I'll guess two possible reasons for this:
1. Force more use of Apple patented and licensed tech for headphones
2. Allow DRM implementation at the headphone jack to further control what can be played on the iPhone
Actually, I think their approach is about right. People tend to follow a reasonably consistent schedule. If you plug your phone in every night and more or less nothing happens until 7:00 next morning, then only change to 80% (which is pretty conservative) or 85% (still avoids the levels that cause most of the damage to the lithium mesh) until about 6:30 and then charge to 100% and does the same based on recorded battery use throughout multiple averaged days, you can have a greater capacity when it is needed, but not have the charge above 90% except for short intervals. This would significantly extend battery life while not significantly reducing the usage time of the phone. Better modeling based on not just daily used, but also looking at day of the week would do even better.
I've been wishing laptops would do this for years. IBM and now Lenovo have been doing a far simpler battery life extension technique for years, but, when I have suggested that it would be good if FreeBSD or Linux do this, I've been unable to get much interest from developers and generally been unable to convince them that this would even be a good thing even when providing pointers to papers on research into l-ion battery behavior showing the significant damage keeping a battery at 100% for long periods does.
I saw a video several years ago that showed a photomicrograph recording showing the physical movement of the lithium grid during charge and discharge at or near "full charge" and how over-charging or even fully charging and holding that charge would slowly break down the grid. I put "full charge" in quotation marks because that number is picked by the manufacturer/designer as a trade-off between capacity and life. Wish I had saved a pointer to this. It was pretty dramatic.
Linux wasn't the first free UNIX (the BSDs) were plus Linux got all the GNU tools.
Actually, it kinda was. BSD was still tied up in the court battle with AT&T at the time. That is the reason I've seen stated that Linus wrote a new kernel.
If my router drops all packets to those IP addresses, it does not matter what is hard-coded or what Widows capabilities are short-cicuited. Almost everyone now has a router and all that I have used allow dropping packets to specified destinations. Cheap ones may not.
The issue of Windows changing this is valid, though. I suspect someone (or several of them) will start serving the list of addresses being used. Someone may well already be doing this.
If you use other Microsoft services, though, those will likely break if you do this.
Guess you missed the article on the benefits of many games to the human brain. It is the cover article in the July Scientific American. Many are very beneficial to cognitive capabilities in adults, especially older adults.
I suspect that "Fahrenhiet 451" would be near the top of that list.
Even that its network connection is independent of the CPU and any filtering is described.
I have been aware of AMT since it was discussed as a way to do an psueudo-console connection on modern systems that lack a serial port in FreeBSD kernel debugging discussions. I suspect that Linux discussions also show how to do this as IT IS NOT SECRET!
I'm not really comfortable about it, but it is very useful, has been designed with security in mind and should be very difficult to suborn, and Intel considers it a feature that is advertised, so IS NOT A SECRET!
The neighborhood associations need to hire someone to drive back and forward on the route at 2.5 mph during peek hours.
At least in California, this will get tickets for obstructing traffic.
The law requires that if you have 5or more cars behind you and yo9u have no cars in front of you that you pull over and allow them to pass. This even applies when you drive the speed limit, but is open and shut at 2.5 MPH. Better check on the laws where you live.
Aside from data saving, I want to be able to listen to local sports broadcasts. Last night I missed the first half of the basketball game that was broadcast locally because the audio stream was unavailable except with a payment to the NBA for the "season" audio package. I could have streamed the telecast, but that would have severely eaten into my 3Gig of shared data for the month.
Of course, I was being cheap, I guess, but paying to listen to a game that would have been free if I had a radio was really annoying and more so as I know my phone had a perfectly good FM receiver that I could not use.
I had access to the tuner on my old HTC Thunderbolt. A pretty crappy phone, but I found the FM tuner quite nice and missed it a lot after switching to a Galaxy S4 a few years ago.
You are attacking the Catholic (universal) church but not making any attempt to deny the facts stated.
You could argue that the total destruction of ALL civilization would have been good and you might be right to argue that. There is no question that the church is almost entirely responsible for preserving European society. It is also responsible for many wrongs, but you might be careful if you assume that the demise of Christianity would have prevented these.The fear of witches and demons was common to all cultures of the time and this predates by centuries the founding of the Christian church. Killing those believed to have "super-natural" powers has gone on throughout early and pre-civilization. Xenophobia was pretty universal and being different invited hatred and often, death.
Do you really believe that in a complete anarchy things would have been better for anyone who was seen as different?
Religion and its attendant discipline kept civilization alive in Western Europe after the fall of Rome. I suspect it would do the same again.
That's the nicest description of the dark ages I've ever seen.
Nice or not, it is accurate. Virtually all knowledge that survived for several centuries did so in the hands of the church. (Or churches after the east-west schism of the 11th century.) Books were regularly hand copied as older copies deteriorated by priests. Almost no records from before the fall of Rome survived outside of those held by the church.
Whatever civilization survived the fall, and it was actually quite a bit, was as a result of the work of the church and its nearly universal European veneration.
The real question, so far unanswered and, at least in this forum, unasked, is why Amazon is doing this. They are not using it to sell Prime. They seem to be keeping rather quiet about it.
My first thought is that it is tied to licensing arrangements. You know... the contracts that say who gets access to what content and when. Some verbiage in some agreement that prevents Amazon from making something available to everyone, but allows it for a restricted percentage of customers. After all, while there are a LOT of Prime accounts, they are a small fraction of all Amazon accounts.
For those not familiar with U.S. Federal budgeting, the President traditionally submits a budget proposal every year. There is no legal requirement to do so, but it has been done since the first President. The budget submitted has no legal significance at all and is sometimes simply ignored by the House of Representatives. The Constitution requires all legislation related to authorization and appropriation must originate with the House. Once approved by the House, it moves to the Senate. They may amend the legislation and, once both houses approve, it is then sent to the President for signature or veto. This is the first and only legal involvement of the President. If vetoed, it may still be approved if 2/3 of both houses agree to do so.
Both sides of this current sad parody of a government of statesmen blame the other for everything including things over which they have no control. Neither side is willing to compromise in any meaningful way and even auto commercials claim that only the weak ever compromise.
I agree with all of the issues with any disclosure of the private key except the first amendment issue. The first amendment protects an individual's right to say what he or she wants (with certain exceptions). It has nothing to say about forced disclosure of information. That comes under the fourth and fifth amendments. In this case it would not seem that the fifth is really applicable as there seems no way that this could incriminate Apple or any Apple employee, so it's the fourth that needs to be considered, There is a LOT of case law and IANAL, so I won't speak to it.
More significantly is the perception of the capabilities of the FBI's computer experts. I can assure you that they have talented people more that capable of finding the code that counts login failures and NOT calling the routine to reset the phone. They could probably build an iOS version that completely skipped the need to login, at least on a 5C which I believe lacks some of the hardware that enforces security policy in 6 and later phones.
In the end, the signing key is really the ultimate issue. It is literally the key to the kingdom and to all of the data on every iPhone and iPad.
The best way to avoid responsibility is to say, "I've got responsibilities."