Which makes them an almost perfect simulation of human intelligence.
Humans aren't infallible, but even pretty stupid people clearly do things when they think that "AI" currently can't. There is at minimum some kind of filtering and going back to the well happening that the LLMs can't manage. I am not ruling out them becoming capable of it in the future, but they are clearly not there now.
Which 2 statement are contradictory? Can you quote them?
That was literally my first reply to you in this thread. Can you read them?
The computer on Star Trek is not intelligent, it's intelligence is simulated.
LLMs aren't even that smart. Their intelligence is imagined.
So contradicting yourself further is supposed to make it better?
What happened to the deficit under Clinton, who signed a welfare reform bill that made substantive changes?
That would be nice, but even if it happened games would still require patches because the systems they run on change. This is true even of consoles ever since Xbox.
15. Political Scientists
16. News Analysts, Reporters, Journalists
Um, no. To be good at any of these things, you need to have lived in this world as a human and have real human concerns.
That's exactly why they are going to be replaced by AI, to prevent anyone from doing the job with real human concerns.
Why do you want there to be millions of people exempt from minimum wage and workplace safety laws?
When did you stop beating your wife?
Plus most of the time there are so many bugs, patches, blah blah blah that need to come out first, why pay $60, $70+ when I can get the fixed/complete game later for 50% or more off?
Lots of games have bugs that literally never get fixed. Snowrunner has had an autosave stutter bug since day one which is still there. There is actually an open source patcher to fix the problem, and has been ages, and they STILL haven't fixed it, even though they could just copy the fix.
What I find compelling is waiting for all the DLCs to get released, because not long after that's done there is usually an all-in version which costs little more than the original base price. Although I broke this rule for myself and bought Snowrunner anyway, and the year 1 and 2 passes. In my defense, they were all on sale.
You actually have a greater need for efficiency under socialism because there are fewer people willing to put in the long hours at work.
[...]
Also the argument that we should be empathetic about them losing their jobs makes zero sense under socialism. The state will simply assign them new jobs.
People won't work long hours under socialism, but people will work whatever jobs they are assigned under socialism? You're going to have to pick one if you don't want people to know that you aren't actually thinking.
Oh, so if they are only your fellow citizens instead of people you see every day, they don't matter?
That makes less than no sense. This is not unusual for you but I still have to wonder where you get your drugs, and how I make sure to avoid that source as what you're getting is clearly tainted.
I could see it actually working there because you can simulate the process before actually running the code. On the other hand, the simulation is only as good as the input. If the stock isn't correctly modeled then the simulation will be incorrect.
We already know you don't care about rights. No need to belabor the point.
Ah yes, my fruit picking neighbors
To think the price of a phone is proportional to its speed is wack.
You're confusing statements about value with statements about price. If you want your device to perform in the market, you have to offer both things. Apple has cachet for some reason, this doesn't.
Your fault -- core dumped
