Comment Re:Getting tired of Cold War 2.0 already (Score 1) 48
what would it be a dictatorship
A few too many bong hits? Bet it took ten minutes to write that.
Comment Re:Idiocracy (Score 1) 131
ou are agreeing with whoever goes on to win.
Or you're disagreeing with with any of the candidates who could possibly win. The presidential candidates of both major parties not only approved of a genocide, but both were committed to use our tax dollars to fund and arm it. I couldn't vote for either one.
Comment Re: Seems reasonable (Score 1) 60
Worked there for nine years, sometimes with people who had two- or three-digit employee IDs. In all their time at the company it had never sold customer data. YMMV
Comment Re:isn't it obvious? (Score 3, Insightful) 33
Comment Re: No, it isn't obvious (Score 3, Insightful) 33
Exactly. They are projecting their own failures onto others.
It's ok when American LLMs encourage kids to kill themselves, that's just business and what can you expect from dumb machine systems, but if foreign operators use American LLMs to exploit security weaknesses in American businesses, then suddenly it's evil rogue AIs and spies.
Nothing to do with our restrained efforts m'am, please sign the dotted line for a donation, we need your help to defend *you*.
Comment Re:"Excluding" from a music chart (Score 1) 27
If they are "excluding" certain items from it, then they aren't doing their job.
I feel they should allow sandwiches in the charts because, if they are "excluding" ham and cheese on toast from the charts they aren't doing their job.
Comment Re:Single dumbest way? (Score 4, Informative) 131
The logic is economic autarky -- the belief that we're always better off having complete political sovereignty over every part of our supply chains than having to depend on imports for anything.
This is likely also behind Trump's trade war with Canada. His demands with Canada aren't about discirimatory tariffs -- those were negotiated away with NAFTA then re-negotiated in his first term. His demands are now infringe on Canadian sovereignty, to give US control of Canada's external trade policy, and even on its internal markets (e.g., the use of French in Canadian internal commerce). Symbolically, that's why he wants to rename Lake Ontario to "Lake America". HIs establishment of US control over the Venezuelan oil industry is his greatest foreign policy achievement -- although it's not clear he understands the legal limits on what he can do with their money.
There's a foreign and military policy angle to this too: Taiwan is absolutely critical to the US economy, so we are absolutely committed to defend them if China invades. Semiconductor autarky would mean it's not our problem.
The problem with autarky is that even if it's a good idea (which economists don't believe), you can't conjure it into existence overnight. It will take many years, possibly decades for the US to replace the Taiwan's semiconductor industry. In effect, the administration is proposing to inflict the very damage on the US economy that a Chinese invasion of Taiwan would inflict.
And, once the US has voluntarily self-inflicted that damage, China would be free to invade Taiwan.
Comment Re:Crappy IT security has consequences (Score 1) 75
What's this Ohio thing you're referring to?
FirstEnergy stole >$500 million by applying a surcharge to rate payers for smart meters, dumped the money into a general fund and spent it on other stuff, including some bribes of Ohio politicians, and colluded with the PUC to alter audit records to cover it all up. The former Ohio house speaker is in prison over it right now. Another politician died before trial; supposedly a suicide...
And no, we're not talking about different hardware. The same rampant corruption is endemic throughout the entire industry for all such procurement. The contractors, utilities, PUCs and politicians are all feeding at this trough.
Comment Re:Seems reasonable (Score 1) 60
Ship From Vendor - they'll give the vendor your delivery name and address, kind of necessary
Payment Processing - they'll give the payment processor your name and credit card number, again kind of necessary
Alexa and Ring Emergency Response - They'll give the police your name, address and emergency type, rather necessary as well
Etc.
They don't sell your data. Ever.
Comment A durable lexical shift? Indubitably. (Score 1) 113
Comment Re:Seems reasonable (Score 1) 60
The difference here is that Amazon never sells customer data. Ever.
Comment Re:Translation: They want more money for the data (Score 4, Interesting) 60
I worked at Amazon for 9 years, and security of customers' data is the top priority. I could literally access Jeff Bezo's personnel file with lower permissions than I could access your purchase history or your Ring or Alexa data. We had to complete a refresher course on data protection every year.
Comment Re:Crappy IT security has consequences (Score 1) 75
I can tell you that's wrong.
You can provide an anecdote of your personal experience in one case. I, however, can tell you about the half billion dollar scam of FirstEnergy (Ohio), or what's gone on in Oregon, California, Michigan and others. The cases PUC scams around "smart grid" equipment are legion. Some of them are exposed. Many are entirely suppressed when the more competent criminals ensure the auditors are (willingly) prevented from noticing.
Comment Re:Laying the groundwork (Score 5, Interesting) 127
For some definition of 'they', sure, there's always *someone* paranoid about the scenario.
However there's a fair amount more credible supposition over this one. Trump's sore loser reaction has paved the way for some dangerous moves.
In 2020, he only went to interfere *after* the fact, but he clearly interfered. When the results betrayed him, he sought to overturn them and when that failed he tried to ignore the electors and use their own anyway and as that failed he tried to get Pence to reject the election and as that failed he incited a mom to try to disrupt the proceedings. He learned that in a fair game he actually could lose and that was unacceptable and he was willing to do whatever it takes to replace a loss with a win.
Now he and opportunistic cohorts are already much more proactive about it. Every reason to anticipate any plausible excuse to rig or discard the elections as he has proven himself already willing to do so and is surrounded by a much more all-in administration than his first term. Already trying to mess with mail-in, already openly rigged the representative maps, already been working ICE and national guard troops to get the hang of domestic military operations. Stephen Miller once basically publicly fantasized about sending republican controlled national guard into democratic states against their will to make them bend to his will.
I do anticipate the election will be *held* and if and only if the results are a loss will they try anything like an 'emergency', but I absolutely expect ICE and national guards to be doing operations around strategic polling sites. Ostensibly about immigration or crime, but with the oh so coincidental side effect of voter suppression.