That is in dollars and cents. Are the robots and the AI's who control them going to get all of the $$? Are the Oligarchs who own the AI's going to get it all? What is the contribution to society of a consumer? Should there be a paradigm shift in thinking about an average person from them being a lazy consumer to a valuable asset who should be encouraged to express his/her unique gifts? Should we shift to a society that values self improvement over wealth creation?

Don't you know that 99.999 percent of humanity is never going to work again? How are your oligarchs going to get their billions when no one has money because they have no possible employment?

That's sort of sarcastic, but I would like to understand the business model. of incredible wealth without money coming in to buy the stuff mad that makes the oligarch class.

Comment Re:AI isn't for everyone (Score 1) 93

It can't replace anyone yet for anything, because it makes dumb mistakes. And then you need someone who is proficient in the art to correct it.

That isn't particularly difficult. I've made a couple AI voiced videos now, and you feed it the script, listen carefully, then tweak it.

For dubbing I guarantee it will F up an idiom or something like that and cause problems.

Given that this is voice actors complaining about AI Dubbing - do they have to be proficient in every language the video is translated into? That AI dubbing to other languages is a real godsend. Then you need to bounce it off a speaker of that language for translation, and if it is good, you run with it.

Or do they make videos and games in one language only so no one takes money away from the original voice actor - see, it isn't cut and dry as some might think

I mean one of my companies had recent hires who are "vibe coders" .. The code they produced fucked some shit up. And they had no clue, like none whatsoever, of what their programs were doing and how. I mean even REALLY basic shit about the architecture or how it connects to things and how it picks up configuration parameters etc. They had to ask the AI everything. They don't even know it to the level of which files to look in or what to grep for (something you should be able to guess at).

I was like fuck you guys .. paste me all the prompts and shit you used. That turned out to fuckball of dick words, and so we looked at the code and saw that the AI was on a crack cocaine level shroom hallucination binge.

I don't disagree about vibe coding, but it is hella different than an AI voice "reading" a script.

Comment Re:One thing AI is actually good at (Score 1) 93

Did you follow the advancements in the last year? Not only the voice now has emotions, but there are already papers and proof of concept code of synchronizing this with the mimic of an avatar.

I've done a couple vids with AI voice. It's remarkably lifelike. And if the voice generation has a hiccup, there are tweaks that go a long way to take care of them.

Comment Re:Fighting a losing battle. (Score 1) 93

The question is why people think they will be without work. The market changes as it always does, but that doesn't mean there won't be other jobs, possibly some that were even be made possibly by the new techniques. Who is maintaining the knitting machine, who is doing QA of the products, who is programming them to do new patterns? No current AI does things on its own, it's always a human who uses it to create art with it.

There is an equation that must be followed. If AI puts everyone out of work, and no work is forthcoming, then how are they going to purchase what allows for companies to make a profit. If no one is working, of only a very few, the equation breaks.

So yes, new things will come up for people to do to make a living. Just like they always have in the past. If not, most of the human population will be surplus, and the so called fat cats will be impoverished as well - becoming surplus. I've adapted what I do when technology changes. The people who always have problems - and there will be some - have personal inertia issues, believing that they onlywork one job, doing the same thing, their entire life.

Comment Re:Power failure (Score 1) 141

If the cabinet of switches in your neighborhood is down, or your internet is down, your private server in your house is going to also be down, even if you have a backup generator. Everyone in the world who is trying to access your private server, will not.

If you host it in the cloud, by contrast, and the switches or your internet is down, YOU won't be able to access your server, but the rest of the world will still have access.

Hosting isn't a useful solution if you are the only user of your server. In that case, yeah, stick it in a closet in your house. But if anybody else needs or wants to use it, the cloud is way more reliable.

Slashdot Top Deals

Too much of everything is just enough. -- Bob Wier

Working...