Since leaving my mega corp of the past 21 years, I've been working with startups. They uniformly don't give a shit where employees are. Everything is online and people are employed all over the world, where they are.

When you care about the costs, efficiencies and efficacies of engineering, WFH is the best option for design work. The data supports it and small companies are way more sensitive to costs. RTO is the preserve of large companies with lots of case and warped priorities.

>I've always wondered if it's true or not that the mostly Indian workforce in US is paid way below.

I came in on an L1 for a temp assignment. I was paid competitively. I did bring specific skills that were unavailable otherwise.
25 years later I'm still here. VP of engineering in a tech company and doing ok.

I'm not Indian though, although I work with many. Skills tend to count over origin in my field.

The author doesn't know the differences between WiFi, fiber and the internet.

Sunday I was in Austin and saw a Waymo being put on a tow truck at an intersection, and a cop car with flashing lights behind it. I doubt this was a drill, and I had gone through the intersection an hour before, so I guess it actually broke down there. Welcome to the future!

IMHO, Perl's biggest problem was that Larry didn't know how to say "no" to every crazy idea he saw.

My pet misfeature is "long statement that does something UNLESS condition". Yes, let's reverse the flow of cause and effect of the traditional "if" statement, what could possibly go wrong when someone tries to read your code?

Also protip: use HTML <p> to insert paragraph breaks on /.

Socialism with American Characteristics

Iowa's rolling farm fields of coffee

As crap as AI is shaping up to be, it still seems to be not much worse than a call center in India. This adds a second front in that war.

One time back in the '10s I called Apple for something at about 5PM Austin time. It got answered by someone in Ireland. My mind was blown, both because I think Apple had recently opened a call center in Austin, and because that meant it was almost midnight at the call center.

Anyhow, it's about time they figured out a way to "tariff" off-shored non-manufacturing jobs.

If you want tap water to taste better, get a reverse osmosis filter installed under your kitchen sink. That filters out stuff using the water mains pressure, and ejects water into the drain with the crap that was filtered out (meaning it's now got twice as much crap in it). Then it keeps a gallon or so in a low-pressure storage tank for dispensing later. It has no taste, same as distilled water, and is still drinkable even when 35C warm. Try that with regular tap water.

Also it filters out all the biological stuff, so if you put it into an old half-gallon juice bottle, you don't get nasty mildew stuff growing under the lid.

Which ones? Every one is different. I absolutely hate saccharine, but I love aspartame (which has a before taste, not an after taste), and it's been in common use for three decades now. But I don't like the sweeteners used in "zero" drinks as much (which is aspartame plus other stuff). There were cyclamates which were good, but got unfairly banned in the 1970s and still are. Also, "sugar" is uncommon in the US because it has been tarriffed to hell for decades to prop up both the sugar and corn lobbies in favor of HFCS, which is not good for you.

Treating them as all the same is quite unscientific, you have to know which ones are which instead of just turning your brain off and listening to media narratives intended to scare you for ratings. Even simply assuming that you're getting sucrose sugar in non-diet drinks is wrong.

My parents would drink 1980's Diet Pepsi, which used saccharine. It was absolutely completely awful. Too bad I was just a little too late to experience cyclamates, which were unfairly banned, and still are. But I happen to love the taste of aspartame, so that's why I drink diet sodas, especially when the alternative is HFCS. And it's just two amino acids, so not likely to ever be a real problem, aside from the few people who already had trouble with one of those amino acids.

University of Southampton? Meanwhile, I've seen many pics of UK takeaway pizza boxes full of fried everything, something I've never seen in the US.

As for the temps, it's not global warming that's why every summer here is 35C+, it's because much of Texas is at the same latitude as Cairo.

Indeed, I fully agree. The funny thing is, monthly numbers would help us move away from the distortions of the quarterly cycle. If key data reporting becomes frequent enough, you can't get into a cycle of "do adverse-numbers stuff early in the quarter and then cram positive-numbers stuff into the end of the quarter". You have to - *gasp* - just run your business normally.

Some businesses could still manage to switch to a monthly cycle, but anyone who deals significantly in transoceanic feedstocks/parts/goods shipments won't be able to.

BLS numbers aren't some sort of dark art. They're literally just the compiled numbers reported by companies. Numbers are what they are. To fight against jobs numbers is to fight against reality.

People get confused by the existence of revisions. The problem is that not all data gets reported in a timely manner. When late data comes in, it causes revisions to the earlier reported numbers, either up or down.

Firing the head of the BLS because you don't like what numbers US companies reported is just insane Banana Republic-level nonsense.