Comment Re: Good (Score 1) 31
You are hereby forbidden from learning anything from this comment!
But you weren't going to anyway, were you.
You are hereby forbidden from learning anything from this comment!
But you weren't going to anyway, were you.
So our families deserve the risk, but families of the people who create and market carcinogens don't?
Forgive me if I consider people who benefit from poisoning my children to be less than innocent.
ROFL!!! I hadn't seen that. Thank you from the bottom of my heart!
China has several thousand robotaxis in service right now, the US is well behind the curve already.
Of course pre-pandemic, it was around $1200/ounce, and it's been just insane since the pandemic set in until now...
True, still not at the peak, but speaking of adjusting for inflation...
Cisco from 1998 to 2001 had a crazy anomalous valuation that was the biggest of the big examples of the dot-com bubble run amok. That behemoth of a company had an inflation-adjusted market cap of about a trillion dollars. Microsoft was in same ballpark, with Oracle and Intel a bit less, but still big examples of the dotcom bubble.
This time around, Google is 3.8 trillion, Meta is $1.6 trillion, Microsoft is $3.6 trillion, Amazon is $2.5 trillion, nVidia is $4.4 trililon, Apple is $4.1 Trillion....
This bubble is just massively bigger than the dotcom bubble, with just one of the big players this time being valued even adjusting for inflation more than all the big players of the dotcom era put together, and there being a fair number more of them this time. It dwarfs the 2007 bubble in these top few players alone. When this pops, it's going to be mind numbingly severe fall..
How many of those young men feel like a college degree is the way to a better life?
Few. Especially the white ones. They know they've been iced out of their futures. They see the clown-world around them: prosperity is for non-whites and corrupt while females. Not them.
Yeah, this is one area where LLM can certainly make one side more successful. A screw up means either the attack fails, which no worse than not trying or messing up the target system, which may not be the ideal outcome, but it's not like the attacker really cared that much about the target system...
You think the companies are deliberately keeping their models from being professional grade because of some sense of social responsibility?
That is hilarious. They are pushing as hard as they can and hyping it up even more than it is capable of performing. Any shortcomings on their part is not by lack of trying or somehow holding back.
Such a shame that CVE quality is generally crap, as it's flooded with dubious 'findings' from people trying to build a resume as a security researcher. I'm not sure why you assert this is largely still done manually, reconciling with SBOM tools in my neck of the woods is pretty much automated for detecting and flagging issues because *no one* has time to deal with the gigantic volume of CVEs. Of course another problem in those SBOM tools is they have a terrible false positive rate. Trying to follow their guidance 100% may be impossible (complete misidentification) or requires significant work (SBOM tools don't do great with 'backported' fixes, and many software components don't bother with maintaining backward compatibility, so rebasing to a new version is big).
Updating software that is vulnerable is a key component, but I wager a greater general risk is how folks configure and operate credibly secure software stacks in insecure ways.
Random guy? It's probably the guy who founded the fertility clinic. Or the technician in charge of taking the samples out of storage.
There's no honor among eugenics fans. "Good genes' always means "my genes", otherwise you were sleeping in biology class... There's a whole Wikipedia list page for doctors who pulled this little trick. And that's just the ones who got caught.
You are a fucking idiot. The US military fought against fascism. Antifa is short for anti fascism. Fascism is anti American, and any true American is anti fascist.
Whilst I agree with the first, second and third sentences wholeheartedly, fascism is as American as selling glass beads to natives and stealing their land.
Up until the Pearl Harbour there was a sizable fascist movement in the US, organisations like the German-American Bund had tens of thousands of members right up until December of 1941 when the US declared war on Nazi Germany and pretty much banned them. Not that we were entirely innocent over this side of the pond with the BUF (British Union of Fascists) but we did see the writing on the wall sooner rather than later with membership falling off a cliff in the late 30s (notably with the BUF becoming openly racist, which is poisonous to the British character, so there was no need for an outright ban until after the war). I'm hoping that Europe can follow that example again before one of our nations falls into Fascism.
Make no mistake, there will be a significant number of Americans openly supporting Fascism, in particularly they will be vocal in saying things like "don't call it fascism" and calling people they don't like "left".
This is the most American thing I have seen this year.
Sadly it's infecting the rest of the world.
A lot of things that you get quoted will change price depending on location, time, browser/OS (user agent), IP, et al. I'm thinking specifically of flights, accommodation, insurance, and other things without a strictly advertised price which would mean they become subject to advertising laws and consumer rights.
And yet it's the Democratic leadership in the Congress forcing the issue on releasing all the documented evidence about the Epstein mess,
Cute, you act like Democrats were somehow prevented from releasing the Epstein documents under Biden, and insist that Trump isn't prevented from releasing them like Biden (apparently) was...
Why didn't Biden release the documents in 2021? 2022? 2023? Or 2024?
Because SCOTUS had sealed the files and blocked the release until just a few weeks ago.
So yes, they really were prevented from releasing the Epstein files.
Translation: No-one can compete with the Twitter (now X) market-share because of legacy users but we plan to cheat by re-using their former name, logo and trademark.
As always, the big question is: What can BlueBird offer that is different to Mastodon and BlueSky? What's their market USP? They have to obey the same censorship laws and (eventually) age-restriction laws. They'll be manipulated by the same bots and disinformation networks as Twitter, unless their subscriber's down-vote the propaganda. The only advantage, is a 'guaranteed' user base (via brand recognition) allows them to monetize their product quickly. Since X (formerly Twitter) has market share, they're depending on those legacy users to change to BlueBird for no real benefit.
For me, mentions of TheAppFormerlyKnownAsTwitter have pretty much disappeared. News sites no longer quote tweets, friends no longer mention them. The only time I hear about them is when they get another fine for breaking the law or Musk does something else incredibly stupid.
Social Media itself is dying, but TheAppFormerlyKnownAsTwitter is exemplifying why. Social media has now become beholden to rich people who are using it to try and drown out voices they don't like. Hence people are switching off. It's for that reason that new social media networks don't really have a chance. The things we used to use Social Media for, aren't really being served by social media (mainly it was used to communicate with friends, families or like-minded people, now it's being used to push someone elses agenda)
New York... when civilization falls apart, remember, we were way ahead of you. - David Letterman