Comment Those sure were words. (Score 2) 232
I mean, I've zero love lost on the orange idiot, but you're cray-cray.
I mean, I've zero love lost on the orange idiot, but you're cray-cray.
Most people would be fine with 100 Mb: dual condensed HD streams, and relatively low latency. Hell: aside from the ISOs I occasionally download, I'd be fine with 25 Mb.
But.
This doesn't take into account the future. When I upgraded to 2400 baud, I thought I was pretty hot stuff then, too. If we don't keep the bar high, there's no real incentive to increase speed along the fringes -- rural communities, etc. I even know one guy who still uses dialup.
I've really, really been unimpressed with Gemini. I'll use almost anything else.
Also -- completely tangential -- can I just say how nice it is that Slashdot still exists? Of course, it's WAY different than Chips 'n Dips and Redhat IPO days, but still, it's fun to come here and feel 1998 wash over me...
It seemed crazy then.
It's far, far crazier now.
They already do -- they have a duplicate site in Egypt.
Respectfully, the race has been going for a year. But I think it's clear nobody is sure where the finish line is. That being said, I agree that the value proposition is significant, and stupid to ignore. Nobody wants to be Windows 3.1, with no TCP stack.
I've been doing computers a LONG time. And whenever someone asks me which computer they should buy, my answer is always the same: the one that works for you. So, like, sorry if you don't get it, but Ken Thompson -- a freaking *nix demigod -- has found what works for him. Respectfully, who are YOU to question his workflow?
I mean, YES, people still use desktop. But you have three real parties:
* Office workers
* Gamers
* Everyone else
And the "everyone elses" use desktop for exactly one thing: the web browser. This includes grandma, your non-gamer friends, etc. And they really don't care about the desktop experience all that much. They want to use a sensible UI, and use that to launch a browser. And then they Just Don't Care. Because on the other side of that browser is email, news, streaming, social media, cat videos, etc.
LOL! Same here. I remember when he rolled out accounts, and I was almost, I dunno, against the idea. I'm like, "I can read my Chips and Dips^W^W^WSlashdot when I darn well please without logging in." But after a few days, I finally got around to it.
OMG. Almost a Taco-level event with Mark's post...
OMG. Someone with a UID lower than mine who actually posts.
My hat is off to you, sir.
Whenever something "has" to have an alternate explanation, you are no longer looking for facts, but narrative.
Wait, yes, I do! xmplayer and... xine, I think?
But, yes. VLC quickly became the de facto player for Linux, which was HUGE, because as much as I love Linux, it was a PITA to play video reliably before VLC.
30+ years on, and ISCA BBS (telnet://bbs.iscabbs.com) is still going strong with a couple dozen active users, most of whom have been on since the early 90's. And, yeah, we have eXpress messages as part of the Citadel code the BBS runs on, and I gotta say, ain't no pop-ups in BBS land. But lots of good discussion.
$.02,
-Slarty (a/k/a user "Kena" on ISCA)
Hmm... maybe the waaay early 60's; looks like it was down to a low, low $5/byte, presumably to own (vs. rent), fairly early on after ditching vacuum tubes:
https://jcmit.net/memoryprice....
"The number of Unix installations has grown to 10, with more expected." -- The Unix Programmer's Manual, 2nd Edition, June, 1972