Blame the georgians - they discovered the coal that kicked off the industrial revolution! Or what about the victorians who turbocharged it and brought electricity to the masses requiring coal power to generate it??
It's not reasonable to blame anyone before we knew about the greenhouse effect in the late 1800s. It's perfectly reasonable to blame people after that who voted for this.
It's also not a problem any individual can fix.
But an individual can contribute in fixing.
They can literally only make a significant difference by getting lots of other people to change their behavior. Nothing else any one average individual can possibly do will have any measurable effect.
The measures taken did - nothing
The measures taken were fuck all.
Perhaps it is time to exercise our collective masses of grey matter (and our AIs) to figure out some feasible coping measures and implement them.
When that happens I'll believe Global Warming is something other than a Global Barming
When people act smart you'll believe in a thing? Fuck that's stupid.
Can't wait to see the comments on this one!
H-1B abuse is Huge in the tech sector and traditionally lamented here. But on the other hand, Trump is the one doing the fixing.
Should be interesting to see how those displaced by H1B workers in the past try to justify more cheap H1B workers
Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha.... You think Trump is fixing this?
Nope, as per usual this will be ignored if you make a generous tithe... erm... donation... erm... gratuity in advance to the Trumpublican party.
It's a law that won't ever be enforced... unless you're a company the tangerine thundercunt doesn't like.
The end game is not to protect US workers, but strip what few rights they have down so that they're as cheap as the Indian workers.
If you could call it thinking, maybe.
More likely this is posing and nothing else.
If it is something else, it's a threat, solicitation for bribes, or both
Beat feet, give food
They can't do that until they finish destroying the ACA
Given the price increases on the former and the price drops on the latter, soon it might be feasible
You ignored vulture capitalists buying the starter homes and the Airbnb epidemic
There are people starving on the streets NOW
They were not in any way the same company
This is, of course, capitalism-worshiping nonsense. Corporations are legal fictions. Having bought one, you have become the owner of the entire fiction, including the name. They are SCO now in every sense that matters, and I say that as someone who used to run SCO software and who knows several former SCO employees. That SCO is dead, hopefully this SCO can also die soon, but they are legally the same SCO.
today Microsoft is one of the world's largest users of Linux. It has no current motivation to harm Linux and every reason to defend it.
False. As a hosting provider Microsoft doesn't care what OS people are using, they just have to host it. But as an OS provider, Linux is still competition, so they still have a reason to attack it.
It's a crap argument anyway because the point was to keep Linux from becoming relevant on the desktop.
There's also just the general fact that they don't softball shit. If something is anti-consumer they say so. It just so happens that everything Nvidia does these days is anti-consumer. Remember when they were the underdog? Those were good days because they were trying hard.
* UNIX is a Trademark of Bell Laboratories.
