Comment Re: Flock pays for vandalism? (Score 1) 57
Law not lae.
Comment Re: Flock pays for vandalism? (Score 1) 57
It would make sense for Flock to have guarantees for weather damage or similar, but vandalism is a lae enforcement proposition. Flock definitely overextended themselves.
Comment Flock pays for vandalism? (Score 1) 57
What kind of crackhead at Flock agreed to a contract obligating them to cover the cost of cameras lost to vandals?
Comment Re:DDSS (Score 1) 57
If Flock is losing money, then presumably so will everyone else.
Comment Re:See, this is the real problem (Score 1) 92
People seem to only have memory that goes back two years.
We went to war with Iraq due to faulty intel. No AI was involved at all, at least not in the modern sense of the term. Just a human expert hallucinating a bioweapons lab from a blurry photo.
Russia almost nuked us due to a faulty machine sending a false positive about a nuclear attack. Definitely not AI.
Comment Re:Who cares? (Score 1) 4
There have been some democratic candidates who have been able to get some local traction without taking special interest money, but that's only possible if they had a large war chest of money ready before they announced their candidacy. An independent would face the same challenge.
Comment Re:Embrace and Extend. (Score 3, Insightful) 91
Just waiting for Rust#