I ain't seen him sieg heil yet

But that is not what Google is referring to. They are saying that schools cannot have the normal search without the AI hallucinations. Also, if AI is meaningfully involved with Google's traditional search results, then that only serves to explain why they are so shit now. But most importantly, this argument is the one that Google wants us to have, and it is bullshit.

The schools are not, in general, making a moral objection to AI. They are making a practical one, where they do not want the students exposed to a chatbot while a human is trying to teach them something sans hallucination. Having a discussion about whether the traditional search results have any AI in them is fundamentally disingenuous, which is why I am 0% surprised to see you engaging in it.

We had that joke today on Teams.

Other employee: Looks more like Office 364
Me: I think it's more like Office 363 now

Assorted smiley reaccs ensue.

Either thing would be better than this. This is fucking chaos.

Just making excuses for CEOs not being able to follow the law, you mean.

Fuck off with that shit, it's morally bankrupt.

The people you are talking about are rich as fuck, they can afford to meet people on international vacations. No matter what I will not cry for the fucking billionaires, nor lick their boots.

Read the third paragraph of the summary.

Illiteracy is sad, especially here

You're a fucking idiot, that's my rebuttal. You know how nothing works, that's my rebuttal.

Lol the people who rape employees have mod points

They haven't lost all trust, though. Most orgs will learn nothing and change nothing.

IME spool. But YMMV

I've already equipped agents with access to credit cards that I generate at privacy.com and give budget caps to. It's just experimental amounts ($5-$50) and usually for paying for APIs or services to support the task. But it's all about risk management–I don't use models that train on my data, keep account and access contexts separate, and rely on service accounts for risky work instead of using my identity. We have to remind people that it's still the early days and things are changing rapidly. It reminds me of the early 90s and the flurry of innovation and the chaos that comes with change; this is all happening a lot faster.

"Are we really supposed to question the reputation of a company with a $4 trillion market capitalization over that?"

That was certainly one way to let us know that you're a piece of shit.

Fuck you and the clanker you rode in on.

Oh no, the richest guy at the company might have to date outside the company! How will he every be able to afford to do that!

Fucking seriously?

It's a completely different algorithm to the one that produces the search results, so that's a limp dicked argument.

That's a lie. You're a liar.