Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:hmm (Score 1) 195

stop objectifying women as "Birthing People" - don't deny it, the 2022 budget called women birthing people.

It's not a political talking point. It is a reality that some people who give birth will look exactly like men (when clothed, obviously). Are you interested in accuracy when laws and policies are written?

The problem you have here, is I am speaking of science, of which a DNA test will validate exactly what a person is. There are females, there are males and a very small number of intersex results. You are speaking of how a person dresses. SRSLY?

Here's the problem. First is of course the obvious objectification. An objectification that many women find extremely offensive.

Second, there is a huge problem with claiming you demand accuracy.

A "birthing person" is a Genetic female who can give birth to another person. That means that prepubescent, post menopausal, and sterile genetic females are by definition not "birthing persons". Aside from the obvious discomfort that involuntary sterile females might have in not living up to the objectification, you need to make up more terms for genetic females tho do not fit into the "Birthing person" term, otherwise, your accuracy claim is hypocritical.

In addition stop denying science and biology. Supporting biological men playing sports on biological women's athletic teams is part of this, and not only is batshit insane, but places women under the tyranny of men.

This is a red herring that was invented by the anti-trans movement to try to find an anti-trans cause they could rally people behind. Rules for sports at national, regional, and international levels have addressed issues of gender and sex and fairness for decades and decades, with no serious loss of opportunity or safety issues.

Give me the citations and names of men who have played on womens' competitive sports teams, for decades and decades.

Second, make no mistake - I 100 percent support people who want to "transition" to the other side, as long as they are adults.

Make no mistake, I do not support physically altering the sexual organs of people who cannot give consent to sex. The problem is that many young people are either confused about their sexuality, and change their minds. And transition of minors who might be confused, is definitely a rubicon. Once a person has their penis or breasts amputated, or vagina altered to place a mock penis, there is really no going back.

Stop supporting medical experiments on children. Look up Chloe Cole on Youtube. A supposed Trans, she was altered with injections that harmed her, and had her breasts amputated at 15. This is cruel Mengele' level experimentation. She eventually figured out she just had some issues going through puberty, and just like her biology, was a woman, but could no longer be a complete woman. She did testimony before congress. And she's not the only one who regrets transitioning

Okay, so now go ask those who wanted to transition but were bullied, attacked, etc. Oh, wait, you can't, because many of them are dead.

Surely you have the numbers of teens who committed juice specifically because they were "in the wrong body". Not those who ended themselves because of regular bullying.

Secondly, it is interesting that you do not care at all about teens who changed their mind. You have a specific list of people who are worthy of inclusion in your "care list" I do care about bullied schoolchildren. I also have a care for children who were mistakenly harmed by medical experimentation. You have made it clear you do not.

Finally, you are an example of not only why the Democrats lost the White House, your bigoted reaction. shows why if you retain teh power, Democrats will spend the proverbial 40 years in the desert.

In the end, it is a "tyranny of the weak" It is still a tyranny.

Comment Re:hmm (Score 1) 195

Yep. You don't like the Dems plans. So may as well vote for no plans and blowing up the government. It's a self fulfilling prophecy and you end up with the government you deserve.

Ahh, assuming you are the same coward who replied to my first post, you'll perhaps remember that I clearly noted that I haven't voted for a Republican in over 25 years, and then it was only one - Arlen Spector. So your assumption is badly incorrect from the start.

Even more to the point, the years of the path Dems were on were effectively doing the same thing as your "blowing up the government".

In the end, they were every bit as bad as those they declared their enemies. And they were declaring more groups their enemy all the time.

A party cannot eliminate racism, sexism, and ageism when they are overtly racist, sexist, and ageist. Just because they apply their 'isms to different demographics does not change that.

No homie, there was no good choice in the last general election. Hopefully the Democrats will right their ship. I've been seeing signs of that recently.

Comment Re:I think (Score 1) 48

Talk about non-starterz ! The only research you want to do with "data-centers/LLM/*.ai" is ... how much C4 ....'XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX' deleted for the obvious national security reasons ....

My friend, you have an overactive imagination. How you pulled that out what I wrote is quite creative, but silly and wrong.

My point, and my only point, is that the present concept of huge power sources dedicated to AI data centers is premature. Effective AI is a couple generations early. At present, the paradigm sucks up too much power.

Comment I think (Score 1) 48

That the idea of data centers gobbling up incredible amount of Electricity is a real non-starter. Because at this early time, the end game of AI is likely to use a lot less power. So it's a given AI is here - do more research to make it something sustainable.

Even the idea of restarting old decommissioned nuclear plants like Three Mile Island is silly. The idea of using 1960's nuc technology, managed by profit driven people who will demand that profit over safety is thing one - that's a bit chilling.

Comment Re:Manus (Score 1) 24

When all these C-types are in the board room sitting around that mahogany table, do they actually speak this way between themselves

Yes.

The ones I have been in don't talk anything like that. And I've been in many.

The different scopes involve different speaking terms, those with a military bent have one set of recurring terms. Technology based boards, another. Marketing yet another, along with fiduciary involved boards. Some of the groups I have been in have significant overlap.

Once you have been in a field, you end up getting used to the terms used, and they are logical.

"Manus is the action engine that goes beyond answers to execute tasks, automate workflows, and extend your human reach." Now that is bullshit. And if someone said that in a board I'm on,, I'd tell them it was bullshit.

I too, for a long fucking time, held the belief that they must be just feeding us that shit. No- I'll grant them this: They eat their own shit.

What boards have you served on to gain that unassailable knowledge?

Comment Re:hmm (Score 1) 195

Sorry. Americans don't do rational.

Democrats have policies. They get questioned about those policies. Not everyone always likes the answers.

Republicans promise "everything will be better and you'll get a pony". Plus it's OK to be racist now. Nobody asks any questions.

Who do you think people will vote for?

While it is popular to claim that Americans are the stupidest people ever to be put on earth, there is a non-zero chance they are simply humans, who do risk/reward assessments.

Yes, the Republicans have no real plans.

The problem is that in roughly the past 15 years or so, the Democrats went off the rails. Republicans have done the same in years past. Think about the second time O'Blama was elected. So after Hillary Clinton won the election, yet lost the White House because of a quirk of the electoral college, and the far left ended up grabbing the party by the balls, they ended up in 2024, reaping what they were sowing.

If there is something that they might try: Understanding that there is no "estrogen wave". You will not win elections when you openly broadcast that men are the enemy. Become a party where normal masculine men are considered equals of women, not universally patriarchal rape culture fans.

Not bending the knee to far left academic sophists who have convinced the party that it is not possible to define what w woman is, and to stop objectifying women as "Birthing People" - don't deny it, the 2022 budget called women birthing people.

In addition stop denying science and biology. Supporting biological men playing sports on biological women's athletic teams is part of this, and not only is batshit insane, but places women under the tyranny of men.

Stop supporting medical experiments on children. Look up Chloe Cole on Youtube. A supposed Trans, she was altered with injections that harmed her, and had her breasts amputated at 15. This is cruel Mengele' level experimentation. She eventually figured out she just had some issues going through puberty, and just like her biology, was a woman, but could no longer be a complete woman. She did testimony before congress. And she's not the only one who regrets transitioning

Support the working class. The Democrats publicly abandoned the working class, Harris claiming she would win with or without their support. That one aged like milk

If you are going to make commercials to attract men to vote for you, have actual men make them. The Men for Kamala ads were utterly cringeworthy, as if they decided to have a group of gender studies majors make the commercials, using parodies of men. And definitely use the fat dude talking about "eating carburetors for breakfast", or other misandry based drivel.

Want the White House back? provide what people will vote for,

Comment Re:hmm (Score 1) 195

Vote 4 me so I can release the Epstein files. Doesnt release the Epstein files. It's OK we forgive you.

Vote 4 me, no new wars Starts new wars It's OK we forgive you.

Vote 4 me I'll drain the swamp Becomes most corrupt President ever It's OK we forgive you.

etc etc.

Republicans are in a cult. There is no other possibility

Their spokespeople come out and say the stupidest craziest lies. Republicans just passively nod.

It is amazing, is it not? TrumpCult is not a bad description.

The next general election, the biggest weapon the Democrats will have is the old saying "Are you better off today than you were 4 years ago?"

And Trumpfuel and Trumpfood will be a big item. All those far righties in their big 10 mpg trucks are paying for their fealty.

Comment Re:Meanwhile (Score 1) 195

Believe it or not, I STILL find it pays to compare Amazon to maybe smaller retailers....for shipping vs tax!!!

I find a lot of sellers out there that still do not charge sales tax and some times...that makes it cheaper than Amazon...

It depends on if they send you a tax notice or not. There was an outfit in Ohio that I used to purchase a lot of electronics from. One year I got a note from them listing my purchases, and that I would have to pay taxes on. That was a pain in the ass.

I think they got "caught", or had new accountants or something. But yes - if you can avoid the sales tax, it's a significant discount.

Comment Re:hmm (Score 1) 195

Why are you trying to justify the absolute nonsense this administration is trying to sell? None of it makes any sense if you put even a second of thought to it. You might try it some time.

I might as well piss everyone off now, so I'll wade into the piss filled pool.

First off, I haven't voted for a republican since Arlen Spector. (check that out) Republicans in general are the worst sort of cowards, spend money we don't have like drunken sailors, and are a general waste of sperm, oxygen and other resources.

That the USA is a fucking mess right now is an outcome that anyone with a functioning brain could forsee happening, even if the exact details weren't clear at the time. Inflation, 5+ dollars per gallon diesel, general deterioration, and on and on.

I'm going to have everyone hate me and wish death on me now. Because liberals are people people, and love others. 8^/

After the 2024 election, I did some political introspection. How did such a thing happen? How did a proven incompetent and vindictive asshat get elected, and not by an electoral college trick, but an official majority?

So many do not want to hear this, but the Democrats played a huge part in their defeat at the polls. Drifting too far to the left, adopting misandry as a core principle. Outright denial of biology, ending up being unable to even define what a woman is. While utterly objectifying what the rest of us call women as "birthing people" Supporting medical experiments on children. Overt and well documented rejection of the working class, while becoming subservient to a small groups of far left sophist academics. Their social policies alienating and demeaning young males in addition to all males already cast out. The critical part is that young males usually start out on the liberal end of things. Perhaps a little difficult to get people your policies identify as the rape culture mortal enemy to vote for you.

Not calling anyone who does not agree with every one of the dictates stupid. Progressives working really hard to come to not being progressive at all.

Long story short, Democrats morphed into to being not quite sane at the party level. Hopefully, they will do a little introspection, and stop being so radical.

the question is whether they care to return to sanity. Sanity is not becoming a republican. Sanity is becoming rational, and not falling for sophist tactics. The responses will tell whether people have a bit of introspection, or will double down and embrace the irrational pool the Dems fell into the last few years. Who will you be? You strike me as a rational intelligent person.

Comment Re:Meanwhile (Score 1) 195

Amazon has free shipping options.

Only if you meet the order minimum or have a paid Prime membership (and even then, there's still some limitations). Packages don't just ship themselves, you know.

I have Amazon Prime. Determining if it is a good deal is pretty simple math. The main limitations with shipping I have is there is a 25 dollar minimum for overnight delivery vs 2 day. So sometimes I have to add another item - that I would have been buying anyway. Or I don't if 2 days is fine.

There are also some items that have a longer delivery time. I find this when buying exotic wood for projects. In almost all cases, it is because the product is not in stock at Amazon's fulfillment warehouses, so it gets shipped direct. But still no extra for shipping.

Slashdot Top Deals

"The greatest warriors are the ones who fight for peace." -- Holly Near

Working...