He also said he'd release the files, lol

Yeah that. He can't even control his orifices. He's a heritage foundation droid that's malfunctioning at best, but that fits their goals

Apparently the 2a folks will only use it to keep down the darkies, not to defend against tyranny... Which as it turns out they are fans of. Who knew? Oh yeah everyone.

Officers aren't supposed to get in front of cars and the person we all know you're alluding to not only didn't try to run over a cop, she was literally told to move on by one cop and then assassinated by another.

Get fucked, Nazi maggot (but I repeat myself)

The Reich wingers gave all that up to own the libs. Now they are openly treasonous.

Yep. Someone pried a Darwin fish off of one of my cars once, I'm just glad the Jesus thief didn't break something

This nation is literally founded on breaking treaties: We broke (again, literally) every single treaty we ever signed with a group of natives, no matter the size.

No one should be even slightly surprised when we break one.

Iran gives warnings before targeting data centers.

The US blows up schools without warning.

"Are we the baddies?"

Yup

China is a major developer of AI, so that's obviously a very stupid take. They would have to bomb themselves first.

Oh look, coward does a libel.

Why do you maggots keep at this when we all know your orange messiah is a child rapist?

What exactly *are* you thinking here? That Microsoft expected and wanted Twitter trolls to turn Tay into a Nazi? That Google wanted a black George Washington? That people just expected LLMs to realize they're being tested on alignment and give different answers when they think they're being quizzed and by who? Do you actually believe what you're writing here?

I was involved in early RLHF (was writing a plugin for AUTOMATIC to let users rate responses to create an aggregate dataset to use for open-source post training). Worked for months on it. Never once occurred to me that it might make models obsequeous. I knew other people who were involved on RLHF. Not a single one ever suggested that it might. It was not obvious in foresight. When you start with "Models behave like X", you expect, in the future, them to behave like "Models behave like X, but just smarter", unless you deliberately try to change the behavior.

You realize that open source and the research community exists as well, correct?

I'll repeat: nobody was expecting this.

There is no grand overarching plan led by a shadowy cabal who has everything plotted out decades in advance with a high level of knowledge as to how everything will play out. Everyone is stumbling through the dark here. Visibility is only vaguely one step ahead.

When Word2Vec was written, the goal was text compression. The crazy properties of latent spaces were an entirely unexpected property.

When Transformers came out, it was intended to be translation software. That's it. But there were little hints at the end of the paper where they tried it on other tasks that suggested, hey, maybe this could be used for a lot more than just translation.

When GPT-2 came out, it was mostly an academic exercise, not really "useful" in most regards. But people, playing with it, started realizing that it could "almost" - not very reliably, low quality, etc - do a lot of different tasks. And it actually kinda could do some useful tasks, like summarization.

When ChatGPT came out, there were some thoughts about using it for simple tasks, but the fact that it could actually write, say, trivial bash scripts or subroutines with reasonable reliability led to a reaction of, whoa, maybe if we improve this, we can really open up a role for programming.

When the first agentic harnesses came out, thoughts of "vibe coding" were pretty far away (the term was only even coined in February 2025!). You'd ask for changes, and then review the diff; they'd do a good job with small projects but struggle more and more as codebase size grew and really needed to be babysit (honestly, it was kind of a hair-pulling experience, even though it did save a lot of time with certain things). But it was visible with each new release that the amount of babysitting you had to do got less and less, and suddenly we could see a path to where anyone can just type in something and a program comes out.

All we can do is forsee one step ahead, through the haze. We've never done anything like this before. There are no great oracles out there who can see the future here. Sorry. Everyone is half blind.

Yes, that's exactly the point: there ISN'T anything.

You're claiming that there IS. So cite the thing that IS.

False. People on both sides ranted about the Epstein files during the Biden administration, now maggots have gotten suspiciously quiet, even the ones who haven't obviously suffered massive brain damage and have to be wheeled around making taxidermy turtle faces.