Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system


Forgot your password?
Get HideMyAss! VPN, PC Mag's Top 10 VPNs of 2016 for 55% off for a Limited Time ×

Comment Re:Does this surprise anyone? (Score 1) 1004

No, the Time article is perfectly clear. What is not clear is where you get your twisted ideas from. You haven't been able to support them yet.

You're deliberately being obtuse

I suggest you look up the meaning of obtuse. It is not synonymous with questioning, nor is it synonymous with challenging someone's partisan beliefs.


I have been asking you questions. You have been failing - repeatedly - to answer them in a factual manner.

I've produced 3 links and at least 2 quotes.

And I have shown how they do not actually support your statements. If these are your only sources, then you are at best spouting nonsense that you cannot support and at worst simply lying.

December 2014: Clinton turns over ~30k "work related" emails that she filtered herself (no third party) and deletes the other ~30k which she has deemed "personal"

You've gone back to your huge assumption, there. In fact, you have multiple huge assumptions in that one statement that you have shown repeatedly you cannot support with facts. You cannot support the claim that the emails were deleted only after the others were turned in, you cannot support the claim that Clinton deleted them herself, you cannot support the claim that she alone decided which emails were and were not personal.

But I've yet to see a single link from you.

You have provided several links that contradict or fail to support your assumptions. Not yet have you provided a single link that supports them.

You really should try reading some time.

Yes, at this point I've produced 3 links, all of which say the same timeline/details.

No , you have not. Had you bothered to read the pages you have linked to, you would know that they do not support your claims. In fact you would have done almost as well to link to goatse.

Are you telling me you leave all your email in your inbox and never delete anything? Maybe you don't get much email, but for those who use email for work that would be a huge volume of email.

No, I do not routinely delete 30,000 emails on a "regular basis".

You really suffer mightily at reading comprehension, here. Try reading what I wrote before you reply to it.

Which is probably why you also missed my statement before that there are a LOT of problems with Hillary. It just so happens that you are obsessing over making up shit about a problem that you cannot demonstrate to be an actual problem. You have a lot of egg on your face now, and throwing silly accusations at me doesn't help clear it.

Comment Re:A no-brainer... (Score 1) 402

It's not more secure than Windows 7. How can it be more secure if it leaks your information, without your knowledge, to a third party, AND if the software update mechanism is so user hostile (unrequested reboots, machine slowing to a crawl at random times) that the only workaround is to disable updates completely, either at the firewall or via hacks?

I like a lot about Windows 10, but it's less secure, more resource intensive, and less responsive. I'm keeping Windows 7 machines around in my home for a reason.

Comment Re:32% would vote clinton (Score 1) 426

Remember, victory is not really the goal. The object is to keep the match running.

They really do need Trump, and it shows, to the point it makes me suspect they hired him for the gag.

This is why we have Trump and Clinton at the top. They are the next level, little else, of a game that became readily apparent to me with Humphrey, and it has been played that way since.

I believe the intention there is to keep congress as close to 50/50 as possible to make it easier to pass blame back and forth in a game that is called "rotating villain",

It's nothing but *good cop/bad cop*, and you are a sucker

I've been telling you that there is no opposition between the Rs and Ds for years.

At this point the Rs and Ds work together more as a tag team than as actual opponents.

The politicians are just in it for the money, coke, and hookers. They are playing an entirely different game that the public does not want to acknowledge. They don't want to hear that they are being taken for a ride.

It still smells like they hired him for this.

He's the hired clown for the birthday party. The man is a democrat.

Yeah, I've grossly mischaracterized your position.

Bonus paranoia:

The Sanders campaign has always been against Stein, not Clinton

Comment No rental of smartphone games (Score 1) 157

Doom, with its limited interactivity works fine.

Which Doom are you talking about? The first Doom isn't in Google Play Store. I searched, and all I got were Doom 3 ($9.95) and several apps whose titles included "Doom" but were unrelated to Idthesda's franchise.

Besides, how would I go about trying a paid game in order to understand how its input method works? Back in the old days of cartridge- and CD-based consoles, I could rent the cartridge from a local video store, and I could scan my local friends' collections on their shelves. Nowadays, with paid downloads, I'd have to ask each of my local friends whether he or she owns each game on this list, and I don't foresee much success in that especially in an era where one's gamer friends are more likely to live in a different city.

Comment Re:The intent of Copyright (Score 1) 211

Perpetual licenses seems a very bad idea in the first place. I see no reason why they shouldn't have to be renegotiated yearly, by law

If it becomes standard practice for a motion picture's producer to own its copyright, then studios could make it a standard practice to require producers to defer royalties for a year and further require producers to forfeit royalties earned during the previous year if the producer declines to renew the license. Otherwise, if a producer can take the royalties and run, studios would be unwilling to give producers hundreds of millions of dollars to make motion pictures.

Comment Re:32% would vote clinton (Score 1) 426

Why? Because they're actually up for grabs.

I would be fascinated to see the research that leads you to this conclusion.

Asians aren't a sure thing for Republicans or Democrats.

This is doubtful.

Latinos aren't a sure thing for Republicans or Democrats (though they lean Democratic)

The numbers say otherwise, and that's before Trump opened his big mouth.

Comment Re:32% would vote clinton (Score 1) 426

I deny them nothing

You deny them everything. In your universe, Trump was "placed" into the race in order to make Hillary "look good". I keep calling out your lack of evidence for any of these assertions, and all you can do in rebuttal is waffle incoherently.

They get the respect they deserve

Fuck me you're clueless. This isn't about you saying mean things about people, it's about you valuing hokey conspiracy over human agency.

And they give Clinton her singular advantage of at least sounding like a grownup.

So? If you're going to shackle yourself and your party to nativism, scientific illiteracy and contempt for civil rights, what the fuck do you expect? Again, you need a less dumb conspiracy theory.

And when you stop playing the fool

Always stated, never demonstrated. God, you suck.

I will take you a bit more seriously also

Go fuck yourself, you narcissistic buffoon.

I'm not going to write War and Peace just you can have your high word count that only wastes my valuable time.

Of course not. You couldn't write a pamphlet on writing pamphlets.

The way you're acting, it's just not worth the effort.

Says the asshole Who. Keeps. Coming. Back. For. More. Over. And. Over. Again.

And besides all that, you should learn that short sweet sentences are all that is needed.

LOL, such a noob. Different tools for different jobs. But I guess when all you have is a micropenis...

A six second story does not need a 30 minute setup and the high drama to lure in an audience. Save that for the movies and soap operas. In and out, nobody gets hurt. Simplicity is god. Save the pity for yourself there, buddy.

But it apparently needs lot of short filler sentences that have nothing to do with what we're discussing and even contradict their supposed intent. Gotcha. You do know you spend more explaining yourself and your methods than you do actually discussing the subject? You really are a weak sister.

Slashdot Top Deals

Can't open /usr/fortunes. Lid stuck on cookie jar.