You go to school to "distil" the teacher's expertise, you distil from the books and websites you read. The actual main problem with distilling from an another AI is model collapse due to recursive slop training. With all human knowledge sources already scraped, they only have got themselves to train on.

You already scraped up the entire human written internet and destroyed multiple fields of STEM research, but now you have 8.3 billion angry humans to deal with now, who still have the capability to disconnect your ethernet cables.

"For an assignment testing students' ability to make evidence-based arguments, they participate in a simulated school board meeting about banning books. It involves debating chatbots designed by Zeleny with names like the Confrontational Parent."

This a VERY thinly veiled parallel to a hotly divided political issue that teachers/unions [and chatbot trained bias] tend be on one side of and the majority of the public, parents, and truth on the opposite of. Given that adults of the highest levels of performance in our society, be it professional achievement, economic achievement, political achievement, IQ, and education disagree on the matter it sounds like what the teacher is likely testing is alignment with her own ideology and not evidence-based arguments.

I saw the same thing in many of my own courses, examples and material used in classes [especially logic classes like critical thinking] that taught and test concepts through distilled 'analogs' to popular political issues with an attempt to appear neutral and present both sides while actually presenting a weakened strawman of one side the argument and consistently that strawman was on the same side. Cleverly these were not the topics for essays where students spent effort on time and research and independent thought but the class examples that most would never look at additional material on... simply walk away believing they formed a valid independent judgement at the pinnacle of their own education.

But then you can pay them $60 to get that removed. Paid deshittification is the new business model.

...yes, people still use textbooks

talking about the priorities of an organization which is mostly symbolic except for the security commission, aka the US doesn't need to care what you think club, is pretty silly

the purpose of the democratic party is to absorb criticism, they're a propaganda wing of the fascist uniparty

except you can't put that in a textbook

I am both disappointed and proud to be the first person on slashdot to take this seriously. Accurate maps are important because the whole point of sticking with the old shitty projections is literally minimizing Africa. Why does this website have so many racists on it?

The rest of the headline should read “Flock cameras replaced with Axion cameras.”
Just changing horses, not actually learning why mass surveillance is a *problem*.

That reply was so stupid I am not even going to point out why. Try again. Read my original post and try to understand what I wrote. Just try to apply basic logic.

Your response was so fallacious you might as well have written 2 plus 2 equals five.

I am embarrassed for you.

Gosh, I wonder why we'd need to make a law against behaving like Homo Economicus in a free-market system. I can't think of anything you could do to a free-market system that might cause that sort of problem.

Would those same insurance companies even cover a wreck that happened if the driver hopped in the back seat? That is what we are talking about, not a driver using autonomous features that they can instantly override at any time.

Remember when Kodak went into cyrpto with their "KodakCoin" in 2018? Pepperidge Farm remembers.

Live distros have been doing this for decades now. It's nice that we have a new option, but Linux has been saving Windows from itself for longer than Windows XP existed.

Just proves that cryptocurrency bros aren't the only ones taking this piss out of the economy. Our broken economics is causing real nazis, and needs to be fixed.