Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system


Forgot your password?
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Re:Economics? (Score 2) 312

Most of the older plants have had their license extended to 60 years. Some are requesting an extension to 80 years because everything is working just fine.

That's not safe, though, because you can't perform a complete metallurgical inspection of the interior of the reactor, and it tends to be damaged over time. Also, many of our older reactors are based on unsafe designs; that they haven't had an incident is laudable, but that they won't have a serious one in the future is still not assurable. And a number of them are proven insecure designs, literally based on the same design as used at Fukushima Daiichi and also storing spent fuel on site.

I am not wholly against nuclear power, but I am wholly against extending the lifespan of old reactors which frankly weren't safe when they were built. That human ingenuity has kept them going is not a counterargument. It is pucker-inducing.

Comment Re: Budget and Timelines (Score 1) 312

Fukushima would have actually been fairly safe if the all the safety features would have been implemented instead of being scaled down because of cost....

I don't think you can call a reactor design safe if it depends on external maintenance. Only a reactor which is self-scrambling in a runaway can possibly be called "safe". Then, perhaps even quite reasonably so, until we have to talk about decommissioning. I still think we should just shove the whole reactor into a subduction zone ;)

Comment Re:Good! (Score 0) 312

when coal (especially) is the main alternative for providing the huge baseload requirements of a solid electrical infrastructure, it's a no-brainer to have nuclear be a portion of the multi-legged stool we need.

Having no brain is suggesting that this overly industrialized and extractive society is worth preserving in its current form. Waste for the sake of production, indeed production for the sake of production, cannot continue endlessly unless we achieve zero emissions and 100% recycling.

Comment can't have a golden age "soon" (Score 1) 87

We've got to bootstrap our way into space before we can have a golden age thereof. We can't feasibly have a golden age of space until we're building spacecraft in space out of stuff we mined in space.

We're going to have to have a boring age of mining before we can have a golden age of exploration.

Comment Re:Is that all (Score 1) 502

Having a bad gene is not someone's fault, the best that you can say is 'bad luck'. If it is severe and you know that you have it, then maybe you should think hard before you have children.

Yes, you almost have it concisely there: Having a bad gene is bad luck, and choosing to breed if you have it is someone's fault.

Some people with genetic problems do do that, or have the foetus tested and aborted if it has the problem.

I just don't think I've got great genes or a great situation for being a good parent, so even though I think I'd be better than the average dillhole I still don't think that raises the bar sufficiently to call myself a good parent. Thus, I'm not having any. I've had multiple opportunities, and my last girlfriend even left me for someone else over it. It was sad, but that's preferable to having her skipping pills trying to catch my child, so I'm not really complaining. Now, how can I make a statement similar to "I'm putting my money where my mouth is" without making it sound like I'm sucking my own dick? If I could do that, I've have been all over pornhub already.

Comment Re: Go to hell Elon (Score 1) 256

The more I hear about these Tesla cars the worse they sound. "We decide when, where, and how you use car and Autopilot, because the EULA says we can do whatever we want."

Yes. It's a serious problem. Literally all of the self-driving cars are going to have to phone home in order to operate. It's standalone GPS vs. your phone all over again.

Comment Re:Because Windows Sucks (Score 1) 258

Don't worry, they've already warned us, updates are going to be all or nothing affairs.

Yeah they're there already now, it's just update rollups and the MSRT. So now I'm no longer installing updates. This is a slight hassle. At some point soon I'll remove everything not gaming-related from this PC, and go back to doing it all on my Linux system... which is right here, connected and ready to use. I just dislike switching (I don't have a KVM, just the functionality in my monitor) so I've been avoiding it. I also seem to need to put quieter fans in my Linux machine because it's way, way louder than my Win7 one.

Microsoft has really shot themselves in both feet with this spyware shit.

Comment Re: Go to hell Elon (Score 1) 256

accidents per vehicle mile traveled is an extremely misleading statistic, because for MuskWagons it only includes almost brand-new, high-end vehicles owned exclusively by rich people who can afford to have them religiously maintained

Right now you have to have your car maintained by Tesla in order to keep your warranty. Will Tesla even let you use Autopilot if you don't do that? I doubt it.

Comment Re:Incidents vs. population? (Score 1) 256

Does anyone have a "Accidents per 100.000 vehicles" statistics out there?

Those are easy to find. They are not relevant! Autopilot is only used on highways and freeways, so you have to compare accidents (and fatalities) only on highways and those statistics are much more difficult to come up with. Otherwise you'd already have seen an apples-to-apples comparison.

Comment Re: waah waah i oversold my product (Score 1) 256

If he'd called it Driverassist or similar, idiots would be less likely to assume they can watch TV or send texts while driving.

Pls stop trolling. (You can't call it "driverassist" because it is part of a class of features known as "driver assists".) Nature always makes a better idiot, it doesn't matter what they call it, there will always be an idiot out there to get it wrong.

Comment Re:He's totally right (Score 1) 256

Even a PRIMITIVE system that's only capable of "stay in the current lane, follow the car in front of you if the lane becomes ambiguous, and maintain speed while braking if necessary to avoid a rear-end collision" on limited-access roads would be a net improvement over what we have today.

No, no it wouldn't, because you can already buy a car that has that. Pretty much every manufacturer sells at least one model with radar-adaptive cruise control, and today all of these systems will run right down to 0 mph and apply the brake for you.

Comment Re:I wonder... (Score 1) 195

Kodi could definitely use improvement also. Searching leaves much to be desired, especially if you're looking for live events.

I'd be happy if they just made headless an official feature and not "go read the source and comb through 234087238723 forum posts if you're interested". Because right now I have two independent sets of metadata describing my media library, and it's dumb.

Slashdot Top Deals

"If you can, help others. If you can't, at least don't hurt others." -- the Dalai Lama