It doesn't work and they don't have magic to make it work. To the extent it does work, it's mostly automating away jobs which could have been automated away long ago but have been kept around for political reasons.
The problem is that it seems to work in some cases. For example, a few lawyers have been sanctioned for using AI to create briefs. On the surface, the briefs seemed fine but the cases cited did not exist or was not related to the case.
PlayStation exclusives have never been released on PC before, have yet to be released.
There have been a few former PS exclusives in recent years: God of War (2018), God of War Ragnarök, Horizon Zero Dawn, Horizon Forbidden West, Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales to name a few.
On YouTube, AI slop is being created all the time. For example many "historical" WWII channels are pumping out all sorts of misinformation. Videos made within the last two years are highly suspect. Thankfully there seem to be a trend where the titles were all click bait. "German POWs shocked by American. . " "Japanese female POWs surprised by American. . . " The general plot is that Axis military forces were "shocked" by the Americans in some way, but the characters were fictional. For example, I could not find any historical accounts of Japanese female POWs held by Americans because Japan did not have women serving in the military. The vast majority of Japanese women in camps were the US women of Japanese descent held in the internment camps. The vast majority of Japanese women held by the US in Japan would have been in civilian refugee camps not POW camps.
The premise of these stories however was undercut by reality. Towards the end of WWII, the Axis powers were lacking in resources and personnel. The Americans who were winning the war having more resources and functioning logistics chains should not "shock" anyone.
I guess now everyone will be acting like sue it or lose it because penalizing continued wrong-doing now has a time limit from the starting date of the initial wrong-doing.
1) If there was not any statute of limitations, your neighbor from 50 years ago can sue because you never returned his hammer as he claims. Good luck trying to find witnesses and documents from that long ago. 2) The time limit is from when the wrong-doing is found out, not when it happens.
I like how people assume Musk would have won if not for a technicality.
Based on what I have seen in this case, I don't know which side to believe as both sides are untrustworthy.
Kind of weird how stealing an entire non-profit worth billions, maybe hundreds of billions of dollars only has a statue of limitations of 2-3 years.
The principle is if there were not any limitations, people could sue for things that happened long in the past and bog down the courts. The limitations by the way is governed when something can be known not when it happens. In this case, however, Musk knew OpenAI was turning for-profit as it was public knowledge back in 2019. He waited until 2024. If Musk was so damaged by the change he could have sued earlier. It's not like he didn't have the money to sue.
I'm hoping they can upgrade the OS all the way to Windows 2000. Peak UI, peak performance, and peak efficiency.
When someone says "I want a programming language in which I need only say what I wish done," give him a lollipop.
