The local effect might be cooling, but overall...
The local effect might be cooling, but overall...
Dunno why you attracted such nasty replies. I'm with you for the most part, but I listen to podcasts as I'm driving my daily commute. I might do that if I took the DC Metro, too, since I tend to get carsick reading while the train goes around curves. The podcast I just finished (the History of Rome) was quite different in audio than it would have been in print; the author (right term?) was asked whether he was going to come out with a book of the episodes, and he pointed out that what works in speech doesn't necessarily work in print--jokes and other turns of phrase don't come across the same, nor do pauses. All in all, I think I preferred listening.
It's sort of a joke. A *very* smart compiler would look at the code, determine that it was trying to calculate the digits of pi, and perform the optimization: substitute the value of pi to the requisite number of digits, calculated (if need be) at compile time. I'm sure I saw that somewhere, but a quick search didn't turn anything up. Just this:
"Never put off until run time what you can do at compile time."
- David Gries, in "Compiler Construction for Digital Computers", circa 1969.
Smart compiler. What does it do to a program that calculates 64 (say) digits of pi?
That's true of a tree, but it's not necessarily true of a Direct Acyclic Graph (DAG). In particular, it's not true of a DAG which is not a tree.
I used it all the time in Prolog, it's really the only way to program in that language.
Oh, yeah, I guess that was nearly two decades ago... Time flies when I'm having fun.
I've adapted to be able to use it, because I have to use it at work. That doesn't mean I don't still complain about it, much less that I'm too dense to comprehend. It does mean that I can imagine something better (menus).
Wow, you really are negative about the Ribbon. Just like me. Only diff is, I don't call them icons, I call them hieroglyphics. (There's a reason alphabetic writing systems took over nearly everywhere except China, and to some extent Japan.)
You mean my Stanley Steamer isn't a horseless carriage? Then there's the steam plant I worked on that drove a 4000 ton destroyer at 35 mph... Ok, I'm getting off-topic.
So all seriousness aside, we use MsOffice 2013 at work. (I think--how can you tell any more? there's no "Help | About"! Ok, had to google it, and yes, 2013.) So I tried this preview you mention: selected some text, and moused-over the hieroglyphs, I mean icons. No preview. There's a little balloon that gives a text description of what it means to underline text ("Underline your text", duh), but the selected text doesn't change for this or most other changes. The only formatting change that seems to offer a preview is the font selection. But I never ever ever ever change the font of a piece of text; I always use Styles. So that does me no good. And mousing over the styles (which, as I say, I do use) again does not preview anything, which would be really useful (or preview changes I make to a style). Instead, mouse-over of a style just gives a balloon listing some (obviously not all) of the settings for the particular style, and there seems to be no way at all to preview changes to a style.
Maybe previewing works in Office 365?
And btw, I don't see why previewing wouldn't work just as well with menus as it does (in 365?) with the ribbon. So unless I'm missing s.t., this doesn't seem to be an advantage to the ribbon, it's just a somewhat useful feature that Microsoft happens to have added after replacing the menu with the ribbon.
"Common functions are easier to find for most users..." I guess I'm not "most users", because I don't find it particularly easy to find the functions I use commonly. On the contrary, I have to overlook a lot of features that are, for me, junk: nearly every formatting feature in the "Home" ribbon tab, for example--like I say, that's what God made Styles for. Every single thing in the Design and Mailings tabs, and almost everything in the Insert tab except "Table"--and then, once you've inserted a Table, you have to use an entirely different tab to do anything with it. Whereas everything having to do with Tables used to be accessible from a single "Table" menu. The Review tab has some useful things, but what on earth the Language stuff is doing in there, I don't know (nor who uses it--I'm a linguist, and I virtually never use it). And what's the difference between the Paragraph thingy in the Home tab and the separate Paragraph thingy in the Page Layout tab? I guess if I studied them, I'd figure it out, but it's not intuitive.
In short, I find most of the tabs/ icons in the ribbon useless, confusing, or hard to find. But I'm sure there must be some user somewhere who finds it all logical. You, I guess.
Like them tailfins on your horseless carriage?
"China got the bomb, but have no fears
They can't wipe us out for at least five years!"
Expert system? How 1980s...
"It's a shame your parents were unaware of birth-control." Yeah, I'm opposed to abortion, but for that AC I might make an exception.
Durn you! I was going to tell that whippersnapper a thing or two about FORTRAN, but you zero-upped me!
On a semi-related topic, I guess
As a linguist, I guess I have to agree with you about skyscrapers. (There's a story about a certain skyscraper and some languages...) And you're right in lots of what you say. But I guess there are other things you can't describe with math, but you can with language. The beauty of a sunset, the uglyness of a burned out car; love, hate; joy, sorrow. We would not be human if we had math but no language.
Math is not the better language, nor is language the better math. I'd say they were orthogonal, but that's not quite true either. But they certainly serve different purposes in different ways.
Possessions increase to fill the space available for their storage. -- Ryan